BynarsAreOk

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Nonsense shit for views, the last paragraph is completely a parody of 9/11, its impossible not to notice it by the person writing this. The "X doesn't cut into Y" format is very much "jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (6 children)

Yeah I looked over his tweets to be sure, nothing but anti-Trump from him, he even writes Free Palestine lol. Not trying to rehabilitate him but I think its just him doing the usual military personal "thoughts and prayers" stuff rather than actualy saying he would support the war imo. Iran shouldn't hit the US is a reasonable take from pragmatists, it would only get US public opinion on Trump's side etc...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

This, they look stupid now but seems like a reasonable take, if he ever considered this I bet the TACO stuff hit him too so an award months from now isn't as good as a W today.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (11 children)

Are you sure? he is @RealScottRitter I don`t see anything like that, he seems very hardline on the Trump is an idiot and this is pointless.

This doesn't read like someone who is about to put on the uniform again to die for Trump`s idiocy but who knows.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Congratulations on never getting any future enemies to the negotiating table. They’ve basically shown that negotiating with American diplomats ends in their country getting bombed.

Counterpoint, nobody should negotiate with the US on principle. The last 40 years since the fall of the USSR has been a complete repetition of this lesson that seemingly nobody wants to learn.

Don`t get me wrong, I agree with your point here, but I feel the starting premise is already false. Who exactly was ever arguing for being peaceful and friendly with the US in hopes of some pragmatic deal?

25 something years ago someone would have said Russia...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

The fact we're reduced to pinning our hopes on Iran and not the other 2 military superpowers that could significantly tip the scales of this conflict says it all.

We will likely be here 6 months from now having the great "realization" that the US's intent was to bomb and destroy Iranian civil society as a whole and not some underground bunker, and you'll hear this realization from the same experts that are pandering "Israel is running out of missiles" without a hint of irony.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

they used the situation to have a political and trade related motivation for stopping eare earth metal exports, knowing that us military assets are dependent on those resources.

This doesn't make much sense though. The rare earth mineral, despite what the grifters want to claim, will only realy make a material difference in this war months if not years from now.

The current US stocks already exist, obviously. The IDF bombs and missiles already exist, the US already made even more contracts to build even more bombs, JDAMs specificaly, that are being used in Iran and Gaza right now. This was April 2025 US approves major weapons shipment to Israel as IDF prepares for Gaza offensive, eyes Iran

My point is if China was using the rare earth ban as a principled tool of aiding the resistance in the ME they would have done this 18 months ago. Yet not only they didn't but they spent all this time welcoming Biden and even wholesale accepting the previous US admin demands.

Indeed if Kamala had won(or Trump not done the tariffs) we would be in the same Iran war right now but without the tariffs ban there would be no RE ban, just like in the 14 months of Biden there was no embargo against Israel, which btw don't forget we saw Syria collapse under Biden and the Israel embassy strike too. We knew Israel was escalating for about 12 months now too sadly.

And of course lets admit that the RE ban was a much stronger measure than necessary, so why not simply stop the civilian trade with Israel, nobody would've blamed them except the western neolibs who would cry "China is HAMAS!1!!1!" for picking a side. At that point, sadly as I repeat often China cares far too much about having their seat at the "civilized" table and not about ideals of international socialist struggle or anything like that.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The thing is and this might be yet again stating the obvious, how is this a China win?

If "Israel running out of [insert key resource/weapon"] is such a great 5d play then why didn't China already embargo Israel over the last 18 months of genocide, couldn't they see that continuing to support Israel would lead to them continuing their aggression? The 5d chess players couldn't even play the 1st move of checkers, perhaps if Israel were under such an embargo there wouldn't even be a war with Iran right now. In fact, hey Xi if you're still listening, the best time to stop trading and sustaining Israel's economy was 18 months ago, the second best time is today, just saying.

But the elephant in the room is that this wasn't a 5d move or a principled act, China only reacted after being pressured by Trump's tariffs. Yet they welcomed Biden's admin in 2024 with open arms even as the Biden team pressured them to change their economy.

