TrojanRoomCoffeePot

I've been saying it for years, but get no traction unless I'm preaching to the choir - these health data tracking programs are not your friend, and your MD shouldn't need them to competently render medical services to you. I'm staring to feel like Cassandra of Troy the way that I'm predicting trends and inevitable outcomes to people who don't give a shit about their own personal safety.

The data is not secure, and the systems which purport to protect them are so lackluster that they bear comparison to guarding piles of meat from wet dogs with a paper fence. This information will reveal compromising details about your personal life which are a blackmailer's wet dream, to say nothing of data aggregators, and the possible application by something so commonplace as insurance companies to approve/deny coverage.

Worse yet, in this case, is the application by "bad actors" beyond the government(s) where legality of sexual healthcare is in flux (see: gender affirming care, abortion, homosexuality, etc.). It bears considering that rapists with access to said information could use it not only to track their victim's location, and other particulars, but to help them avoid/succeed in impregnating the victim in question. This shit needs to go, it's a five alarm blaze with no smoke.

They've named a 50501 volunteer, but not any specific one so far as I've seen.

Sure it, doesn't, neither does the weather but it still tends to function based reliably predictable criteria. I'm describing the baseline definition because OP asked about whether or not it counts. Judges decide, and generally err based on constituent parts of the scenario qualify for established legal definitions.

You know what, that's fair. the COC gets a bit loosey-goosey with the volunteer gigs.

@Rodneyck Do you have a stock version without the text still? Asking for a friend who may want to make mean memes about Donnie.

By legal standards, it's my understanding that any unlawful release from custody is a "jail break" regardless of the conditions of incarceration. Unjust detainment is a kind of legal threshold intended to assign a determination of legality to any scenario where anyone is taken into custody by state officials or law enforcement, not someone's opinion of whether or not it's fair.

"and to our non-negotiable prohibition of firearms policy for anyone representing 50501 at any of our actions or events... it is clear we do not have a complete understanding of what happened yet. what is certain is that, if no guns were present at the protest, this tragedy would have been prevented altogether." -50-50-1

So which is it, a complete absence of firearms at their events, or do their Peacekeeper volunteers have firearms and conceal carry permits?

Press liability most likely. They don't want to fuck it up and have people accidentally haranguing the wrong person before they confirm facts & misinformation.

Holy shit, this meme is so old that I have a copy saved on an old office PC I haven't used in like two decades... Save goes for Mandarin Sultan posted by u/saltnotsugar

Best of luck to you, it sounds like you're moving past it pretty well compared to some others I've heard about or know.

Low, low, low. It's limbo low, right on the ground with the dirt.

Getting real “I told him I wanted a sensitive guy but then he cried and I got the ick” vibes on this one.

Spot on, I've learned the hard way to never trust someone who harangues me about my feelings. If they're too tactless to make the offer and leave the ball in your court, they can't be trusted with what you confide in them to begin with. Willingly feeding sensitive information about your feelings is a risky game, it's important to know whether or not they're just aping at stock phrases about emotional health beforehand, or actually someone who can be relied upon to give objective support.