livestreamedcollapse

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Edit: reddit link got taken down, mods pointed out Hebrew is right to left

I think it'd be just their 46 silos of Jericho 3 land based ICBMs that would reach LA or other furthest cities. The entity loves telling insultingly bad lies, one of which is developing a missile with a 11,500km global reach when they only claim their regional neighbors are threats. Like they wouldn't throw a nuclear tantrum when their apartheid collapses.

Besides gravity bombs, their airborne component is the golden horizon (bit telling of a name) ALBM which has ~2000km of range.

Their submarine component is pretty mid, relatively speaking; no SLBMs yet. The Dolphin 1 class is a slightly bigger German 212 class diesel electric sub with some 650mm torpedo tubes believed to be for an enlarged variant of the Delilah cruise missile. Dolphin 2 displaces 500 tonnes more due to an air independent propulsion system that gives 3-5 knots of stealthy cruising, which would take a while for a boat to get on station to launch those interceptable cruise missiles.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Khamas robbed this 35 year old widdle baby of his diapies!!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Remember to put your talent points into Greco-Roman (phallocentric). I understand you're used to shooting in on legs but that freestyle kind of wrestling would be undercutting a patriarch (gynocentric).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not to get too "um akshually" with your distinction between floatplane vs. seaplane, but I'd contest that the Otter is the best floatplane; PBY-2 Catalina best seaplane, don't tell me having one of those converted into a mobile home & chilling on a south pacific atoll isn't the dream

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Would a c/trueanon be too splitting? The TA comm on .ml seemed to never get off the ground

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also disposal of a lot of untested yet obsolescent surplus war material to make room for new equipment. Idk if ATACAMS ever got fired during the empire's prior occupations, but firing an SRBM designed for a 1990s European cold war gone hot at Iraqis would probably seem wasteful for even the bloodthirstiest general

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I'm sure the shock of .50AE to the dome would obscure dental records

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

"and then, something maize happened..."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Lmao this guy shot himself with a desert eagle?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

John Halo: "Sir, permission to leave Colorado Springs."

UNSC Admiral Flynn: "What for?"

John Halo: "To give the deep state their fireworks back"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Dang the boatsman is gonna kill me in this realm, then drown me in the Styx to send me to super-Hades!

 

I've been working with a shared Waters 2695 with a 2996 DAD for the past year, and another user pumped 0.2M phosphate buffered mobile phase through the instrument (with their column) about 6 months ago. This change in mobile phase originally manifested as over-pressure issues, but copious flushing with warm water and isopropanol—and backflushing my column—eventually solved those issues & the instrument has run without fault for the past 4 months.

However, I am now getting a "Plunger Homing Fault (0)" error popping up twice during the instrument's self-initialization. Once before carousel initialization (which can be dismissed) & permanently afterwards. Unfortunately the initialization is required for any direct control of the instrument. This particular error message is not described in the 2695 Separations Module manual, however the Waters support website describes this error appearing after using buffered mobile phases.

Despite the Waters support article, I'm not inclined to believe residual buffers suddenly precipitated out of thoroughly flushed fluidics, 6 months after the buffer was run through the system, and after 4 months of flawless operation without any of the previously observed pressure issues. My first fixes for this error were loosening the actuator vent during initialization, and replacing the inline filter element. Neither of these steps solved the error popup.

Other culprits discussed on other chromatography forums seem to point to a faulty F1 fuse on the solvent management system board. I tested the existing one with a multimeter and got very inconsistent resistance readings, but replacing the fuse did not solve the error during initialization.

I checked my seal wash line's prime and it appears to not have any bubbles trapped in it. Presumably it's been washing the back sides of the actuators' plungers, however being locked out from direct control, I can no longer re-prime the seal wash line.

Some other culprit parts that I've found discussed online are:

  • opening either the V2 or V3 valves manually
  • Cleaning the primary—aka "(0)"—actuator, which would require laborously removing & disassembling that unit.
  • Inspecting the check valve on the primary piston. My understanding is this is a very dust-sensitive part due to the sapphire check ball's tight tolerances for sealing shut.

Has anyone encountered this error before? What solution worked for you? I'm very much hoping I won't need to bring in a technician to rebuild the primary actuator but thinking it might come to this.

u/Micusil911: It has happened to me, usually because of the salts coming out of solution as you say after a power outage or something the only real solution is: Change the check valve as you mentioned

But if in a hurry a workaround is to open the dry purge valve until the initialization is complete, after that wash your system through Hope it helps

Thanks for the suggestions! I opened the dry purge valve about 5 full turns & initialized the HPLC, but it still threw the error twice: once before the carousels were initialized & once after.

I'm glad you think it's the check valve since that is a much easier replacement versus disconnecting & pulling out the torpedo tubes. Did you attempt to clean the check valve by sonicating in water or methanol? Or did you simply replace the part with a new OEM check valve?

u/Micusil911: I use a mixture water methanol 3:1 and sonicate until the sapphire ball rattles when shaken, otherwise replace it

u/liquidswords10304: 0 indicates problem with primary pump head. (I forget if right or left side is primary) Take it apart and clean piston/plunger, it can’t find home. Squirt di water in there on plunger and seals, it might be caked with buffer. Also check for pinched waste tubing to waste bucket. I think you can open V2 and V3 valves manually on alliance front panel.

Looks like the right side (when facing the front of the instrument) pump is the primary, left is accumulator.

I looked through the separations module operator's guide for what the commands to open V1 to V4 are, but for the life of me I can't find it! Pressing the "Menu/Status" button shows the open/closed status of these valves, but I'm unable to use the arrow keys to select any of these icons, unlike directly changing gradient, flow rate, etc. The "direct function" tab accessible from the "Menu/Status" page never mentions valve control either.

Do you know what button presses must be navigated to be able to manually open the valves? Thanks for the help!

u/liquidswords10304: Good advice! Never throw out a CV without sonicacting first to see if ruby ball rattles. If it rattles, it will work.

u/Level9TraumaCenter: I wonder if phosphoric acid would work as a last-ditch attempt to save a valve, when no replacement is handy.

view more: next ›