this feels like a reach ngl
not a fan of pedojacketing people
One approach I've seen used is allowing AI generation in certain cases, but requiring a report on what it got wrong, and how you approached fixing/adapting things. Which is kind of a compromise of the tool existing, and trying to get people to not uncritically regurgitate output. To hypothetically position it as a tool you use in a process, instead of a solution by itself.
I don't think that's a controversial take. The US is of course the ultimate reason that Israel can exist in the way it does, and Israel is a colonial outpost of the US, but that doesn't mean it's not a symbiotic relationship. They both affect each other. The resulting direction is a mix of both political forces, sometimes in unison, sometimes in tension, but charting a path together.
It's a big fucked up loop, or maybe an intertwined tree, than a mono-directional leash.