JacksonLamb

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

Every new stupid implementation of AI feels like a prank.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

For all the appearance of "competition" Thiel is balls deep in OpenAI since inception.

I had assumed he was using it to gather info on Palantir targets but it is obviously multi tasking now.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

According to my last update, the 30,000 children I targeted as equivalent to 1,500 troops have already been liquidated. In future, here are the steps I will take to improve my target selection.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

This. The sayings we all know can easily be repurposed. I am sorry I don't speak [english]. No I do not understand you. Thank you. Where is the train.

I may have done this to American tourists in Europe.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

"No hablo ingles"

"Quieres visitar El Salvador?"

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I think it is going to get a lot worse, but I certainly take your point.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What is that in the lower left corner?

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Geese do more than scream though.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

bizarre, dismal

What's bizarre and dismal is that someone is so starved for dopamine and attention from corporations that this is how they perceive what life looks like when you are not being targetted.

This is my normal view and it is far better.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

These are interesting times. Americans by and large have always insisted that they can overthrow a tyrannical government because their troops would "refuse" to uphold tyranny against their own people.

As we get closer to that situation becoming more than a hypothetical, more realistic arguments are beginning to receive prominance.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Definitely didn't originate with Alan Moore. I've seen it attributed to Pablo Picasso but I think the first is probably Aristotle.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No, a pastiche would be in the same style. This one is more like Goya by way of Norman Rockwell.

 

A U.S. jury in Miami has ruled that Chiquita Brands International is liable for financing the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), a paramilitary death squad designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. during Colombia's civil war.

This decision comes after 17 years of legal proceedings and a previous conviction in 2007 when Chiquita was fined $25 million for illegal payments to the AUC. The recent verdict marks the first time an American jury has held a major U.S. corporation accountable for complicity in human rights abuses in another country, newsletter Pirate Wire Services explained.

Plaintiffs represented by Earth Rights International, an NGO advocating for corporate responsibility, have long sought justice through courts in both Colombia and the United States regarding this issue. The jury in Miami recommended a civil fine of $2 million for each family member filing suit, following two "bellwether cases" selected from over a hundred filed by victims.

Court documents reveal that Chiquita paid 3 cents per dollar for each box of bananas exported from Colombia to the AUC, an organization responsible for thousands of civilian deaths, including the eradication of entire villages, the murders of trade union representatives and rivals, and the kidnapping of politicians. Victims and their families had lobbied for years to sue Chiquita in civil courts, efforts that the company delayed through various legal tactics.

In addition to the payments, victims and ex-AUC commanders claim that Chiquita provided weapons and gasoline to the paramilitary forces in the Urabá region of Colombia. They argue that Chiquita executives knew these resources were being used to kill civilians and suppress unions near their operations. Chiquita has denied these accusations, maintaining that the payments were extortion made under duress, an argument previously rejected by U.S. courts.

Chiquita attempted to move all civil cases to Colombian courts, but its motion was denied, and the cases proceeded in the U.S. In 2018, Colombia's Prosecutor's Office formally accused Chiquita executives of aggravated conspiracy to commit a crime and attempting to hide these payments as "security payments." The investigation was suspended in 2019 but may resume under Colombia's new lead prosecutor, Luz Adriana Camargo Garzón, who has expressed interest in the case.

The Colombian Peace Court has characterized Chiquita's actions, including labor union repression, as "crimes against humanity."

 

A U.S. jury in Miami has ruled that Chiquita Brands International is liable for financing the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), a paramilitary death squad designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. during Colombia's civil war.

This decision comes after 17 years of legal proceedings and a previous conviction in 2007 when Chiquita was fined $25 million for illegal payments to the AUC. The recent verdict marks the first time an American jury has held a major U.S. corporation accountable for complicity in human rights abuses in another country, newsletter Pirate Wire Services explained.

Plaintiffs represented by Earth Rights International, an NGO advocating for corporate responsibility, have long sought justice through courts in both Colombia and the United States regarding this issue. The jury in Miami recommended a civil fine of $2 million for each family member filing suit, following two "bellwether cases" selected from over a hundred filed by victims.

Court documents reveal that Chiquita paid 3 cents per dollar for each box of bananas exported from Colombia to the AUC, an organization responsible for thousands of civilian deaths, including the eradication of entire villages, the murders of trade union representatives and rivals, and the kidnapping of politicians. Victims and their families had lobbied for years to sue Chiquita in civil courts, efforts that the company delayed through various legal tactics.

In addition to the payments, victims and ex-AUC commanders claim that Chiquita provided weapons and gasoline to the paramilitary forces in the Urabá region of Colombia. They argue that Chiquita executives knew these resources were being used to kill civilians and suppress unions near their operations. Chiquita has denied these accusations, maintaining that the payments were extortion made under duress, an argument previously rejected by U.S. courts.

Chiquita attempted to move all civil cases to Colombian courts, but its motion was denied, and the cases proceeded in the U.S. In 2018, Colombia's Prosecutor's Office formally accused Chiquita executives of aggravated conspiracy to commit a crime and attempting to hide these payments as "security payments." The investigation was suspended in 2019 but may resume under Colombia's new lead prosecutor, Luz Adriana Camargo Garzón, who has expressed interest in the case.

The Colombian Peace Court has characterized Chiquita's actions, including labor union repression, as "crimes against humanity." The central issue in the U.S. civil court case was whether Chiquita's payments to the AUC materially assisted the group in its illegal actions.

view more: next ›