It's more so the frame of this post, laced run-ons with poor punctuation and grammar, with a bunch of non-sense.
Not to say he normally doesn't speak in non-sense.
This reminds me of a lot of half baked Facebook posts I've seen, how is this coming from the President of the United States?
Websites you visit can port scan your entire network bypassing most firewall rules and NAT
Wut?
Oh my bad, I misunderstood your question initially. Yes, Out-File will wait for the previous command to finish just like Out-Null.
I'm not at all computer, but I believe Out-Null is used as "don't give me any output", Out-File is used as "put the output in this file", and Out-Host is similar to the standard output in the terminal.
What I would do is something like this (I'm not at a computer to test this):
Copy-Item "$SourceRoot\$SourceFolder\$SourceFile" -Destination "$DestinationRoot\$DestinationFolder" -Verbose *>&1 | Out-File -FilePath "$LogFile" -Append ; if(Test-Path "$DestinationRoot\$DestinationFolder\$SourceFile"){ Write-Host "Success!" } else { Write-Host "Failed!!!" }
Or if you want the actual output, this will store the result to the file and the screen/host:
Copy-Item "$SourceRoot\$SourceFolder\$SourceFile" -Destination "$DestinationRoot\$DestinationFolder" *>&1 | Tee-Object -FilePath "$LogFile" -Append | Out-Host
This is the way
Agreed. Companies buying Chrome to make it a hyper target ad source sounds like a terrible idea, most tech people will just flock to a browser that doesn't do that (at least the ones who haven't already).
will no longer have to report as much detailed, public crash information to the federal government
I feel like this is more incentive not to purchase one, than to purchase one
view more: next ›
Not sure if I'm missing something here, but that scans ports on the localhost, it is not a port scan of your entire network. While that's still crazy and not something you want, it's not quite what you initially said, and I don't believe they'd be able to scan outside of your machine