fartripper

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

couldn’t handle this one. it just wore me down.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

“We hypothesize that increased costs may, coincidentally, bring increased prices.”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i’m devastated this isn’t playable

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The mom has six fingers too. I think this is more likely a genetic abnormality rather than AI because of that inner consistency and it’s probably pretty distasteful of everyone here to be judging and trashing the family’s special moment based on ok I’m completely fucking kidding.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is overall distribution by percentage, so aggregate total represented wouldn’t have an impact. If it were to have an impact, I think we’d have hoped it would mean the slope was more even.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

If I could edit someone else’s post this should already say “six foot mating requirement“

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

i hate to bring this up, but we also need a separate function for negative numbers

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

or divide the number by two and if the remainder is greater than

-(4^34)

but less than

70 - (((23*3*4)/2)/2)

then

true
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)
view more: next ›