jimmydoreisalefty

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

Colonel Douglas Macgregor discusses why a US attack on Iran will be unsuccessful and could trigger World War 3.


Generated Summary:

Main Topic:

The potential for a US attack on Iran to trigger World War III, and the motivations and potential consequences of such an action.

Key Points:

  • Imminent Attack: Col. Macgregor believes the decision to attack Iran has already been made by President Trump, influenced heavily by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. The US is currently assembling air and naval forces for the attack.
  • Limited Impact of Initial Strikes: He argues that the impact of initial strikes is overestimated and Iran's military capabilities are far more advanced than commonly perceived.
  • Israel's Hegemony: Macgregor claims the war is about securing the Jewish state's hegemony over the region and its oil and gas resources, similar to the failed attempt to dismantle Russia.
  • US Complicity: He asserts that Netanyahu has significant control over the US Congress and influences President Trump's decisions regarding Iran.
  • Iran's Capabilities: Iran is a large, continental power, unlike previous adversaries Israel has faced. The US, primarily an air and maritime power, will face challenges in a protracted conflict.
  • Domestic Concerns: Macgregor expresses concern about the potential for domestic unrest in the US if the war goes poorly, especially given the large number of undocumented immigrants.
  • Global Opposition: He predicts that a US attack on Iran will further isolate the US on the world stage, with many countries siding with Iran.
  • Potential for Nuclear Escalation: Macgregor raises the possibility of Israel using tactical nuclear weapons in desperation, which he believes would be a grave mistake.
  • Trump's Unwavering Decision: He believes it is unlikely that President Trump will change his mind about attacking Iran, due to his impulsiveness and belief in unchallenged US power.

Highlights:

  • The speaker emphasizes the significant influence of Netanyahu over US foreign policy regarding Iran.
  • He warns of the potential for a long and costly war with Iran, with limited chances of success.
  • The discussion highlights the risk of escalation, including the potential use of nuclear weapons.
  • Macgregor criticizes the lack of public debate and Congressional oversight regarding the decision to attack Iran.

About Channel:

Glenn Diesen is a professor of Russian international affairs, with focus on geoeconomics, conservatism and the Greater Eurasia Initiative.

Professor Diesen is an academic, author, editor, and political commentator. His research focus is primarily on Russian foreign policy and the geoeconomics of Greater Eurasia and the emerging strategic partnership between Russia and China. Diesen’s latest books are Russophobia: Propaganda in International Politics (2022), Europe as the Western Peninsula of Greater Eurasia: Geoeconomic Regions in a Multipolar World (2021); Russian Conservatism: Managing Change under Permanent Revolution (2021); Great Power Politics in the Fourth Industrial Rivalry: The Geoeconomics of Technological Sovereignty (2021); The Return of Eurasia (2021); Russia in a Changing World (2020); The Decay of Western Civilisation and Resurgence of Russia: Between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft (2018); Russia’s Geoeconomic Strategy for a Greater Eurasia (2017); and EU and NATO relations with Russia: After the collapse of the Soviet Union (2015).

Again:

That seems to be the only desperate attempt at a smear people use to criticize Scott Ritter, never on his arguments or analysis.

 

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs is a world-renowned economics professor, an advisor to political leaders around the world, a bestselling author, and a global leader in sustainable development. Prof. Sachs discusses the reckless surprise attack on Iran, and the dangerous escalation as the US is making preparations to join the war.


Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The potential for US involvement in a war against Iran, focusing on Israel's role and the broader geopolitical implications.

Key Points:

  • Israel's Agenda: Jeffrey Sachs asserts that Netanyahu has a long-standing plan to draw the US into a war with Iran, aiming to dominate the Middle East and expand Israel's borders.
  • Subterfuge and Deception: Sachs suggests the possibility that the attack on Iran occurred despite ongoing negotiations, potentially as a deliberate act of deception. He criticizes the lack of honesty and consistency in public statements from governments in the US, Europe, and Israel.
  • Gangster Politics: Sachs characterizes the actions of world leaders as those of "gangsters" fighting over turf, with little regard for the consequences for ordinary citizens.
  • Failed Regime Change Strategy: He argues that Israel's strategy of assassination and regime change in the Middle East has consistently failed, leading to chaos and instability rather than desired outcomes.
  • Western Imperialism: The US, Britain, and France still operate with an imperial mindset, believing they can dictate outcomes in conflicts.
  • Biased Rhetoric: Sachs highlights the biased rhetoric from Western powers, who immediately defended Israel's "right to self-defense" after the attack on Iran, without condemning the attack itself.
  • Multipolarity and Nuclear Risk: Sachs emphasizes that the world is now multipolar, and the West no longer has the decisive advantage to control events. He warns that the escalating tensions could lead to nuclear annihilation, especially given the involvement of countries like Russia and Pakistan.
  • Evangelical Influence: Sachs notes the disturbing influence of some American Christian evangelicals who view the prospect of nuclear Armageddon as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

