this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
1155 points (99.8% liked)

News

30260 readers
3986 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In response to immigration raids by masked federal officers in Los Angeles and across the nation, two California lawmakers on Monday proposed a new state law to ban members of law enforcement from concealing their faces while on the job.

The bill would make it a misdemeanor for local, state and federal law enforcement officers to cover their faces with some exceptions, and also encourage them to wear a form of identification on their uniform.

“We’re really at risk of having, effectively, secret police in this country,” said state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), co-author of the bill.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

It has a carve-out for medical masks, so get ready for ICE to abuse the shit out of that if it passes.

[–] Initiateofthevoid 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This needs to happen, but

“We’re really at risk of having, effectively, secret police in this country,”

We're way past this. Without due process, without judical oversight, without identification... we're deep into actual secret police disappearing human beings off the street.

We absolutely need to ban them from hiding their identities while "serving" the public, but at this point we need to outright ban them from the state. Senators and comptrollers being arrested, lawmakers being killed, chaos in the streets...

Any state with any hope left of resisting the wave of fascism needs to outlaw ICE from having any jurisdiction within their borders. ICE detaining a human should be litigated and prosecuted as a kidnapping, because that's exactly what it is. "It'll start a war," you might say. No it fucking won't. It will either prevent a war, or the war has already started.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Banning it/them simultaneously goes too far and not far enough. Instead, explicitly legalize self-defense against anyone that fails or refuses to identify and validate their identity while performing official activities. Turn hiding your face and badge number into literal suicide.

[–] Initiateofthevoid 3 points 9 hours ago

This just starts the war directly between civilians and ICE, and it still doesn't address the underlying problem, which is that - masked or not - ICE agents are taking people off the streets and shipping them overseas to die, all without any oversight. The due process is still skipped over entirely. They might take the masks off, but the concentration camps will keep growing.

At the very least, they need to ban ICE agents from detaining anyone without a judicial warrant. These "administrative" warrants and blatantly racist stop-and-frisk ambushes need to stop.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand how it's even legal right now.

Why would they need exceptions?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Only really practical exception I can think of is when responding to fires or hazardous chemical releases (not caused by them just chucking teargas all over the place) or when working in hospitals or other indoor locations where there is an extremely high likelihood of encountering someone who is immunocompromised since they probably aren't up to date on their shots.

In these situations, other forms of identification should be incredibly prominently visible.

Edit for the latter since I know I'm gonna get "whatabouts": officer should be performing roles that necessitate their presence and are providing safety against clear and present threats, e.g., protection details, wellness checks, or collecting evidence. Not deporting children with leukemia or some such vile fuckery.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If I see some goon kidnap someone ima involve myself.

Citizens arrest I’ll shout

Stop resisting I’ll shout.

What’s good for the goose

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Might wanna bring a militia if you actually want to stop them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno why he had to go with a Star wars reference. Nazi brownshirts were literally called stormtroopers. Seems a more apt comparison.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because people dont read history text books... They know star wars, they dont know details about what happened in Germany in the late 1930s, if they did, we would not be in this situation...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Also stormtroopers were ripping their name from WW1 shocktroopers, they ran through the storm of bullet and thunder of artillery. Though it should be noted that some Nazi stormtroopers were actual WW1 stormtroopers, it should be noted that as a venn diagram it wasn't a single circle.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Badges should come with a QR code, linked to a government database, profiling official officers. Warrants should also get a QR code, with a justice's signature, reasoning, and a short list of what activities are permitted by the warrant. The judicial branch controls their own database for the warrants and justices, while the state or federal governments have their own databases for their respective officers.

Also, should these conceptual reforms happen, people should be able to immediately send a copy of the presented warrant and badges to their lawyers and agencies via a QR snapshot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Judges should be assigned RSA keys in a hardware module, and their public key available to everyone.

Then we build a FOSS app downloading all the Public Keys of every judge, then they would sign warrants with their RSA key.

A simple scan should also check the digital signature, and confirm its validity.

Also there should be 3 hardware modules on the same keychain, each marked with a random number that the judge remembers. If they get kidnapped, they can use either of the 2 duress keys that would signal the warrants are illegitimate and automatically revoke the real key.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm required to wear a photo id visible at all times while I'm at work as a cable lineman. Wear all the silly hats you want, long as your badge/Id visible and presented when asked.

