Going nuclear is such a huge risk though. It's a threshold that can't be taken back.
Israel could use a nuke to call a timeout, only for a nuke to go off in Tel Aviv in a few years in revenge and permanently end the settler project.
Staines
joined 4 years ago
Saudi and Jordan are the first line of Israeli defence, and I hope Iran has enough missiles to subdue them.
The lost chapo presenter.
Ukrainian brains have apparently been absolutely cooked after marinating in the fascism sauce for too long.
I'm glad the Russians are once again tackling an expansionist nazi power on Europes behalf. Yet again, we won't thank them for it.
Is that the massacre where allegedly some tanks shot and ran over thousands of people in a city square, but then stopped and had a chat with a guy on the way out of the site of the massacre? Just to confirm I'm not misunderstanding, are you denying that doesn't seem odd to you?
Nuremburg was a half measure. No more half measures.
At the same time, if Russia genuinely thinks they're under existential threat from part of their nuclear triad being kicked out from under them by the proxy agents of an enemy nuclear power...
I hope such a massive blow to Russia's nuclear strategic assets doesn't result in a nuclear strategic response.
China is an authoritarian state, they mandate that the 50% least loyal population are uygulag'd at all times.
Vladimir Putin, has been the most stable and consistent western liberal leader. He clearly states his aims, stays the course, and has kept the current conflict relatively constrained. Meanwhile, anglosphere leaders are constantly twisting, turning, and seemingly trying to create instability on purpose. European leaders, it seems, have one element of consistency: they can always be counted on to do the wrong thing.
I don't even like Putin.
Tel Aviv delenda est.