sovietknuckles

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If Democrats hadn't cheated in 2016, Bernie would have won in 2016 and 2020.

If Democrats hadn't cheated in 2020, Bernie would have won in 2020 and 2024.

Simple as

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

reddit-logo is being normal

Title: Hasan claims he had troubles entering the US because people make videos showing his content

He says he chooses his words very carefully, so why would he care if his content is widely shared and repeated? Either he stands by what he says, or he doesn't.

Instead of blaming YouTubers for "working with" the Trump admin, take a more critical look at your own rhetoric.

The slop tubbers that are using your own words?

This also brings up a good question: you are rich enough to peace the fuck out of America (a place that you hate). Why stay? Move to Canada or somewhere else in the world. I don’t understand why you would stay in America.

You can still shit in America from England or somewhere.

Last thing, Hey Hasan I’m sure you are reading this. Hopefully you don’t put the mask back up again. Say it with your chest, at least people will respect you for that

Insert sowing/reaping meme here

Send em to CECOT.

Good if true, but its not. Hes just a baby.

As a Turkish American naturalized citizen who abhors MAGA, I would have no qualms if Hasan had a one way trip to El Salvador. He is the walking textbook definition of a fifth columnist. He is more fanatical about Hamas than the average Palestinian.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

floss.social is a Mastodon instance for people who care about, support, and build Free, Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS). It has 787 monthly users.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That's true. I cross-posted from r/Hasan_Piker, but I should have been more critical of the source. I'll delete it now

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Probably just renaming Gaza to Palestine because "without the presence of Hamas" is unenforceable if Palestine has autonomy. They didn't say anything about independence or autonomy, so his goal might be to turn Gaza into another 2-state solution like the West Bank.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He's not interested in Palestinian emancipation. Maybe he's doubling down on not enabling Netanyahu unless he gets something in return, unlike Biden

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

sankara-salute Thanks for all of your hard work, @[email protected], regardless of what happens in the future.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He removed the "no naming instances" rule right after removing this post

You’re right, it is against the rules, so it does need removed. That being said, I can’t remember why we made that rule in the first place, so from now on it’s off the sidebar.

Also, I think it’s not really all that clever to compare the Stasi to the Nazis. The Stasi were (forgive the industry parlance) fucking assholes, but I don’t remember them being part of a literal state-sponsored industrial genocide machine.

Now rule 4 just says

  1. We don’t talk about rule #4.
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

do-something You know what to do, Ras, balkanize Newark

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The [email protected] mod removed this post for the reason you cited.

But because Hexbear banned _cryptagion, [email protected]'s only mod, 3 months ago, his mod actions don't federate back to Hexbear, and this post stays up on our side

Apparently he's been posting to [email protected] about Hexbear ever since his ban, we just can't see it from here

Screenshot of tankiejerk posts

 

Don't bother with opsec, I printed them off in high DPI

13
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

[CW: Vox]

 

This month, there are some clinical results for a mucosal next generation Covid vaccine – the 30th mucosal vaccine on my list of mucosal vaccines that have gone into clinical trial. Plus, I’ve added over a dozen preclinical reports to my collection, including more results showing prevention of transmission or durable immunity. And an intranasal vaccine based on an agent called a STING agonist showed strong protection from other coronaviruses, as well as protection against transmission.

News from US Project NextGenAs well as funding trials of next generation Covid vaccines, Project NextGen is funding research on the correlates of protection from authorized vaccines (studying levels of antibodies etc associated with effective vaccination). To try to ensure a group of participants that is more diverse than is usual for clinical trials based in hospitals and universities, they announced this month a pharmacy-based initiative to broaden access. About 20 Walgreens pharmacies in urban, suburban, and rural areas will be clinical trial sites, and “To recruit study volunteers, Walgreens will provide information on how and where to participate in the study.”

This decentralized trial will also get technical and other support from the Fred Hutch Cancer Center – and the Center has also been funded to support some of the next generation vaccine trials.

In other Project NextGen news, Castlevax – who will be running one of the phase 2b “mini-efficacy” trials for their intranasal vaccine – announced they received additional funding for that trial.

Finally, last update, I reported that a mucosal vaccine developed by the NIH’s NIAID was entering a phase 1 trial. Soon after, the NIH announced that recruitment had begun, and that this was the first Project NextGen-funded clinical trial.