Wild these papers please people can't figure it out for themselves.

[–] Zealousideal_Fox_900 9 points 12 hours ago

Where I live cops wear strips on their vest with their station, and name badges with their officer number and name.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

In theory, anyone could forge a badge, claim to be ice, and literally kidnap people into sex trafficking or slavery and we wouldnt find out for quite a long time. That's in addition to the already dangerous prospect of having unidentifiable police who are unaccountable.

There should be passed ASAP. Should become a national law too but not gonna happen with this government. We need to pass this on a local and state level as much as possible.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago

Also many people may not necessarily know how a real ICE badge looks like. And fake badges are available for collectors and cosplayers alike. Also most people will not fully check or examine a badge or insignia, meaning by the time they realize it is fake it will be too late.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Isn’t this already happening?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago

mmmm People whom are know to hang out on an island full of under age sex trafficed girls, are now in power of the government. Oh of course it is happening, But its no longer limited to the island, and its government approved.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Why not just... uhhh. Ban ICE.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

There's no political will. Most democrats aren't leftists and they still want some form of immigration enforcement, just with more checks and balances and the rule of law.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I always see these news of proposals. Wake me up when these proposals are have actually been legislated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

It's insane that it wasn't required from the start.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

You should not be under any obligation to assume or respect any proposed authority by a person unwilling to show you their face.

This sentence should not need to be spoken.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Imagine if the leader can use a fake name, change their voice, and wear a mask?

Wait isn't that just Darth Vader?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Conversely, I should not be required to show my face to anyone if I'm not trying to assert authority over them. Being a public servant means having a public identity, being a private citizen means you have the freedom to make choices about what you share.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago

You should not be under any obligation to assume or respect any proposed authority by a person unwilling to show you their face.

Explaining this to the guy with a badge and a mask shoving a gun in my face.

He's screaming and cocking the weapon, while a few of his friends approach me with tasers and clubs, but I'm just going to stand here waving a copy of John Locke's Social Contract while explaining that I am a Free Man On The Land and do not make joinder.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Encourage them to wear identification? ENCOURAGE them?!? How that is not and has not always been mandatory is beyond me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

It's a state legislature attempting to regulate a federal agency. Even if it manages to make it to the Governor's desk, you know Newsom will veto it, because he's a cowardly little toad man who has never found a boat he was above licking. And if, by some miracle it survives the legislature and Newsom discovers his spine, the federal courts will bat this away overnight.

All that is assuming Silicon Valley doesn't have enough votes in the state house to smoother this proposal in committee.

Why even worry about the language of a DOA bill? You're not stopping ICE from Sacramento. Not with the current crop of liberal dorks and techbro shills running things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

I mean, the president did threaten him, so maybe he'll grow a spine for his own safety.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Id would be trivial to fake. So either way it wouldn't solve much without a hefty penalty for using a fake one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Its already a hefty fine/jail time for impersonating a member of the law

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

I meant like ICE agents bringing fake ID so it had someone elses name on it and stuff. That wouldn't be impersonating law enforcement since they technically are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 138 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Oh? You want to "detain" my student/employee/friend/partner? You have to prove you're a law enforcement official and are legally-allowed to."

If that sounds unreasonable to anyone... you're the extremist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 176 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This has to pass. And other states need to follow suit. It's ridiculous any law enforcement can hide who they are unless they're undercover.

The thin blue line is how much responsibility they're willing to accept. And it's a very very thin line right now.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Doesn't matter if it passes. The president doesn't abide by the law, so they don't need to either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

And suddenly, all ICE agents are deemed undercover agents, plus with medical need to wear masks

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago

Plus, who is going to enforce it, cops? Lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This should also include identification on vehicles.

None of this unmarked pickup truck or white van bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This includes the "ghost letter" bullshit. They claim it's so they can blend in and catch violations as they happen. Bro everyone can see a cop driving from a mile away by the way they drive, the reinforced grill, the slightly beefier trim to hide the installed lights, etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Good. Let the cowards face their victims

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wearing masks isn't the issue, it's the lack of warrants and identification.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. There's a non-zero chance that maga civilians are dressing tactical and kidnapping people they believe shouldn't be here. I hope not, but there's really no way to know either way at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›