this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
274 points (89.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33336 readers
1073 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm talking about those youtube videos.

Feels like lowkey copaganda to me.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago

Those videos have actually shown me how often police investigations are an absolute clown show actually

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

This isn't surprising at all, it seems like a type of selection bias. Most people prefer to see the conclusion of a story, so crime stories where the criminals are caught make better stories. You know what else makes for a better story? Having a cop that was involved give a firsthand account. Bad bumbling cops naturally don't make it onto these kinds of shows.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 21 hours ago

Yeah.

If they are actually doing documentary work, they have to suck up to the cops so that the cops will cooperate with them. If they're too critical, they'll stop getting help.

If they're just rehashing Wikipedia or doing reaction content then they're adding nothing anyway

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

My partner and I quit watching these after I pointed out that they usually cover small town murders, and almost every time the crime is eventually solved, it's because the local police suck it up and finally ask for help from the state or FBI who actually know what they're doing. Similarly, the videos of cold cases that aren't yet solved rarely mention any involvement of more competent higher levels of police in the investigation.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I was overhearing a crime video my grandma was watching and holy shit the narrator could not be verbally sucking cop dick harder

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

There has been a fair amount of analysis of the social role of 'true crime' as a genre. To boil it way, way down, it's about creating a representation of human evil to let people feel essentially righteous. It is peak centrism, uplifting the status quo by placing it as opposition to the unquestionedly heinous, and with it, current structures, like cops as law enforcement.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We sometimes watch stuff like this and I will point out when they are coming out with something bullshit.

Like a police officer saying how dangerous escooters are because someone was killed a few months ago by one. Cars kill multiple people a day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a lot more cars around than Escooters though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fatalities per passenger mile is also lower

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

For scooters or cars?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

People like to feel that there is justice and that bad guys get caught. Serial killers and the source of info (mostly police departments) makes for low hanging fruit. To get less biased info would take more work. It is possibly different outside the US.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So do the fictional detective shows that are constantly popular for decades now. Propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But I love my British and Scandinavian detective series. They're great!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

It's Scottish, but have you watched Dept. Q? Good shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me and partner watch a lot of drama series…crime/detective/cop stuff is so dominant it’s unreal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

notice how the cops aren't even happy or good in their own propaganda 🤣

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

im just not a fan of the true crime industry. it makes me feel ill

[–] [email protected] 101 points 2 days ago (5 children)

What do you expect, do you want a crime documentary to sympathize with the criminals?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Occasionally they take the "investigation bungled by police" angle, but that's the exception rather than the rule.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

Nope. But I do expect them to call out incompetence, misogyny, racism...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Jeffrey Dahmer was just a hangry dude !

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

JCS criminal psychology is 100% copaganda. It presents cop interrogation techniques as a kind of science, as if the Reid technique wasn’t all about deliberately misunderstanding body language and coercing innocent people to confess.

Skip Intro has a good series on Copaganda. Talks about TV shows/fiction, but a lot of the messaging is the same.

Cops exist to protect property, not you.

If you want a good non-copaganda documentary though, Errol Morris’s The Thin Blue Line is a worthwhile classic.

[–] nylo 10 points 1 day ago

huh interesting, I always took the vibe of JCS to be "these are the dirty tricks they pull, shut the fuck up and get a lawyer because you won't win in an interrogation room"

maybe that's me projecting into it though idk

[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I mean it depends which ones are you watching.

True crime series usually deal with crimes where the perpetrator is undeniably guilty, and typically of very heinous crimes. It shows cases where the police is correctly doing what should be their job.

If there are any videos that show "we assaulted a random person on the street" type of police work in a positive way, I haven't seen it yet.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It shows cases where the police is correctly doing what should be their job.

That's debatable. I've seen a lot of them where they're interviewing the cop and they say things like "they knew he was guilty in their gut". I personally don't think police should be using their gut to investigate crimes. The documentary people only question statements like that if it's one of the ones about a guy who ended up being innocent.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The cringiest thing is when the narrator overanalyze every movement and portary the body language of the criminal as "telltale signs of guilt", and if the suspect is innocent (some videos also include arrests of innocent people), the narrator immediately say the body posture are "telltale signs of being innocent". Lmao wtf. Y'all read the entire story before making the documentary, hindsight 20/20.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I'm very anti-police, but the gut instinct and feelings can't be quantified, it's a feeling you get after you talk to someone, or hear them speak that says "something feels off and we need to look further into this".

We've all felt it after certain situations. It's obviously not evidentiary for court, but is a starting point to an investigation. Especially in crazy cases where you may be talking to a person that chops people up in their garage.

Using that tactic on someone with a broken tailight is nonsense though lol.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree with you that gut feelings are absolutely important things to acknowledge in general. Unfortunately a lot of people do not let their gut feelings go when presented with further information that contradicts it.

A lot of shows about crime have one cop who had a gut feeling and then dismisses all of the evidence that contradicts it like an alibi or forensics that show it was someone else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

How often is gut-feeling actually just bias and/or bigotry under the surface though? I feel like we shouldn't use those gut feelings to make judgements, ever, without examining exactly why we're having that response. The suspect might just be socially awkward or neurodivergent and that gut-feeling is actually just unexamined prejudice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago

Copaganda is real

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They are high-key copaganda. It’s overt and blatant.

What portion of these documentaries talk about false convictions, for instance?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean these tend to focus on actual crimes and not like police coverups or misbehavior. I bet though police misbehavior documentaries would get good traffic though. I can tell you there are some good subjects of topic from chicago.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

focus on actual crimes and not like police coverups or misbehavior.

I would consider the latter to be actual crimes. But I understand your meaning.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago

John Oliver does a great segment on the TV show 'Law and Order' and this exact phenomenon. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DNy6F7ZwX8I

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you like true crime and also someone not afraid to call out when the cops fuck up, I recommend Bailey Sarian. Love her "Honey let me TELL YOU" vibe, but that'll be a turn off for some people so YMMV.

I don't recall cops coming up much in Barely Sociable but he's great too though he hasn't posted in a while, and his stuff is less true crime and more mysterious stuff in general.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

There’s a YT video by Fern that goes over a story about some german cops burning a drunken black man alive and covering it up. Non-copaganda crime documentaries exist, although they’re rare. I love crime media, but I always take it with a grain of salt since the genre is generally pretty biased.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Netflix had a few really good ones that showed how the cops lied or bungled things.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

They might just rely on police reports Because they don't have the resources to do actual investigation.

load more comments
view more: next ›