this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23036 readers
136 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In terms of theory, I don't consider myself well read. Theory is often really tough for me to read. Even with very easy-to-read writers like Michael Parenti, it's dense with mindblowing info. And things like the book Will to Change by Bell Hooks hits me in really raw feelings so I stopped at the first chapter. I need the easiest authors and their easiest-to-read works, or else I'm just not reading.

-Micahel Parenti: What’s a Slum? Urban Poverty and Marginality in America

-"I Have a Dream, a Blurred Vision" by Michael Parenti"

-Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth

No idea how I got through "Friendly Feudalism." I read these all about 3.5 years ago before I lost the bandwidth to go further.


Edit: I tend to watch things more so I guess you can add video links after everything else too.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

You may like this Marxist-Leninist intro list I made. Rather than just recommending a bunch of good works, it's formatted to build up on itself over time, so you are more prepared for the later works by reading the earlier ones. Might fix your momentum obstacle!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

It's not theory per se, but The Dispossessed by Ursula K Le Guin just describes the value system of a socialist society without big words or sweeping statements.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If there was a ratio of how dense and vitally important the information is, and how short and easy it is to read, pretty much anything Stalin wrote.

Foundations of Marxism Leninism, Dialectical and Historical Materialism, Marxism and the National Question, all good examples.

Complex ideas laid bare in simple terms, I read Critique of the Goetha Programme by Marx first then State and Revolution by Lenin and then Foundations of Marxism-Leninism and it was helpful like honing a blade.

But I think it would have been easier going backwards.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stalin's writing style is also just really relaxed, clear, and patient. Very different from how the West depicts him.

“In the so called mistakes of Stalin lies the difference between a revolutionary attitude and a revisionist attitude. You have to look at Stalin in the historical context in which he moves, you don’t have to look at him as some kind of brute, but in that particular historical context. I have come to communism because of daddy Stalin and nobody must come and tell me that I mustn’t read Stalin. I read him when it was very bad to read him. That was another time. And because I’m not very bright, and a hard-headed person, I keep on reading him. Especially in this new period, now that it is worse to read him. Then, as well as now, I still find a Series of things that are very good.”

-Che Guevara

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

He was a published poet, after all.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

It's 2025 the trans woman with a unicorn profile picture is telling you to read Stalin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why Socialism? The author? Albert Einstein.

But really, it actually is good and easily approachable. Liberals can read it and understand it without having to agonize over its meaning ir challenges.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's good, don't get me wrong, but it's effectively the definition of the concept of socialist memes being long winded

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Blackshirts and Reds is a must read stalin-approval

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm not sure if you'd consider it theory, but The Principles of Communism is a great document to send to someone who knows nothing about communism: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

is a great document to send to someone who knows nothing about communism

same with Socialism: Utopian and Scientific

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My ADHD ass made it through Parenti's Blackshirts and Reds, and I re-read Steinbeck's Grapes of Wrath 20 years after high school and had it finally click, so there's that

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Every leftist needs to read Grapes of Wrath. Steinbeck cooked. fidel-salute-big

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Combat Liberalism is so short and impactful I think it's a must read. It will take you 5 minutes

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

honestly this one is for people who already are bought into socialism tbh, not great for beginners or liberals. It makes a lot of assumptions and has axioms that would seem like a leap for a liberal who doesn't already subscribe to our tenets

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Today I learned I am a liberal

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Combat Liberalism fits in a Reddit comment. Use that as you will.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean the communist manifesto was pretty easy to understand tbh. State and Revolution wasn't so bad either

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I don't know if there are annotated versions of state and revolution, because I remember it referencing what would be common knowledge/current events in early 20th century Russia, but that it wouldn't be so easy to get now

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon is one i found quite easy to read.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's very emotionally charged, especially if you're at the intersection of different oppressions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree, but i think that's what made it easier to read for me. Validating all of these thoughts and feelings i've had for years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Oh definitely. It's just that it can be retraumatizing sometimes. Or just make you so angry you put the book down and need to take a walk to calm yourself down.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

No. It wasn't horribly difficult, but I found it slow and required a lot of reflection.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I dunno, i barely graduated high school, dropped out of college, and work as a tradesman. Maybe I found it easy just because it made a million different thoughts and contradictions in my head click, and i just tore through it. Time for a reread, i guess.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Communist Manifesto was of course easy, and I thought there's been some feminist-Marxist stuff on the abolition of family and the like. I remember that clicking pretty fast. I think Engels also wrote a piece like that?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I think Engels also wrote a piece like that?

Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

The first time I came into contact with the manifesto it was in audio book form. I think this made far more approachable.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Lenin's State and Revolution was surprisingly accessible. The Conquest of Bread is another good one that's very easy and you can really appreciate Kropotkin's passion for wanting to free his fellow man. Anything Parenti is a smooth read, imo; Blackshirts and Reds, Inventing Reality being tops.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Blackshirts and Reds, on Comlib. State and Revolution on Prolewiki, and The Conquest of Bread on Standard Ebooks (couldn't find it on the Anarchists library in the few seconds I used to search so went for Standard Ebooks, lol).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Oh, and I don't know if I'd count Jakarta Method as Theory, but it's an important read and accessibly written.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Came in here to say that blackshirts and reds was an incredible read

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh look practically bait for me so I can go start my 10th epub (I just started the 9th)

 

I'm just gonna give myself the award in preparation fell-for-it-again-award

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Nah, this one: order-of-lenin

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does Fischers Capitalist Realism count?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

One Piece was a pretty easy read. Long though

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Harry Potter by JK Rowling

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I just started reading Planet Of Slums by Mike Davis and it’s easy albeit depressing. It’s not theory per se

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›