Yep, border patrol and the whole US government knows this is exactly what happens when you lock down all the safe routes - desperate people don't stop trying to enter just a bunch more of them die.
Still every president since Clinton has worked to lock down more and more routes (arc). Depraved scum would rather let people die out of sight and out of mind in the desert than have to deal with them in a civilized way.
The owner of some hotel chain complained to Trump so he chickened out, then Stephen Miller got back from a long weekend and threw a fascist temper tantrum so Trump chickened out again
Honestly, tho, this all seems less like chickening out to me and more like Diane Feinstein in 2023. He's mentally gone so his aides are trying to prop him up and ride it out, except those aides are all terrible petty jackasses who hate each other, so Trump is constantly "changing his mind"
*just sort of hardline effort
"If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention." - Heather Heyer
I mean fair, but I guess we gotta deal with hostile governments in order of proximity here
Immigration is an unfathomably evil invasion that threatens our nations security and our sovereignty and [blah blah fascist claptrap blah...]
... unless The Economy says no, then nevermind.
-administration that demands to be taken seriously
There are definitely more people responsible for this than the one person who pulled a trigger, but he certainly is responsible for that. Being manipulated is not the same as being forced to do something.
a) Those moral objections aren't going to be worth much when you get put in a high pressure moment by your shithead bosses and your training kicks in and you're just following orders because everything happened so fast
b) These soldiers are human beings who have a fundamental human rights not to be enslaved to their job. If serving in Donald Trump's army is causing them psychological torment (and how could it not), they should be allowed to leave.
c) If enough people leave, it's going to start to degrade the capacity of the American government to ~~martial~~ marshall force, and that's a good thing for us.
it doesn't really matter what the letters stand for.
This is American English we're talking about here, so of course the answer is ridiculously convoluted and involves everyone getting it wrong for so long that wrong eventually became right
It was originally an initialism used in U.S. Army paperwork for items made of galvanized iron.[2] The earliest known instance in writing is from either 1906[3] or 1907.[2]
During World War I, U.S. soldiers took to referring to heavy German artillery shells as "G.I. cans".[2][3] During the same war, "G.I.", reinterpreted as "government issue"[2] or "general issue",[3] began being used to refer to any item associated with the U.S. Army,[3] e.g., "G.I. soap".[3] Other reinterpretations of "G.I." include "garrison issue" and "general infantry".[3]
The earliest known recorded instances of "G.I." being used to refer to an American enlisted man as a slang term are from 1935.[2] In the form of "G.I. Joe" it was made better known due to it being taken as the title of a comic strip by Dave Breger in Yank, the Army Weekly, beginning in 1942.[2] A 1944 radio drama, They Call Me Joe, reached a much broader audience. It featured a different individual each week, thereby emphasizing that "G.I. Joe" encompassed U.S. soldiers of all ethnicities.[4] They Call Me Joe reached civilians across the U.S. via the NBC Radio Network and U.S. soldiers via the Armed Forces Radio Network. Gen. Dwight Eisenhower would notably reference the term "G.I. Joe," who he described as the main hero of World War II, in his May 1945 V-E address.
A source familiar with the matter tells ABC News that two of those shot are state Sen. John Hoffman of Champlin and state Rep. Melissa Hortman of Brooklyn Park
Why these two? I did a search for recent news articles about them and nothing notable jumped out at me, but hitting two Democratic state lawmakers feels too coincidental to just be dumb spree killing.
Conversely, I should not be required to show my face to anyone if I'm not trying to assert authority over them. Being a public servant means having a public identity, being a private citizen means you have the freedom to make choices about what you share.