Highlights:

  • Sachs expresses surprise at Israel's attack on Iran, given the ongoing negotiations.
  • He uses strong language to describe the actions of world leaders, calling them "gangsters" and accusing them of lying.
  • He emphasizes the dangers of the current situation, warning of the potential for nuclear war.
  • He points out the hypocrisy and bias in the Western response to the attack on Iran.
  • He highlights the role of American Christian evangelicals in supporting Israeli extremism.

About Channel:

Glenn Diesen is a professor of Russian international affairs, with focus on geoeconomics, conservatism and the Greater Eurasia Initiative.

Professor Diesen is an academic, author, editor, and political commentator. His research focus is primarily on Russian foreign policy and the geoeconomics of Greater Eurasia and the emerging strategic partnership between Russia and China. Diesen’s latest books are Russophobia: Propaganda in International Politics (2022), Europe as the Western Peninsula of Greater Eurasia: Geoeconomic Regions in a Multipolar World (2021); Russian Conservatism: Managing Change under Permanent Revolution (2021); Great Power Politics in the Fourth Industrial Rivalry: The Geoeconomics of Technological Sovereignty (2021); The Return of Eurasia (2021); Russia in a Changing World (2020); The Decay of Western Civilisation and Resurgence of Russia: Between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft (2018); Russia’s Geoeconomic Strategy for a Greater Eurasia (2017); and EU and NATO relations with Russia: After the collapse of the Soviet Union (2015).

 

About Channel:

Analyzing War, Nat'l Security, Politics & foreign policy. Covering Breaking news with expert commentary and analysis.

4x Combat Deployer. Unintimidated & Uncompormised. Deep love for America.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30929657

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30681653

Archive Link: https://archive.is/q1LuS


Joining forces with Palestinians and allies in the struggle against Zionism

Vienna, June 13-15th, 2025

Support the Call: https://www.juedisch-antizionistisch.at/en/congress

Get your Ticket: https://www.juedisch-antizionistisch.at/en/tickets

The world watches in horror the unfolding genocide against the Palestinian people committed by Zionism in partnership with the West. It is our duty to take action, as this is done in our name. We must join our Palestinian brothers and sisters in their darkest hour, and work for freeing and decolonising Palestine! To achieve this just aim, we must have progressive organisations and individuals across the world with us, working against Zionist Apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide as the last devastating evidence of colonialism which must be terminated.

Jews and people of Jewish descent everywhere - those whom the Zionist state claims to speak for – are uniting to declare their unwavering opposition to Zionism.

Since the First Zionist Congress over a century ago, Zionism claimed to speak on behalf of all Jews, while permanently attempting to silence our opposition to its constant crimes. Jewish tradition, history and culture is totally opposed to genocide.

The impressive history of Jewish resistance to Zionism is as long as Zionism – it included religious communities as well as secular movements of Jewish descent, and the vehement Jewish opposition to the creation of the Zionist state in Palestine itself.

Zionism is a crime against Judaism and the indigenous people of Palestine, and we are committed to putting an end to it. Over the years, it became clear that Zionism, instead of protecting Jews, placed them in great danger by committing atrocious acts in their name. Zionism is based on racial supremacy, adopting the very racist assumptions which are inherent to antisemitism – describing Jews as belonging to some chosen race – a notion which is fundamentally racist and which has no relation to Judaism.

The Zionist settler-colonial entity denies Palestinians their most basic rights. Zionism operates through colonialism, apartheid, ethnic-cleansing and genocide in Palestine Even before 1948. Fourteen million Palestinians worldwide are its direct victims. To Israel we firmly declare “Not in Our Name!” We are devoted to terminating Zionism and we are devoted to the decolonisation of Palestine under Palestinian leadership!