Mucosal vaccine newsThis month, I added a 30th mucosal vaccine that has gone into clinical trial. (I missed this one when it went into a clinical trial in China last year.) It’s an intranasal viral vector vaccine called Ad5-S-Omicron BA.1, based on adenovirus 5, and Omicron. The developers reported some results for 8 people in the phase 1 trial, along with a transmission study in mice.

The people in the clinical trial had been vaccinated with other vaccines at least 6 months before getting 2 doses of nasal spray. The developers tested their people’s blood and nasal fluids to see if they showed signs of immune response to new Omicron variants.

Nasal immunoglobulin, they reported, “retained potent neutralization” against all the Covid variants they tested, though serum immunoglobulins did not for all of them.

The developers then tested the impact on mice of intranasal application of the vaccinated people’s immunoglobulin. There were 4 groups of mice getting different immunoglobulin, and a control group getting immunoglobulin from people who did not have the intranasal vaccine. The mice getting the vaccinated people’s nasal immunoglobulin “showed a significant and comparable reduction in viral load.”

More new preclinical results:

I’ve added 7 preclinical reports on results for another 5 mucosal vaccines to my collection since the last update, with one reported below in the pancoronavirus vaccine category. The others include:

  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institue of Medical Science and Toko Yakuhin Kogyo Co (Japan): This vaccine is a protein subunit mixed with carboxyvinyl polymer (CVP), tested intranasally in mice. The developers reported levels of longterm efficacy (at least 15 months).

  • Friedrich Loeffler Institute (Germany) and University of Bern (Switzerland): This report is for genome-modified live-attenuated vaccines, tested as a single intranasal dose in mice and hamsters. For one of them, unimmunized hamsters put in contact with immunized animals after a Covid challenge test had minimal viral RNA in nasal washings and no signs of the virus in organs.

  • Ohio State University (USA): This group developed several versions of viral vector vaccine based on 3 Covid variants. The viral vectors were measles and mumps components of the MMR vaccine. The developers reported on testing these intranasally in mice and hamsters.

Pancoronavirus vaccine newsPancoronavirus vaccines aim to provide protection not only from variants of the SARS virus that causes Covid, but also against the next new coronavirus to spread among humans. This month, 3 vaccines have joined this category, all from the US.

NanoSTING-SN: A mucosal protein subunit vaccine from the University of Houston and Auravax (USA)

NanoSTING is the name for a mucosal adjuvant that is a STING agonist, a class of agents that can stimulate immune activity. (STING stands for stimulator of interferon genes.) Different versions of this vaccine were tested in mice and hamsters.

Hamsters got 2 intranasal doses of the SN version, and then had a challenge test with the Delta variant, along with an unvaccinated group. The vaccinated hamsters had reduced viral loads, and by day 6, no virus was detectable.

The developers did a transmission study using the SN version in hamsters. One group had sham immunization, and a group of 8 hamsters had 2 intranasal doses of SN, 21 days apart. The immunized hamsters were challenged with an Omicron variant on day 35, and a day later, each was co-housed with an unimmunized hamster.

The vaccine protected the 8 hamsters from getting sick, and only 2 showed a low amount of virus in lung and nasal tissue. No virus was detected in any of the contact hamsters. The experiment was repeated with a single intranasal dose: This also prevented transmission.

The developers tested blood from mice vaccinated with the SN version and found signs of immune response to a group of other coronaviruses, including the original SARS and MERS, as well as an alphacoronavirus.

Then, a group of vaccinated and unvaccinated mice were challenged with the original SARS. The unvaccinated mice showed signs of illness, but the vaccinated ones did not, and all survived.

Finally, the developers vaccinated 3 primates (rhesus macaques) with 2 intranasal doses, 28 days apart. Signs of immune response were consistent with those of the mice.

This is the fourth preclinical report for this vaccine – all records here.

A protein subunit vaccine from Georgia State University (USA)

Four versions of this vaccine were tested. One of them, based on the Delta variant, showed signs of protection from all the Covid variants tested. Immunized mice were also protected in challenge experiments with the Delta variant, and the original SARS.

This is the second preclinical report for this vaccine – the first is here.

A protein subunit vaccine from Baylor College of Medicine (USA)

This vaccine aims to provide protection from betacoronaviruses, and is based on components of the original SARS, MERS, and an Omicron variant. The vaccine was tested in mice. The mice showed signs of response to all of those viruses, as well as betacoronaviruses that are currently only infecting bats.

