rambling_lunatic

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago

I don't want to kill Republicans. I don't have the skills and I'm also not American. Furthermore, you are right that the climate is suboptimal for assassinations of Republican politicians at this point. My point was one of morals: it is ethically justified to kill a fascist politician.

As someone who was born in Russia, I think I would still be living there if that miserable piece of shit rat that runs the country fucking died in the most painful way possible.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Hot take but being a high-ranking member of a fascist political party should absolutely make you a target of violence. The only concerns are tactical.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I looked through a different article and it said this: "Trump will be the first president since Herbert Hoover in 1932 not to speak at the conference at all, skipping it entirely in 2016 as the presidential nominee and again in 2017 and 2018."

So your man was invited but didn't come.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/naacp-breaks-with-116-years-of-history-to-snub-trump/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Did they invite him during his first term?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Also the anniversary of an important attempt to liberate the Dominican Republic from Trujillo, a fascist dictator who was propped up by the USA.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

A very big portion of How to Blow Up a Pipeline by Andreas Malm criticizes this study and how it ignores the more violent and property-destroying aspects of the movements it studied.

As Malm describes, the radical flank effect is a well-documented phenomenon in which the presence of a more militant faction in a social movement makes the authorities much more likely to compromise with the moderate elements.

I suggest you read the book if you haven't already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Belarus still runs their own KGB.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The crosses are iron at least

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't everyone get excited though? Even as a kid I would get excited because it would make chores easier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's horrible! You guys need to cut the personality cults out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I had to pass through US customs on my way home (layover in JFK). Bastards have portraits of Trump and Noem on the fucking wall.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bones are organs

 

Trianon must fall!

61
Deleuzian Rule (sh.itjust.works)
 
47
Rule (sh.itjust.works)
 

Please excuse the censorship, I don't think the gamer word is allowed on this instance.

19
Rule of Left Psychology (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

A lot of people on the left seem to hold The Authoritarian Personality by Adorno et al. and The Mass Psychology of Fascism by Reich in very high regard.

These are very old books. The Adorno book has been criticised for methodological reasons. The Reich book is very rooted in Freudian psychoanalysis. Yet they still seem to be widely read and discussed.

I am not a psychologist. Can psychologists please tell me if these works are still considered to be useful and supported by the available evidence? I feel awfully skeptical when someone backs their point up by citing them and I want to know whether I should unclench my arse.

Thank you :)

 
 

I earn a little spare cash as an English tutor over the Internet. My student is a little girl in Russia. During today's lesson she asked me if YouTube isn't working my country either. She said that people are trying to make RuTube to replace it.

I can't explain to her why it doesn't work for her but works for me. Either I must lie or break the law.

Kids are naive and innocent. It breaks the heart.

view more: next ›