thebartermyth

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Can we also have a com for gossip gossip - like about people IRL and life drama? Sorry if this is a weird ask.

I blocked both tanks cause there are bad posts there, and I don't want to read the bad posts even if people are dunking on them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

bump amber whataboutism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

bump amber whataboutism

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

I looked up their WY SOS filing, and yeah this is almost definitely an S-Corp. (S for small). That status is already an protectionist measure: it bypasses the corporate tax level so long as xyz conditions are met. One of those conditions is having no foreign ownership. ('nonresident alien'). I don't even really mean this as a hypocrisy gotcha, the whole article's vibe is propaganda by juxtaposing two forms of corporatist protectionism and setting the pre-justification for raising prices.

Also the focus on racist cowboy garbage and electoralism disguises how important this stuff can be. Like I have no idea what the price of 10-gallon hats is because it doesn't matter in the way that food or electricity or rent does. The target audience is libs who will say "haha maga ppl won't be able to buy their 10-gallon hats anymore if trump wins but they're so brainwashed that they support him anyway haha" It's just ridiculously condescending.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tariffs would make it harder for people to distinguish between price increase for the sake of profit and price increases from supply chain inflation. This makes it easier for large businesses to charge more and consolidate out the smaller players in an industry. It's a short/medium term solution to the tendency of the rate of profit to fall. This is just crocodile tears from an entirely irrelevant intermediary capitalist, presumably to get some kind of cushy small-business tariff exemption or tax credit.

Also the Tax Foundation is a very right wing (libertarian?) lobbying group who should not be taken seriously for any opinions on any topics.

Sellers Inflation the-podcast

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not either, but they're commemorative stamps from the 80s.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's not really worth it to cut these stamps off and save them, but these stamps are like $1+ each.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

Definitely any indoor public space, I'll ask friends if I'm going to theirs, and outside it depends.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Hopefully you'll be reassured to learn that McKinsey & Company is one of the larger industry players.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Thanks haha but for opsec reasons it has to be a joke.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

bump amber whataboutism

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

bump amber whataboutism

 

Gotta be one of the most cynical and villainous recent euphemisms. At least top 5. I haven't seen it recently though which is good.

 

Thank you comrade Bandcamp in your war on terrible mumbly guitar music.

 

Never meet your heroes that you learned about from a couple of quotes online and never think about until you're watching the Vietnam-Obama episode with your family and getting increasingly skeptical and nervous.

 

The family is one of the largest land-owning families in the state of Oklahoma and the United States. In 2017, the family owned 433,000 acres according to The Land Report magazine. In 2022, the family was the largest land-owning family in Osage County, owning about 9% of the county.

Drummond became known for her blog, The Pioneer Woman, which documented her life in rural Oklahoma.

agony-consuming

Yes, I know I'm a million years late to learning about this. I don't watch TV.

 

For the record I don't think this would matter or anything, but it would be fun to pretend to be a single issue voter about this.

 

I promise this is not trying to have a hot-take or anything. I don't understand what I'm supposed to be getting out of the book. I've read like 3/4ths of it now and it seems like mostly normal pretty standard speeches and government stuff.

Some parts gave me a pang of sadness realizing this is what a competent government would look like, especially in the beginning sections where it's like "we should eliminate poverty starting with rural extreme poverty" because I know that they succeeded. It's kinda a reminder that these are problems that could be solved and it's not utopian to believe things could be better.

But most of the book seems to be "we should ensure peaceful, cooperative, and friendly relationships with other countries and expand existing trade relationships....". + Belt and Road stuff.

I understand that this is a collection of speeches rather than a book about ideology or a textbook, but is there something I'm supposed to be getting out of this that I'm not? Sorry that this question is really open ended.

 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›