Above all, Zionism is a crime against humanity. Dedicated to the oath of the survivors of Mauthausen concentration camp, handed down to us as testimony of resistance against Nazi fascism, we follow their universal legacy and reiterate their message: “The permanence in the camp, lasting years, has reinforced in our minds the knowledge of the value of brotherhood among the people of all nations. True to these ideals, we make a solemn oath to continue to fight, firm and united, against imperialism and against the instigation of hatred between peoples.”

Together we will join forces at the first Jewish Anti-Zionist Congress and united we will join the Palestinians in liberating Palestine, and building a democratic, just and equal society for all!

People of all backgrounds are invited.^[[1] https://www.juedisch-antizionistisch.at/en]

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31292062

Some Timestamps and Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

#theovonlatest #sabbysabs #iranwarnsusbases #tylerperrynews #joshhawleybill #populisttalkshowhosts


Some Timestamps:

  1. 0:00.000 - 2:58.000 Intermission
  2. 3:25.500 - 5:11.500 Thumbnail Segment Overview
  3. 5:11.500 - 48:45.500 Interview: Steve Grumbine, GOP Wage Increase
  4. 48:45.500 - 1:39:23.000 Israel Attacks Iran
  5. 1:39:23.000 - 1:54:54.000 Air India Boeing 787 bound for London crashes
  6. 1:54:54.000 - 1:59:38.500 Ananda Lewis Dies at 52, MTV VJ and Talk Show Host
  7. 1:59:38.500 - 2:14:49.000 Positive Story: Oregon Huge Win
  8. 2:14:49.000 - 2:36:39.500 Tyler Perry Backlash
  9. 2:36:39.500 - 3:02:58.000 Theo Von Checks JD Vance
  10. 3:02:58.000 - 3:04:27.500 Iranian state media confirms killing of Revolutionary Guards chief in Israeli strike
  11. 3:04:27.500 - 3:15:52.500 Sabby short break, EricT Red, Viewer Comments, Eleven Demands, Callin (Zoom Hangout)
  12. 3:15:52.500 - 3:16:32.001 Endcards/Credits

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The video covers a range of current events and political discussions, with a focus on MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) and its implications for understanding government spending and taxation.

Key Points:

  • Israel-Iran Tensions: The video acknowledges the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, including potential strikes.
  • Tyler Perry Backlash: Discusses the controversy surrounding Tyler Perry's new movie and its reception within the Black community.
  • GOP Wage Increase: Examines Senator Josh Harley's proposal for a $15 minimum wage increase and its potential impact.
  • Oregon Healthcare Vote: Highlights Oregon's decision to block private equity in healthcare.
  • Boeing Plane Crash: Mentions a breaking news story about a Boeing plane crash in India.
  • MMT Explanation: Steve Grumbine explains MMT, emphasizing that government spending creates money and taxes delete money. Taxes exist to maintain the value of the dollar.
  • Taxes Don't Fund Spending: Grumbine argues that taxes don't directly fund specific programs; the government creates new money for spending.
  • Debt and Deficit: MMT suggests that the national debt isn't necessarily a burden in the way it's commonly perceived.
  • Minimum Wage and Austerity: Raising the minimum wage without additional government spending could lead to austerity and job losses.
  • Federal Reserve: Discusses the Federal Reserve's role and whether its structure (private vs. public) ultimately matters.
  • 11 Demands: Explores the idea of building a movement around a core set of demands for social and economic change.

Highlights:

  • Steve Grumbine's explanation of MMT and the debunking of common misconceptions about taxes and government spending.
  • The call to stop saying "our tax dollars are funding this" because it's based on a misunderstanding of how the monetary system works.
  • The discussion about the potential negative consequences of raising the minimum wage without addressing broader economic issues and government spending policies.
  • The emphasis on building parallel systems and dual power structures to challenge the existing system.

About Channel:

Leftist news commentary and interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

 

Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

President Trump is making it clear that the U.S. is fully involved in the unprecedented attacked carried out by Israel, which included strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and ballistic missile factories, and the assassinations of multiple top Iranian military commanders.

Brian Berletic, a geopolitical analyst and Host of The New Atlas, noted that this is part of the U.S. war on the pillars of multi-polarity, and it is using Israel as a proxy to target Iran because of both its power in the Middle East and its proximity to Russia and China.


Generated Summary:

Main Topic:

The video discusses the recent attacks on Iran, allegedly carried out by Israel with the full support and planning of the United States, and frames it as part of a larger strategy to dismantle the multi-polar world order and isolate Russia and China.