62
covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov is shutting down (covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

The final update of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines was on February 29, 2024. PDFs of the Guidelines can be downloaded until August 16, 2024, when the website will be shut down.

Not that the site was very good. Their Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection page mentions masks once on the whole page and does not mention nasal sprays:

The risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission can be reduced by covering coughs and sneezes, wearing a well-fitted mask around others, and isolating when experiencing symptoms. Frequent handwashing also effectively reduces the risk of infection.

Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent COVID-19.

Older versions of their PDF mention N95s. The only mention of N95s, other than recommending them for healthcare workers, is to claim that surgical masks are just as good:

There is evidence from studies of viral diseases, including SARS, that both surgical masks and N95 respirators reduce the risk of transmission.6 Moreover, surgical masks are probably not inferior to N95 respirators for preventing the transmission of respiratory viral infections; a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the protective effects of medical masks and N95 respirators demonstrated that the use of medical masks did not increase the incidence of laboratory- confirmed viral respiratory infections (including coronavirus infections) or clinical respiratory illness.

(That is incorrect.) The latest version does not mention the existence of N95s or KN95s, it just says "a well-fitted mask". And N95s and KN95s are not mentioned on the site itself, outside of these PDFs.

20
Here's how Biden can still win (assets.toots.matapacos.dog)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

post-hog

 

Evangelical Christians are the largest pro-Israel lobby in the US

 

Mucosal vaccines go directly into the mucosal tissue where infection begins – for example, intranasally or via tablets. If they could induce strong enough mucosal immunity, such vaccines could reduce the risk of infection and transmission. That’s often called “sterilizing” immunity.

Development of these vaccines has just received a massive boost. A global consortium is being funded to develop and then run human challenge trials of intranasal or inhaled vaccines in a program called MusiCC. A human challenge trial – where participants are quarantined and deliberately infected in that controlled environment – could find out quickly and definitively establish whether or not particular vaccines can prevent infection and transmission. If very effective vaccines are tested in this program, it would vault them rapidly through development stages that could otherwise take years.

As well, the US Government’s Project NextGen is calling for interest in developing and/or supporting oral Covid vaccines. This pair of new initiatives kick off this month’s update.

There is also some news from clinical trials for 2 intranasal vaccines, as well as development news on 2 vaccines in the “variant-proof” category, and several preclinical studies.

New development initiatives for mucosal vaccines

In the last few weeks, 2 initiatives aiming to boost the development of mucosal vaccines have been announced – a global human challenge trial program to be led by Imperial College London for inhaled and intranasal vaccines, and a request from US Project NextGen for parties interested in developing or supporting oral Covid vaccines.

Human challenge program: Mucosal Immunity in human Coronavirus Challenge (MusiCC)

This is a new 5-year program led by Imperial College London to speed development and access to mucosal coronavirus vaccines by running placebo-controlled human challenge trials. That involves trying to infect volunteers under controlled conditions, which means trials that can establish whether infection is blocked can be completed quickly, with fewer volunteers than a standard trial.

MusiCC is supported with $57 million from the European Union and CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations). A global consortium of more than a dozen teams and organizations specializing in human challenge studies will be involved. They are interested in inhaled and intranasal vaccines that could block transmission of betacoronaviruses (the virus group including Covid and MERS). The program “includes a commitment that any vaccines developed are made available first and at an affordable price to the most vulnerable populations.”

From the announcement: “Using harmonised standard operating procedures, the trials will take place across several sites in the UK, Europe, the United States and Singapore and will each involve a small group of young, healthy volunteers. In the challenge trial, volunteers will first receive either a dose of an investigational vaccine designed to provide mucosal coronavirus immunity or placebo before being intentionally exposed to a calibrated dose of SARS-CoV-2. A model using a seasonal coronavirus called OC43 is also being developed for similar use.”

The first step is deciding on which variant of SARS-CoV-2 will be used, and then developing a version that can be used in the trials. Imperial College London has done this before. Their team published the results of a Covid human challenge trial with 36 people to test the process. They were able to infect just over half the participants with a version of the original virus (wild type).

The UK government provided funding for that original program, which was announced in October 2020. The trial got the regulatory green light to start in February 2021, and the first participants had left quarantine by March. The government funding for the whole program of which that trial was part, was £33.6 million – in pounds sterling for comparison, this new program is £44 million.

