this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
1008 points (97.4% liked)

me_irl

6450 readers
722 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is why I've stopped listening to 99% Invisible.

"Oh, cool that's what the bumps in the sidewalk/curb are for - blind accessibility stuff. Wait, why did it take that fucking long to actually make those a reality and why isn't it everywhere?"

Even their more lighthearted ones tend to dive into some orphan grinding machine territory.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Some countries (like mine) still don't have anything like that. Commuting sucks even for able-bodied people due to mismanagement/corruption.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is me but with anti-car urbanism. Ever since I discovered Not Just Bikes, my feed has more and more videos showing how much better life can be if we shut off car brain and build for medium density with mixed use zoning and multi-mode infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's healthier for damn sure. But it only works if you can stand being around people. If you need space from people...you know, so they don't annoy you to the point of violence...then you need to live somewhere more remote, which necessitates driving. I'd love to walk a block, catch a bus, then walk a block to my destination if I didn't mean dealing with uncensored raw-humanity shoving its crotch into my face as I awkwardly pretend to be hyper-focused on my phone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, no shade on rural living for those who need the space. I'm more opposed the the forced ruralization of suburbia. This video popped up in my feed and shows how much better medium-density suburban living could be in many places.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The bottom line rebuttal to all the variants of the "but whatabout people who want to live in single-family houses" arguments is real simple: if it were truly that important to them, then they would be willing to pay fair-market rates for it. Which means artificially inflating the supply (thus subsidizing the price) via restrictive zoning laws wouldn't be necessary.

People who think they are entitled to live in single-family houses to the point that they want the law to forcibly impose that lifestyle on vast swathes of the population are just selfish takers who want society to subsidize them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Suburbs are also not giving that much space. Houses aren't that far apart.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is why I watch kurzgesagt so I can have EXISTENTIAL crisis about things that will never actually affect me like the sun burning out, or the universe going completely dark, instead of more worldly crisis.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Kurzgesagt has a tendency to put neoliberal spin on the solutions they offer and they've recieved heat for it in the past. Careful with that channel

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, I'll definitely keep that in mind while I'm building my Dyson sphere to harness 100% of the energy of the sun and fly earth across space.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

pfft, tryna shill inferior vacuum cleaner products on me. I'm a Henry man

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

You mean to tell me a channel sponsored by Bill Gates is techno-optimist? I am shocked!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup! This is why we need to take money out of the hands of the wealthy and give it to the people they exploited.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Seize the.... Something... Damn it, I know this!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

We have always feared a robot uprising that would take over the world and subjugate humans, as though robots will replace us as the ultimate alpha predators.

We've already been replaced by our own creation. Money itself is the dominant species on this planet. Capitalism is the metabolic process of the organism. The stock market is its circulatory system. Politicians are its organs. Billionaires are its reproductive system. The individual workers are the mitochondria. This is a planet scale life form that is ready to reproduce itself onto surrounding bodies in space.

If you want the solution to the Fermi paradox there it is. Once a civilization is infected with economics it's only a matter of time before it is consumed by its own creation.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears 1 points 6 days ago

I agree fully, but would say billionaires are fat cells

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Money is power in a form transferable over time and space.

Long before capitalism, people considered money to be the root of all evil. Many religions have restrictions on what can be done with money, especially asking for interest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It's a desire fetish. Like a religious icon evokes a deity, money evokes desire.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

No it's called money.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Me when I watch any nature/animal documentary. So many endangered or extinct animals and for what??

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

and for what??

agriculture

i can't find it rn but sth like this also applies to the land usage worldwide. basically, we're taking wild animal's land, and that's what's killing them.

human population count has gone up 30x since the medieval ages. We used to be 300 million, now we're close to 10 billion.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fun side-effect: one finds a strange appreciation and understanding for supervillains hell-bent on ending life on earth, "for no reason".

Hey, if you want to see the world burn so badly, stop dilly-dallying and bring out the big guns! This is really taking longer than necessary.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've flipped and flopped between being an accelerationist and a saviour when it comes to life-ending climate change.

Ultimately nobody has the guts to commit to using humans to simulate 100, 000, 000 whalefalls though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

How did you find a photo of me, with an accurate caption?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Also applicable to scrolling through Lemmy most days.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, so you too have watched Adam Curtis documentaries.

HyperNormalisation https://youtu.be/to72IJzQT5k

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I tried switching to historical documentaries but people have been terrible since well before we started writing things down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah I don't know when they would prefer to live instead. Every age and culture have their disadvantages, you can argue that some are more progressive than others in various ways.

But here's a fact. Penicillin was discovered 1928. That's not even 100 years ago. I don't know about others. But I'm really happy I live in the world where I don't have to risk dying from a tic bite.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I deal with it by trying my best but also a heavy dose of cognitive dissonance when required. And learning (painstakingly slowly) how to be compassionate to myself regarding my shortcomings of not being able to fix it all.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I just downloaded like 30 seasons of modern marvels. I'm hoping those will restore some of my optimism for life since watching that show made me happy as a child.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Hence why conservatives hate education. It makes you have to feel empathy for other people and we can’t have that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wait til you figure out that all of human history is one giant cycle of people being incredibly cruel to other people for incredibly tenuous reasons and realize this cycle will, presumably, never end; and thus every interaction you have with other people is if not driven by transaction (what can you do for them), likely to be driven by cruelty.

sweet dreams, it doesn't get better.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Except the vast majority of human interactions are either neutral or positive. If you approach life with the outlook that everyone is transactional, it's going to shape your behavior into an unlikable grump.

How does this cynical doomer shit get so much consistent up votes and echoes?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Because Lemmy is a hoard for emotionally and psychologically unwell people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

if anyone is in need of good news this morning: https://archive.is/lv3eU

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Meanwhile, History Channel: Aliens. It's all Aliens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Me when I first watched Mr.Rob0t as a kid

load more comments
view more: next ›