Key Points:

  • US Involvement: The speaker argues that the attacks are not solely an Israeli operation but a US-backed initiative spanning multiple administrations (Obama, Trump, and Biden).
  • Long-Term Strategy: The attacks are presented as the culmination of a long-term US strategy, dating back to the Arab Spring, aimed at weakening Iran and its allies.
  • Policy Paper Implementation: The speaker emphasizes that the US is following a publicly available policy paper that outlines the steps leading to this conflict, including using diplomacy as a cover for future aggression.
  • Multipolarism Target: The speaker asserts that the attacks are not just about Iran but about eliminating a key pillar of the emerging multipolar world to further isolate Russia and China.
  • Strategic Sequencing: The US is employing a strategy of "strategic sequencing," dealing with adversaries one by one (Iran, then Russia, then China) to avoid simultaneous conflicts.
  • Iran's Position: Iran's options were limited, and any aggressive response would have been used as further justification for escalation by the US and Israel.
  • Russia and China's Response: The video expresses concern about the limited ability or willingness of Russia and China to effectively counter US actions, potentially emboldening further aggression.
  • US Primacy: The US is determined to maintain its global primacy and will resort to extreme measures, potentially including destabilizing entire regions, to achieve this goal.

Highlights:

  • Brian Berletic claims the US attack on Iran through Israel was years in the making and part of a publicly available policy.
  • The speaker warns that the US is using the same tactics of fake negotiations and strategic sequencing against Russia and China.
  • The video emphasizes the limited options available to Iran and the potential for further escalation by the US and Israel.
  • The discussion highlights the failure of the international community to prevent the attacks and the implications for the future of the multipolar world.

About Channel:

Rachel Blevins is a journalist who is passionate about pursuing truth and questioning establishment narratives.

Rachel is based in Texas, and has worked as a News Presenter in Washington, DC, and Moscow, Russia.

Inspired by exploring the stories and angles of news that mainstream media refuse to cover, Rachel is devoted to reporting on topics such as government corruption, foreign policy, censorship and media hypocrisy.

https://www.minds.com/rachelblevins/

 

Generated Summary below:

This YouTube video features an interview with Dmitry Orlov, discussing current geopolitical events, primarily focusing on the Middle East (specifically the Israeli attack on Iran) and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Main Topics:

  • Middle East Conflict (Israel & Iran): Analysis of the recent Israeli attacks on Iran, the US's (Trump's) perceived role, and the implications for regional stability.
  • Ukraine Conflict: Discussion of the state of negotiations, Russia's strategy, the role of NATO, and the potential for further escalation.

Key Points & Highlights:

  • Israeli Attack on Iran: Orlov dismisses the attack as political assassination and a "nothing war" driven by Netanyahu's need for a perceived victory. He questions Iran's apparent incompetence in defending against the attacks.
  • Trump's Role: Orlov believes Trump is incapable of negotiating deals and his pronouncements are largely irrelevant.
  • Russia's Perspective on the Middle East: Russia is concerned about Israel providing Patriot batteries to Ukraine and the anti-Russian stance of the Israeli ambassador in Ukraine. Russia will not fight Iran's fight if Iran refuses to defend itself.
  • Ukraine Negotiations: Orlov states that current discussions are merely technical and not genuine peace negotiations. He highlights the disparity in casualties between Ukrainian and Russian forces.
  • Russia's Strategy in Ukraine: Russia aims to create a buffer zone to protect its territory (including annexed regions) from Ukrainian attacks. The ultimate goal is unconditional capitulation by the Ukrainian regime and a stand-down by NATO.
  • AI in Ukraine Conflict: Orlov is skeptical about claims of Ukraine using AI in drone attacks, suggesting it's likely overblown. He highlights Russia's development of laser-based anti-drone technology.
  • NATO's Future: Orlov suggests that NATO may disband after the war in Ukraine is lost by the West, as it will no longer serve a useful function. He also claims the US is primarily interested in extracting money from European members.
  • China and Taiwan: Orlov suggests a possible deal where the US concedes Taiwan in exchange for China continuing to supply rare earth metals.
  • Syria and Regional Stability: Orlov believes Syria will disintegrate and be influenced by Turkey and Israel. He dismisses the idea of Russia, China, and Iran jointly deciding the future of the region.
  • Terrorist Attacks: Orlov states that Russia is actively thwarting terrorist attacks and aims to minimize their success. He believes that NATO will not transform itself into a terrorist organization.
  • Supporting Dmitry Orlov: Viewers can support his work by visiting [booy.to/cluborlov | Archived Link: https://archive.ph/CsPji] for articles in English and French.

