Vampire

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Not because there is ethical consumption under capitalism, but because ethical purity is the wrong goal.

Leftists keep getting distracted by moralising. The aim is to lift the working class.

'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism' is a catchcry used to argue against consumer action because it is morally impure. I don't care whether my actions are morally pure; I care about the results they produce.

Leftists are shit at focusing on the results of their action. The end-game of leftists is to feel morally superior: never mind that no good results have been achieved.

Using syllogistic logic:

  • Surface premise: 'There is no ethical consumption under capitalism'

  • Hidden premise: And we should only take actions that are ethically pure

  • Conclusion: therefore we shouldn't reform consumption

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 4 points 18 hours ago

Honestly any/all Yanquí pop culture can be assumed to carry hegemonic brainwashing

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've had dinner with gangsters and murderers.

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

There's better criticisms of Pinker.

I don't like guilt by association.

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I've been avoiding most internet because I have no temptation to hear the opinions of idiots.

Two people who aren't Ukrainian, don't speak Ukrainian, have never read a book about Ukraine trying to make their opinion on Ukraine win an argument? No thanks, not my choice of pastime.

Maybe I'm part of a trend? People have seen through the slapfights and are ready for something else?

I want to learn from experts, not tabloid comment-sections. e.g. this is good content - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dhn3ssSH4nY - look at her CV, she has a right to speak.

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably Cybernetics by Wiener is the basic text?

 

What should I read to understand how to build and verify a cybernetically valid system? (e.g. cybernetically valid planned economy)

I understand that production needs to be controlled, and that the decision-making needs to be linked to the front-line workers (because they have eyeballs on the reality of the work). And it's a design-error if decisions are made removed from work, because the controller doesn't have first-hand knowledge.

But I don't understand how to describe that in formal terms. Is there a list of all possible system-design-errors? Is there a methodology/checklist for confirming if me mum is cybernetically valid?

Is there a textbook on all this?

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The hole in this theory is that the lyrics are very clearly about taking a flight back there.

 

Curious.

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Talk to people, make eye contact, etc.

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Don't watch tv while eating ffs

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I know that it’s a myth that Chinese products are shit quality

There's lots of shit-quality Chinese products mate

 

 

property

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Your obsession with the USA is a bit embarrassing

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

delendi sunt*

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

Internet says: "A standard cord of well-seasoned hardwood (stack of wood 4'X 4'X 8' or 128 cubic feet) contains the heat equivalent of about 20 million BTU's. By way of comparison this is more or less equivalent to the heat value in 145 gallons (3.38 barrels) of #2 fuel oil or 215 gallons of LP gas (5.119 barrels)."

As a rule of thumb, you can sustainably harvest one half to one full cord (128 cubic feet or 4'x4'x8′) of firewood per acre per year.

1 short ton (2,000 pounds) of coal (consumed by the electric power sector) = 18,820,000 Btu. Therefore, an acre of forest is like a tonne of coal a year.

Great Britain used 75 to 275 million tonnes of coal per year 1860-1980 (More precise figures in a spreadsheet here tell the same story: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/historical-coal-data-coal-production-availability-and-consumption)

Great Britain is 60 million acres, so even at 100% forestation it wouldn't equal coal, but could contribute.

view more: next ›