vanderbilt

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact this is how I learned a coworker pegged her husband. He wasn’t gay, but had no interest in topping her either. C’est la vie.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I took can make up fanciful ideas that don’t pass the smell test.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

My plan is to wait a few months for the software quality to mature, then migrate from my Deck to this one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yup, $100 too much and I get what out of it? I have a 12 Pro and there hasn’t been a single compelling feature in the past 3 generations.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Start job hunting now. By the sound of it they are one of those PE firms that zombie walk every acquisition into mediocrity.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Ultimately Linus’ opinion here does not matter in the positive. He can say Rust in kernel is good, but that does not summon the skill and work to make it happen. He can say it’s bad and quash it, at the potential expense of Linux’s future. His position of avoiding an extreme is a pragmatic one. “Let them come if they may, and if they do not it was less a loss for us.”

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Fact is Rust isn’t ready for every part of the kernel. C/Rust interop is still a growing pain for Linux and troubleshooting issues at the boundary require a developer to be good at both. It’s an uphill battle, and instead of inciting flame wars they could have fostered cooperation around the parts of the kernel that were more prepared. While their work is appreciated and they are incredibly talented, the reality is that social pressures are going to dictate development. At the end of the day software is used by people. Their expectations are not law, but they do need addressed to preserve public opinion.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

I’ve been second guessing WP deployments as well, but I think the most likely outcome is a community fork once Mullenweg’s brain rot affects commercial interests too much.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In your second link it contradicts what you say about it not mattering if it’s true, right below the section you quoted:

“If the act relates to matters of public interest and has been conducted solely for the benefit of the public, the truth or falsity of the alleged facts shall be examined, and punishment shall not be imposed if they are proven to be true. (See Article 230-2 of the Criminal Code). Article 32 of the Criminal Code provides for the Statute of Limitations for filing a criminal action for defamation which shall prescribe in ten (10) years.”

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The mistake was applying logic to a position they didn’t use logic to arrive at. Their talking heads say renewables bad. The thought process ended there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Maybe. The average Joe looks at the price tag and makes up their mind, but it’s a trap. You also have to factor in the support costs. IT staff, device insurance, breach costs, etc. A device costs much more (2x, 3x or even more) than what you pay the OEM on the PO. The biggest sink is the human costs of supporting the fleet. Macs have higher capex but lower opex. In the end I see savings between 20-40% for well fitted clients.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s not for every org or team. I often work with small IT teams to provide the expertise until they are able to gain the institutional knowledge themselves. It’s usually a slow process, with transitions on the scale of years for the large companies.

 

Hi, I'd like to make a request for c/therapists.

The community and its sole moderator, Wonder, have been inactive for about two years now. I'd like to revitalize the space and try to encourage activity.

Can I be made the moderator of this community, given the circumstance?

view more: next ›