About Channel:

Dedicated to dialogue and peace!

At Dialogue works, we believe there’s nothing more unstoppable than when people come together.

This group’s mission is to create a global community of diverse individuals who will support, challenge, and inspire one another by providing a platform for Dialogue.

We encourage you to share your knowledge, ask questions, participate in discussions, and become an integral part of this little community. Together we can become a better community and provide our members with a much better experience.

 

Generated Summary Below:


Video Description:

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs : War For War’s Sake.


Generated Summary:

Main Topic: Professor Jeffrey Sachs discusses the escalating tensions between the US, Israel, and Iran, arguing that recent events signal a dangerous shift towards open warfare and the collapse of diplomacy.

Key Points:

  • Escalation of Conflict: Sachs expresses dismay at the apparent joint US-Israeli action against Iran, which occurred despite ongoing negotiations regarding nuclear issues. He views this as a move towards outright war, replacing diplomacy with force.
  • Trump's Stance: Sachs interprets Trump's statements as an aggressive threat towards Iran, essentially stating that the US will kill Iranians unless they agree to US terms. He sees this as a form of fascism.
  • CIA/Mossad Operations: Sachs suggests that the recent attacks are part of a larger CIA/Mossad operation, extending conflict across the Middle East.
  • US Government Deception: Sachs criticizes the US Secretary of State and other government officials for denying US involvement in the attacks, highlighting the administration's dishonesty. He points out the contradiction between official statements and Trump's own words on Truth Social.
  • Neocon Influence: Sachs believes that neoconservatives have triumphed in shaping US foreign policy, leading to a long-term strategy of destabilizing the Middle East. He argues that this strategy, dating back to the 1990s, involves targeting specific countries, including Iran.
  • Netanyahu's Statements: Sachs finds Netanyahu's statements about Iran's plans to destroy Israel to be outrageous and hypocritical, suggesting that Netanyahu's own regime exhibits the same negative attributes he ascribes to the Iranians.
  • Lack of Trustworthiness: Sachs argues that the concept of trust in international diplomacy has been abandoned, replaced by a focus on power and lethality.

Highlights:

  • Sachs describes the current situation as reminiscent of the lead-up to World War II.
  • He accuses the US government of being a "war machine" run by unaccountable and deceptive intelligence agencies.
  • He expresses despair at the state of international relations, where negotiations are seemingly used as a cover for aggression.
  • He criticizes the "ultra Zionist" alliance driving the destabilization of the Middle East.
  • He highlights the danger of Israel's actions leading to widespread hatred and devastating consequences for the country itself.

About Channel:

Hard-hitting legal/political news from a man who knows and respects the Constitution and the importance of defending individual freedoms. Judge Andrew P. Napolitano.

A daily discussion of news from the perspective that government is the negation of liberty, and the individual is greater than the state. Judge Andrew P. Napolitano is a graduate of Princeton University and the University of Notre Dame Law School. He is the youngest life-tenured Superior Court judge in the history of the State of New Jersey. He sat on the bench from 1987 to 1995, when he presided over more than 150 jury trials and thousands of motions, sentencings, and hearings.

JudgeNap is nationally known for watching and reporting on the government as it takes liberty and property.

The Judge is the author of nine books on the U.S. Constitution, two of which have been New York Times Best Sellers. Learn more at JudgeNap.com

 

Generated Summary below:

Main Topic: The video discusses the recent Israeli attack on Iran, the potential consequences, and the broader geopolitical implications, particularly the roles of the US, Russia, and European countries.

Key Points:

  • Israeli Attack: Israel launched a significant attack on Iran, targeting military sites and potentially nuclear facilities. The attack was a surprise, with Iran expecting strikes on different targets.
  • US Involvement: The US is accused of being actively involved in planning and facilitating the Israeli attack, despite Trump's claims of pursuing diplomacy.
  • Iranian Response: Iran is expected to respond severely to the attack. The nature and timing of the response are uncertain, but it's likely to target Israel.
  • Escalation Risk: The attack significantly increases the risk of escalation, potentially leading to a wider regional conflict involving the US and other countries.
  • US-Iran Relations: Any possibility of negotiation with the US is now seen as impossible.
  • Regime Change: The attack is viewed by some in the West as a regime change operation, reflecting a long-held belief that a small push can topple the Iranian government.
  • Global Economic Impact: A wider conflict in the Persian Gulf could disrupt oil and gas supplies, leading to a global economic catastrophe.
  • Western Media Bias: The Western media is accused of spreading misinformation and disinformation to demonize Iran and justify Israeli actions.
  • US Support for Israel: The US, particularly under Trump, is strongly supportive of Israel, even to the point of risking wider conflict and global economic instability.
  • Iran's Capabilities: Iran possesses significant military capabilities, including missiles and drones, that can reach Israel and other countries in the region.
  • UN Ineffectiveness: The UN is portrayed as a feckless institution, unable to hold Israel accountable for its actions.