The elephant in the room is if Trump wasn't an idiot pivoting from big plot to big plot to get his desperate huge W, if he had simply started the Iran war before pressuring China with the tariffs there would certainly be no rare earth ban right now.

That the CPC was pressured against the wall and forced to use the rare earth ban for leverage now allegedly causes inconvenience to Israel is just a happy coincidence. We need quite a bit more of those for meaningful change and it is pitiful to portray this as some 5d chess.

You are literaly one of the most responsible(and South Africa's coal etc) for Israel to remain stable enough to function as a society right now, zero self-awareness from the grifters right now, can't even read the damn room.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That is the thing, I agree with you, but the US is self sufficient and the EU already gets LNG from the US now so whose outputs are getting reduced by 30%? Maybe the EU is at some risk but not the US and if we say the global south again, I don't think anyone actualy cares about it, we`re in the endgame where as far as everyone is concerned the "world economy" is just an euphemism for US and China.

Again back to the point this could just lead to another commodities boom that benefited the OG BRICS back in 2005-2010. Today's BRICS aren't concerned about oil hurting industry since we have none. Except from China all of BRICS are primarily commodity exporters not industrialized nations.

The biggest losers in all of this would be the global south seeing food prices skyrocket like in 2022.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I do not think institutional investors will let oil e.g Brent go over 100-120 in the worst case. Assume they could be wrong by 2x, hitting 200+ seems like a WW3 scenario and Gulf oil is very short of that yet.

There is absolutely way too money to be made by manipulating the price up and down.

They have spent the last 2 years pushing the China "weak demand" narrative in order to push oil price down. There are billions and who knows how many huge players deeply invested into shorting oil for the long term. Some of them are getting out now but not everyone, in fact nothing ever happens gang exist in the financial market too and the "China weak demand" narrative will stay dominant.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

I think we should consider that the ME oil = world economy narrative may be overestimated.

The US is self sufficient already and they're also supplying the EU. The "world economy" is already in shambles, the EU is in a recession since 2022, yes markets will crash, commodity prices skyrocket, but we should consider that in actual practice the impact on the west may not be as big as people are assuming here.

The calculation may well be the pain is worth it because the US isn't going to be the one suffering the most. If this is what they believe then all this calculation based on "the US can't do X because it would destroy the Gulf oil production" is moot.

Also it goes without saying it is China the one to lose out the most if we have another commodities boom. It is China the one primarily looking for cheap oil and cheap food, not the US.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I think you're closer to the truth here, still saying the hits were on warehouses etc still begs the questions about workers and security on site etc these are military facilities after all.

Obviously the counterpoint is given they would know such a strike is coming eventually its hard to imagine precautions around this aren't already in place.

 

sequel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P_tceoHUH4

Do you want to hear a joke? She doubled and tripled down after this video lol.

No its not just that she shilled for capitalism but her anti-science denialism and doomerism based on nothing but her own anecdotal experience. Truly one of the best examples of YTer gets big -> algo panders content to certain audience -> YTer starts pandering to new audience.

I don't remember her being this bad years ago but its a moot point now.

 

I just got this randomly by the algo lol. I know nothing of him or his channel.

Despite the bad introduction he gets there about 10-15 minutes in. Of course there is no reason to watch a random guy talk for 40 minutes but I do think it is kind of bittersweet, personally I liked that he cares about the dog.

The ultimate reason? American healthcare is demoralizing even for people who are the top of the elite experts in their field. Some of them end up deeply unhappy, traumatized even. The contradictions are obvious, so extremely obvious its not just impossible not to notice but not feel bad about it.

Moral of the story? Most people are not privileged enough to just quit but if you find yourself in this situation and you can do it, actually consider it. This capitalist world isn't worth your personal sacrifice, no matter how good your intentions.

 

A long endorsement of open source software before announcing he will be making Godot tutorials now.

Might be a good incentive to switch or try out game dev if you're new btw.

 

I prefers the term of Dialectical Materialism simulator.

It’s a fantasy game for closet commies, as HOI IV is for closet Nazis or Wehraboos in the end

I'm not bothering to read much of this(500 comments?), but after a few minutes quick glance its the usual fairly above average positive response as usual.

