Wish the AMA would get their shit together and do the same
osaerisxero
joined 10 months ago
Yeah, not the best case, but probably the best we could hope for given the alternatives and that they were literally fleeing into the crowd.
You're thinking about the voting problem wrong, specifically not including all of the requirements
The algorithm isn’t a black box like you’re saying, it’s fully auditable and decentralized so any fuckery is immediately visible.
Their point is that even in this system, there is both a small and finite number of people who are skilled enough/qualified enough to perform that audit. I'm not sure I've got the math to be able to validate a blockchain transaction by hand without referring to a (potentially tainted) source repo. There's a world where blockchain voting can solve this problem, but the competing requirements make it the less-optimal solution compared with paper voting.
Specifically, there are 3 potentially competing requirements for a secure voting system in a functioning democracy:
- Votes must be accurately recorded and tallied
- Votes must not be attributable to any specific individual
- Votes must be auditable for an arbitrary amount of time
Blockchains, potentially, optimize the voting problem for #1 while introducing explicit exposure in #s 2 and 3, while paper ballots optimize for 2 first, then 3.
No, they were people who were associated with the march organizers who were looking out for people doing a terrorism.
That effort was intentionally sabotaged after Lincoln's assassination. So there's that.
Site Reliability Engineering, a.k.a. the sysadmins babysitting the Big servers
send that shit over yptb, 24bugsinabigcoat did nothing wrong
That's my understanding of the gameplan
SRE always starting shit
This is 1000% funnier because of the avatar with the dog head
You dropped these: 🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅
view more: next ›
*All the slavers