Highlights:

  • Larry Johnson compares the Israeli attack to Pearl Harbor, calling it an overt act of war.
  • Mohammed Marandi emphasizes that Iran is largely alone in the face of Western support for Israel.
  • Both speakers agree that the attack makes any future negotiations between Iran and the US impossible.
  • The discussion highlights the potential for a major global conflict with devastating consequences.
  • The speakers discuss the role of AI-generated disinformation in shaping public perception of the conflict.

About Channel:

Dedicated to dialogue and peace!

At Dialogue works, we believe there’s nothing more unstoppable than when people come together.

This group’s mission is to create a global community of diverse individuals who will support, challenge, and inspire one another by providing a platform for Dialogue.

We encourage you to share your knowledge, ask questions, participate in discussions, and become an integral part of this little community. Together we can become a better community and provide our members with a much better experience.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way around. Russia was violating international law doing this, invading a peaceful neighbor without provocation, and has since committed numerous war-crimes.

This is the Western regime’s decades-long geopolitical ambitions in the making.

Years versus decades, it is important to know the history and the causes of escalation.

If you would like to learn about non-Western propaganda, check out Professor Jeffrey Sachs. There are also independent journalists that I have shared that lay out the politics and geopolitical events that lead us to this conflict.

In a similar aspect, if you check out the history of Israel-Iran, US-China, and other countries in the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa, you will learn they share a common backing regime and geopolitical goal: the US.

You are not just wrong, your post simply reeks that you are brainwashed by Russian propaganda. And I mean seriously brainwashed, because your arguments are decidedly against the facts to a degree you are not even making sense.

It is no surprise anything critical or contradictory to the Western propaganda narrative gets labeled the boogeyman (bots, trolls, puppets, shills, etc.), similar to the China and Iran escalations.

If you are serious about learning much more, we must always be critical of our own governments' propaganda and be willing, not scared, to learn what is being said of dissenting views and sources.

Thanks for being willing to reply and have a small chat, even if we don't agree on the history and true intentions of the escalations.

“I’m as healthy as a horse, you dumb sumbitch!”

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Palestine is a genocide; they have no army and are in an imprisonment surrounded and controlled by Israel and Western forces fully supporting it.

Ukraine has an army with Western/NATO backing and CIA and MI6 intelligence as well, similar to Israel.

This is the Western regime's decades-long geopolitical ambitions in the making.

We are now at war with Iran and heading to war with China as well.

More forever wars where securing important resources is the main goal in exchange for the working classes' mass murder and death.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Quick thoughts:

When Democrat pedophiles are outed, they’ve been kicked out; Republican ones just get overlooked by their party and re-elected.

I don't think it is out of some sort of greater good. On the blue team, I see it as them being cowards and not willing to risk the scandal, letting those that get separated or kicked out from the herd get eaten.

The red team is similar in that aspect; if they stray and cause a scandal, they will let them be eaten by wolves unless they have backing, then they may be forced to help out to keep on good terms.

The major difference is when the politician has populist backing. We can see this with some politicians when their base goes full force in going against the party line and sticking with their politician.

Trump and his backing accomplished this feat. The Republicans were against him, but he had his MAGA backing to keep him from being eaten and taken out by the party; they did try, though. Not to mention he is also an oligarch with backing, so in some aspects it may be corporatists versus oligarchs.

Kamala was a corporatist, and Trump was an oligarch.

Voting the lesser of two evils quotes:

  1. "There's a terrible danger in voting for the lesser of two evils because the parties can set it up that way." -- Hunter S. Thompson
  2. "The two-party system is a bad joke on the American people; when it comes to Republicans and Democrats, remember they are two sides of the same coin. Voting for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil and not an answer to our problems. A vote for a Republican or a Democrat will not fix anything and is a wasted vote." -- Aaron Russo
  3. "Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil." -- Jerry Garcia.
  4. "Voting for the lesser of two evils is voting for your own enslavement." -- Gerald Celente
  5. "Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." -- John Quincy Adams
  6. "If you always vote for the lesser of two evils, you will always have evil, and you will always have less." -- Ralph Nader

but when we have a dictator in the White House, the political divide factor can’t be ignored either.