I wonder if it is because with the game becoming less popular again most of the mainstream is gone already.

 

WW2 poster Wiki

 

22 December 2023 Amazon may no longer sell its own wifi routers in Germany, as they infringe a Wifi 6 patent from Huawei. This was decided by Munich Regional Court last week following the oral hearing. The ruling does not affect the sale of third-party wifi routers via the Amazon platform.

Two European subsidiaries of Amazon and Eero – a manufacturer of wifi routers also owned by Amazon – have infringed European patent EP 3334112 and may now no longer sell Wifi-6-capable products in Germany. The Regional Court Munich handed down this ruling on December 15, on the same day as the hearing.

Huawei had sued for injunctive relief, information and accounting, destruction, recall and damages (case ID: 7 O 10988/22).

However, the ruling only affects wifi routers that Amazon and Eero manufacture themselves, such as the Amazon Fire TV Stick 4k. Other manufacturers may continue to sell their products via the Amazon platform.

Potential damages Huawei can enforce the judgment against a security deposit totaling €4.5 million. Amazon may appeal against the judgment, and this is considered likely. However, the court has not justified its surprisingly quick decision in writing yet. According to JUVE Patent information Amazon has not yet filed an appeal.

If the ruling stands, Amazon would have to compensate Huawei for the damages it has suffered since 19 March 2020. According to JUVE Patent information, Amazon has not thus far filed a nullity action against EP 112, but has concentrated on the FRAND defence.

Four claims against Amazon The judgment is part of a larger dispute over Wifi 6 patents. Huawei has also sued Amazon over another Wifi 6 patent in Munich (case ID: 7 O 10987/22). The court will hear this case in March 2024. In Düsseldorf and Munich, Huawei sued Amazon over a Wifi 5 patent, but the courts have not yet set a date for the oral hearing.

Huawei is also taking action against Fritzbox manufacturer AVM with two infringement suits at the Regional Court Munich. In November, according to press reports the court ordered AVM to cease and desist. The court was of the opinion that Wifi-6-capable AVM products infringed Huawei’s EP 3 337 077. AVM has since appealed against the ruling.

In addition, Huawei sued other companies such as Netgear and automotive group Stellantis. The Chinese company sued the former at Düsseldorf Regional Court. Huawei sued Stellantis back in 2022 over mobile phone patents that play a role in car connectivity. The Netherlands-based company manufactures about six million cars a year under the Fiat, Opel, Peugeot and Citroën brands.

Huawei turns to UPC While Huawei only sued Amazon and AVM in German patent courts, the Chinese company escalated its dispute with Netgear to the Unified Patent Court in July. Previously, Huawei had not had much success at Düsseldorf Regional Court. The court had dismissed one of Huawei’s lawsuits and suspended the second.

Huawei’s lawsuit at the Munich local division was one of the first SEP proceedings at the new court (case ID: ACT_459771/2023). According to the website www.upc.beetz.nl Netgear recently has filed a counter claim of revocation with the UPC.

Where are the "but but ze seeseepee only steals our technology!111!!" responses now lol.

 

This is You're Not Old Enough for an i9 the video.

Actual good comment I like

For a document like this to go out, it has to go through multiple stages of approval… that’s nuts to think about

Yep, forget for a moment all the Marxist analysis you'd normaly do about capitalism and just think of examples like this, this is one of the best examples of collective narcissistic disorder or something, either someone at the top was realy invested to get this presentation done like this or "marketing" is realy just code word for the psychopath department.

 

"This isn't one of your fucking gremlins its an Enterprise"

 

Historical/WW2 stuff for the first half, foreign tanks and vehicles starting from @22:00

 

r/politics

“It seems like every cycle we say that and we kind of mean it but this time I think we are in a category change where I believe the United States and the way that we think about ourselves as a nation has not been in danger like this since 1865. I think the only comparable moment to this was the Civil War,” he tells The New Abnormal co-host Danielle Moodie.

 

No real consequences though, still fucking rich and will still get another job elsewhere but maybe they can get someone less ghoulish this time. Yeah no.

 

Shamelessly stolen from r/sls

Is it really so hard to find a clean picture?

view more: next ›