We don’t know yet which vaccines might be involved. Other than Imperial College London, the only other organization named in CEPI’s announcement is University of Antwerp’s Vaccinopolis. A statement from Imperial College London mentions a London hub for trials, and studying the biology of respiratory infection with the National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID) in Singapore.

New preclinical results for mucosal vaccines

I’ve added 3 preclinical reports on results for mucosal vaccines to my collection since the last update:

  • Vaxart (USA): This is a viral vector vaccine, and a tablet form is one of the vaccines with Project NextGen funding for a phase 2 trial. The latest study tested 3 versions of the vaccine intranasally in primates, and included a group that received an injection and an intranasal dose. (Records in my collection for this vax here.)

  • Chengdu Kanghua Biological Products (China): This is also a viral vector vaccine. A study tested an intranasal version in mice, as standalone vaccine or booster.

  • Osaka University (Japan): This live attenuated virus vaccine was tested in intranasally in hamsters.

23
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

The race for next generation vaccines is steadily heating up now. And this month, we’ve passed a major milestone: The first data suggesting that an already-authorized nextgen vaccine could outperform the BNT/Pfizer vaccine – with its manufacturers ramping up production facilities for potentially wide distribution in the next year or so.

Most vaccines that reach first-in-human trials don’t make it all the way to major regulator approval. The odds improve, though, for those that make it to mid-stage trials (phase 2). On top of that, there’s a lot of variation in effectiveness between vaccines – so a good range of approaches reaching that mid-stage increases the odds of having much better vaccines.

Though it’s not going at the blistering pace of the early pandemic, the scene is encouraging now. The number of next generation vaccines moving past first-in-human trials is into double digits. With another 2 pancoronavirus vaccines starting clinical trials this month, there’s even a handful of vaccines reaching the early stage at least in this tough category. And the body of clinical evidence seems to be growing steadily, too: We’ve been getting at least some results for an average of 2 clinical trials a month for the last 6 months.

It’s still early days in many ways, though. Even for late-stage trials, most of the efficacy data is for signs of immunity only. We don’t know critical things, especially whether or not there will be mucosal vaccines that can make a major – and lasting – impact on getting and transmitting infection in people. But at least it looks as though more durable boosters are on the horizon.

There’s a lot to get to this month for all types of vaccines, including news from clinical trials for 3 vaccines. This update starts with news from Project NextGen, with funding for another mini-efficacy trial for a mucosal vaccine. After that, I have recent results broken down into 3 categories of next-generation Covid vaccines (definitions below).

News from US Project NextGen

A fourth vaccine received funding in late January – for a phase 2b clinical trial for the oral vaccine from Vaxart. As with the others, the trial is to be for 10,000 participants. This vaccine has released phase 1 trial results, as well as a press release for phase 2 in 2022. The vaccine was later adapted for variants, and it was reportedly on hold as they were developing a pancoronavirus vaccine. (Records in my collection for this vax here.)

This brings the number of Project NextGen-funded trials to 5.

New preclinical results for mucosal vaccines

I’ve added 7 preclinical reports on results for mucosal vaccines to my collection since the last update. These include:

  • sCPD9 from RocketVax and Freie Universität Berlin: This is an intranasal live-attenuated vaccine. This study tested the effectiveness of preventing transmission of strains of Omicron among non-primates, comparing the intranasal RocketVax vaccine to the BNT/Pfizer vaccine.
  • Ad5.SARS-CoV-2-S1 from Gaphas Pharmaceutical and University of Pittsburgh: This is an intranasal viral vector vaccine. This study tested an Omicron-adapated booster in non-primates.
  • ChAd-SARS-CoV-2-BA.5-S from Washington University of St Louis (USA): This study includes versions of the intranasal viral vector vaccine further developed by Bharat Biotech in India and authorized there as iNCOVACC, tested in non-primates: An adaptation for the BA.5 strain of Omicron, compared to the original form, the adapted version alone, and a bivalent version (including both).
  • Unnamed vaccine from Pennsylvania State University (USA): This is an intranasal protein subunit vaccine, studied in non-primates.
 

In this News Brief we are joined by friend of the show, Maximillian Alvarez of The Real News, to discuss Democrats' pathetic, myopic, and nihilistic attempt to play the Racist Reverse Uno Card on Congressional Republicans.

view more: ‹ prev next ›