The only difference is that Trump is open with his dictator ways, but do not mistake that the duopoly will always work to help themselves and to let the working class die off.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31288606

Generated Summary below:

Main Topic: Israel's military strike against Iran, its motivations, and potential consequences.

Key Points:

  • Israeli Announcement: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared the launch of "Operation Rising Lion," a military operation targeting Iran to eliminate what he claims is a nuclear threat.
  • Targets: Israel reportedly struck nuclear scientists, military leaders, and nuclear facilities, including the Natanz enrichment facility.
  • Iranian Confirmation: Iranian state TV confirmed the killing of high-ranking IRGC commanders and nuclear scientists.
  • US Involvement: Marco Rubio stated that Israel informed the US of the planned attack, but the US was not directly involved. The US urged Iran not to retaliate against US interests.
  • Motivations:
    • Israel claims it's preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
    • The speaker suggests Israel might prefer a weakened, sanctioned Iran with the potential for nuclear weapons over a reintegrated Iran that agrees to inspections and foregoes its nuclear program.
    • Israel may be trying to provoke a larger conflict that draws the US into direct conflict with Iran.
  • Potential Iranian Responses:
    • Symbolic, limited retaliation.
    • Withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
    • A major ballistic missile campaign.
  • US Strategic Position: The speaker argues that the US may not have the bandwidth or desire for another long-term conflict in the Middle East.
  • Netanyahu's Political Maneuvering: Netanyahu recently won a vote in the Knesset, securing his position for at least six months, which may be related to the timing of the strike.

Highlights:

  • Contradictory Intelligence: US intelligence assessments reportedly contradict Netanyahu's claim of an immediate Iranian nuclear threat.
  • Israel's Undeclared Nuclear Arsenal: The speaker points out the hypocrisy of Israel, which possesses undeclared nuclear weapons and is not a party to the NPT, demanding Iran not have a nuclear program.
  • Potential for Escalation: The strike significantly raises the risk of a wider conflict in the Middle East, potentially involving the US.
  • Conflicting Narratives: Israel is publicly undermining the US narrative that it was not involved in the strike.
  • Israel's Long-Term Strategy: Israel's long-term strategic position is not very comfortable or very positive because America doesn't have the bandwidth to fight in the Middle East for another 30 years.

Interesting take.

Thanks for taking the time to explain your thought process and how you arrived at certain conclusions!

 

Some Timestamps and Generated Summary below:


Video Description:

#theovonlatest #sabbysabs #iranwarnsusbases #tylerperrynews #joshhawleybill #populisttalkshowhosts


Some Timestamps:

  1. 0:00.000 - 2:58.000 Intermission
  2. 3:25.500 - 5:11.500 Thumbnail Segment Overview
  3. 5:11.500 - 48:45.500 Interview: Steve Grumbine, GOP Wage Increase
  4. 48:45.500 - 1:39:23.000 Israel Attacks Iran
  5. 1:39:23.000 - 1:54:54.000 Air India Boeing 787 bound for London crashes
  6. 1:54:54.000 - 1:59:38.500 Ananda Lewis Dies at 52, MTV VJ and Talk Show Host
  7. 1:59:38.500 - 2:14:49.000 Positive Story: Oregon Huge Win
  8. 2:14:49.000 - 2:36:39.500 Tyler Perry Backlash
  9. 2:36:39.500 - 3:02:58.000 Theo Von Checks JD Vance
  10. 3:02:58.000 - 3:04:27.500 Iranian state media confirms killing of Revolutionary Guards chief in Israeli strike
  11. 3:04:27.500 - 3:15:52.500 Sabby short break, EricT Red, Viewer Comments, Eleven Demands, Callin (Zoom Hangout)
  12. 3:15:52.500 - 3:16:32.001 Endcards/Credits

Generated Summary:

Main Topic: The video covers a range of current events and political discussions, with a focus on MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) and its implications for understanding government spending and taxation.

