this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
56 points (72.2% liked)

Technology

71666 readers
3658 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Published: October 31, 2024

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 103 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

This is a puff peice to distract. Microsoft has made no effort to lessen their carbon footprint.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Technically it just makes their carbon footprint even larger

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah this is like people who think they’re “saving money” when they go shopping because there’s a sale. You didn’t save money. You spent it. You just might’ve spent more (depending on the store because a lot of them mark things up just to mark them back to full price)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I recently had a tour of the Redmond campus. They have multiple geothermal wells for power as well as an air conditioning system that uses almost no energy, it was pretty neat.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Too bad all that cool stuff is negligible compared to what actually makes a difference

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

With huge campuses some business have, I wouldn't call it negligible. Unless you yourself are running a huge business campus and have some insight on how these noobs should be doing it. 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Like starting up a nuclear power plant to avoid burning fossil fuels?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Like making a datacenter so hungry it needs an obsolete nuclear plant, yeah. They should be building new nuclear for existing datacenters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

The nuclear plant isn’t obsolete… it’s a PWR and with modern fuel cell designs it can reach the same efficiency as modern plants

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Not supporting Microsoft, but didn't they just lease out a nuclear power plant to reduce their carbon emissions?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Three Mile Island, and they want to do it to power their AI development. Not move their current servers and infrastructure to the nuclear power grid.

And the owner of Three Mile Island, who's working with Microsoft, is trying to get the fed to give him the money needed to get the plant running again. Taxpayer money for Microsoft's AI project that they'll reap all the reward from.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Working on reactivating Three Mile Island.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, greenwashing. Thanks Microsoft.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Wood colored concrete 🤔!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Should have been wood on used tires!

[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Slash emissions by using the dead bodies of the source that removes carbon?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I mean, that's the mechanism by which carbon is removed. It goes into tree, tree dies or gets cut down taking all the solidified carbon with it, new tree gets planted in its place to repeat the cycle. In fact, the fastest way to scrub carbon with the practice is to farm trees, assuming you do it sustainably.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (4 children)

You mean sequestered, not removed. It's one fire away from being back in circulation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Well, don’t set any data centers on fire.

[–] RisingSwell 2 points 7 months ago

But what if I really want to :(

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Noted for the future.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

So is every tree

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you propose some alchemy that transforms carbon to another element? Remove carbon from the atmosphere and stop putting more up in there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

graph of binding energy per nucleon for stable nuclei

And gives some energy (and building material) in the process? Yeah, it's just kinda hard.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Only the current generation of trees. The previous generations that have been broken down into soil are mostly not going back into the atmosphere as co2

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So the best thing you can do with a tree, is to cut it down and use it as materials, if we want to release as little CO2 as possible?

And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

Hence farming trees...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yes. Growing a tree from sapling to a giant trunk removes significantly more carbon from the atmosphere than an existing trunk sitting there at mass, unable to store much more carbon.

And yes, that's why I clarified that new trees would need to be planted, right on the money.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Trees are carbon neutral. They pull the carbon out and sequester it in themselves. When they rot or burn, the carbon is returned.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Talk about putting lipstick on a pig…

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No no. Those trees died of natural causes. /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Wood is a carbon sink.

Growing trees and building things out of them is good. Trees are renewable.

We ought not be cutting down forests for it BUT farmed wood is actually a good building material.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If they really cared about carbon emissions, they would shut down all of their AI crap.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Shut down themselves even better.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What does a datacenter need a huge glass front for? Slashing carbon emissions? Yeah right.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Maybe it's meant to let the sun in and save on the heating... in... a buildind that has significant excess of... nevermind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Clients looking to rent data center space still like to see pretty spaces in their giant concrete boxes. So on a campus there is usually one of the builds that has something prettier for the front admin section.

But square footage is money, so it's much smaller.

They actually go for LEED certification for their spaces a lot of times. So they get an energy efficiency badge for a building that uses the total power of a ~3500 homes (in the builds I have seen) 24/7/365.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Wood? You mean Fire's Favourite Food?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Fire suppression systems, and fire prevention mechanisms, are no joke in a data center.

Plenty of systems that displace oxygen in the room to prevent combustion.

Many places won't let you even bring combustable materials into the data center spaces. Receiving department unboxes and puts cardboard right into the baler. Wanna store stuff in your cage? Better be in a tote.

Also, humidity is strictly controlled to prevent static buildup.

The most likely place for a fire to break out in a data center would be from battery backup systems. But at the scale that most large facilities have, there is a dedicated battery room, or they use something else for instantaneous load transfer, like flywheels.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

I've also put wood panels on my car to save the environment. It's pretty useful.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

LOL they are trying to trick us. Microsoft we see you.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So lots of heat plus combustible material.. That sounds like a winning idea to me.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

If memory serves right, one of Germany's datacenters went up in flames a few years ago because they had wooden flooring and no adequate fire suppression systems.

EDIT: it was in France, and Europe's biggest datacenter.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Ah, seems to be right, my bad.

Also, to correct myself a bit more: it was Europe's biggest datacenter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Woot! Heavy timber construction!