I think even with a massive re-evaluation of the dollar, that living standards could still increase for a lot of Americans. A large part of the domestic economy is based around the financialization of critical needs, like healthcare and housing, with prices grossly inflated.
Even if things generally get more expensive, so much would be improved for so many people with just guaranteed housing and the ability to go to a doctor. I don’t think the impact of that can be overstated.
It's worse, in my opinion. Landmines are fixed in place. Warnings can be put to deter people from approaching. This entirely uncontrolled, random.
It's really convenient when you train on that same media class as examples of unbiased reporting
When that child is brought up, the demons start talking about how the ratio "isn't that bad actually, surgical really", both downplaying the death of a child and immediately assuming none of the thousands of other victims aren't children as well.
The fucking animals in 
cheering this on are making me fucking furious. Even if you accept he base idea that Hezbollah is a terrorist org, and that Israel is justified in attacking them (Which I don't), it's fucking absurd to think that all of these explosions only harmed "terrorists". So many people were harmed here, and likely many more will die. Thousands were harmed by this, people just guilty of holding on to a communication device. This is such a disgusting action.
There’s competing factions in the US deep state right now. Some more invested in US hegemony are trying to force reindustrialization because they are starting to realize that finance capital has been eating away at the core productive forces required to project real military power abroad. Other factions resist this, as it cuts into the immediate profit margins, and so they awkwardly fight.
If you're meaning understanding in the sense of "Why is the Universe like this?" sure, that's an open question, but it's actually very well documented in terms of behavior and dynamics, at least in the scope used for stuff like quantum computers.
“Sorry mom, I need my Xi-bucks.”
Usable quantum computing would open a whole new class of problems to potential computation. The cryptography aspect is just talked about a lot because it’s a simple and clear “Oh wow that’s different” example. Going uncrackable encryption to crackable. There are other encryption algorithms that can still stop a quantum computer btw though. They just aren’t in use currently.
But there’s all kinds of stuff it could be potentially applied to. Hard to list out all potential use cases though, because a lot of it is stuff that you just can’t do right now lol.
This is all dependent on quantum computer with enough stability and power to be usable outside of experiments of course, which is not something that will be coming anytime soon.
To preface this, I'm not an expert in it, it's not my particular field, but I do have a bit background than most in adjacent stuff. I'm not by any means up to date in the literature on this though.
Quantum computing isn't a dead end I'd say. While the mixture of the word quantum, long term hype, and lack of big results does tend to ping that "fraud" part of the brain, there is solid scientific basis for it, and there has been small scale systems built for them. The big caveat to that is that they aren't really useful at the moment, and scaling it up will be a challenge.
In a lot of ways it's similar to fusion in that sense. It's vaporware in the sense that it's continually being hyped and still little apparent progress is being made, but it is something that I do think will be achieved some day. That day might be quite a ways in the future, but progress is being continually chipped away at here. Also, for both cases, a lot of the big challenges is in engineering. This isn't like string theory or supersymmetry, where the underlying foundations are sorta uncertain. This is solid science at the core. The question is just of course how to scale it up to a meaningful and useful level, which tends to be slow and very incremental research.
Also like fusion, I think it's something that will be continued to be researched, simply because the potential gains are massive should it succeed. A quantum computer isn't just like a faster CPU. Fundamentally quantum computation allows you to calculate problems that non-quantum computers can't, because the physics of calculation is so different. One basic example is Shor's algorithm. It's an algorithm, a set of calculation instructions basically, that would let you trivially crack one of the biggest encryption setups we currently use. This is an case that sounds bad lol, but it's a relatively easy to see example of how it opens up new computing spaces, some for more positive applications. Most of these applications will likely be less focused on end user aspects. It's not so much about making a fancy GPU for video games, and more about heavy scientific computation.
Capitalists are inevitably going to hype this up however, in the same ways they do stuff like machine learning (which also has good aspects and applications separate from the capitalist swill, but I'm digressing), because it appeals to several easy things. It's a tech solution that the average person knows almost nothing about beyond vague hype, it could hypothetically be used in ways to make the line go up harder, and the potential promise of it lends to fearmongering. If we don't do X or Y, maybe China will crack it. If we don't fund the tech billionaires, the enemy could crack super AI's etc. It's all the same bullshit.
Which is both ironic and unfortunate, aside from the obvious imperialist aspects, because stuff like Quantum Computing and Fusion are never going to reach the results people dream up without international cooperation. They are inherently big and hard problems, not the sort of thing one genius can solve. These big things that could fundamentally better humanity require humanity to work together to achieve them.
That’s bleak. Fuck.
Yeah. I don’t disagree that the transition would be rough, that there would be a reactionary tide against it. I just also think that there’s a very real underclass in a precarious position, regardless of the larger income compared to worldwide averages, simply because the base costs of living are also inflated.