Key Points:

  • Israel-Iran Tensions: The video acknowledges the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, including potential strikes.
  • Tyler Perry Backlash: Discusses the controversy surrounding Tyler Perry's new movie and its reception within the Black community.
  • GOP Wage Increase: Examines Senator Josh Harley's proposal for a $15 minimum wage increase and its potential impact.
  • Oregon Healthcare Vote: Highlights Oregon's decision to block private equity in healthcare.
  • Boeing Plane Crash: Mentions a breaking news story about a Boeing plane crash in India.
  • MMT Explanation: Steve Grumbine explains MMT, emphasizing that government spending creates money and taxes delete money. Taxes exist to maintain the value of the dollar.
  • Taxes Don't Fund Spending: Grumbine argues that taxes don't directly fund specific programs; the government creates new money for spending.
  • Debt and Deficit: MMT suggests that the national debt isn't necessarily a burden in the way it's commonly perceived.
  • Minimum Wage and Austerity: Raising the minimum wage without additional government spending could lead to austerity and job losses.
  • Federal Reserve: Discusses the Federal Reserve's role and whether its structure (private vs. public) ultimately matters.
  • 11 Demands: Explores the idea of building a movement around a core set of demands for social and economic change.

Highlights:

  • Steve Grumbine's explanation of MMT and the debunking of common misconceptions about taxes and government spending.
  • The call to stop saying "our tax dollars are funding this" because it's based on a misunderstanding of how the monetary system works.
  • The discussion about the potential negative consequences of raising the minimum wage without addressing broader economic issues and government spending policies.
  • The emphasis on building parallel systems and dual power structures to challenge the existing system.

About Channel:

Leftist news commentary and interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

 

Generated Summary below:

Main Topic: Israel's military strike against Iran, its motivations, and potential consequences.

Key Points:

  • Israeli Announcement: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared the launch of "Operation Rising Lion," a military operation targeting Iran to eliminate what he claims is a nuclear threat.
  • Targets: Israel reportedly struck nuclear scientists, military leaders, and nuclear facilities, including the Natanz enrichment facility.
  • Iranian Confirmation: Iranian state TV confirmed the killing of high-ranking IRGC commanders and nuclear scientists.
  • US Involvement: Marco Rubio stated that Israel informed the US of the planned attack, but the US was not directly involved. The US urged Iran not to retaliate against US interests.
  • Motivations:
    • Israel claims it's preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons.
    • The speaker suggests Israel might prefer a weakened, sanctioned Iran with the potential for nuclear weapons over a reintegrated Iran that agrees to inspections and foregoes its nuclear program.
    • Israel may be trying to provoke a larger conflict that draws the US into direct conflict with Iran.
  • Potential Iranian Responses:
    • Symbolic, limited retaliation.
    • Withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
    • A major ballistic missile campaign.
  • US Strategic Position: The speaker argues that the US may not have the bandwidth or desire for another long-term conflict in the Middle East.
  • Netanyahu's Political Maneuvering: Netanyahu recently won a vote in the Knesset, securing his position for at least six months, which may be related to the timing of the strike.

Highlights:

  • Contradictory Intelligence: US intelligence assessments reportedly contradict Netanyahu's claim of an immediate Iranian nuclear threat.
  • Israel's Undeclared Nuclear Arsenal: The speaker points out the hypocrisy of Israel, which possesses undeclared nuclear weapons and is not a party to the NPT, demanding Iran not have a nuclear program.
  • Potential for Escalation: The strike significantly raises the risk of a wider conflict in the Middle East, potentially involving the US.
  • Conflicting Narratives: Israel is publicly undermining the US narrative that it was not involved in the strike.
  • Israel's Long-Term Strategy: Israel's long-term strategic position is not very comfortable or very positive because America doesn't have the bandwidth to fight in the Middle East for another 30 years.
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Correct, the meme explains why:

DEMOCRATS DO NOT EXIST TO STOP REPUBLICANS. THEY EXIST TO STOP LEFTIST MOVEMENTS FROM GAINING POWER OR POLITICAL ACCESS FOR CHANGE.

It seems like you now understand the meme a bit more.

Awesome!

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

liberals are not blind followers willing to overlook any sin

It seems you confused liberals with leftists.

Liberals are the vote blue no matter who peeps.

Putting aside the divide-and-conquer strategies of political leanings, I think we should focus on uniting the working class on the economic issues we agree on rather than waste our time debating what we don't agree on.

Chris Smalls achieved uniting the working class in an Amazon warehouse in Staten Island when the Amazon Labor Union (ALU) was formed.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Who has helped pass more Republican bills, leftists or Democrats?

We all get emotional on certain topics; it is understandable.

All is well, peace.

Check out Highlights section.

Only five points.

view more: next ›