Neither are more gay men and straight women.
JakenVeina
Is the BlueSky OP here not a native English speaker? Cause, BOY that was tough to follow.
Yet, it seems to me that your argument is, ‘We get to keep on doing it until everyone who is potentially harmed by it figures out how to file a lawsuit and hire a lawyer.’
Nailed it. Because they know full-well that most people DON'T have the capacity to file a lawsuit and hire a lawyer. They are ignoring laws because they know no one will make them stop.
Can't wait to see the court vote 6-3 the other way.
The Steam release of Persona 5 Royal, unfortunately. Which is kind of insane, it's a single-player game.
There's some others that I can't personally attest to, but that sure look good from what I've seen. Monster Hunter: Wilds, for example. And the new Doom from a few days ago, if you're into that sorta thing. Metaphor Re-Fantasio. The new Prince of Persia from last year. Hi-Fi Rush. Rocksmith, of all things.
As of a few months ago (IIRC the timeline) Steam shows this directly on the game's store page. You've got to scroll down for it a little bit, but it's right under where it lists features of the game, E.G. single-player, controller support, etc.
Yes. You're right, Hillary. Now, go away.
On one hand, turnabout is always a good time. Maybe it'll clue some folks in to how bullshit that decision was, from the start.
On the other hand, lol, no it fucking won't. They'll just make up some other new bullshit reason that "no, that doesn't actually apply, in this one specific case, where the person we want to prosecute doesn't agree with us".
That's a good analogy.
It's far more often stored in a word, so 32-64 bytes, depending on the target architecture. At least in most languages.
I'd say it depends on WHY you like the art. Does it tie into the toxic or reprehensible traits of the artist? Was the artist trying to send a toxic or reprehensible message with this art?
If not, then it's just a matter of ensuring that your enjoyment of the art doesn't translate into support for the artist. Or, at least, that it doesn't cross your personal line of support for the artist.
So, for example, does the Kanye music you like have nazi themes or messaging? Far as I'm aware, no, the nazi-ism is just his newest shit, so you're probably fine as long as you're not streaming from Spotify or YouTube, or otherwise giving him revenue.
This isn't just a horrifically-misleading headline, it's straight-up false.
The bill originally was written to directly establish personhood of a fetus, but Democrats got an amendment in that keeps the "pregnant mothers get to use the carpool lane" part, without the language that establishes personhood for a fetus. They literally called the Republicans' bluff on "this bill is about supporting mothers", by making that specific. This caused one Republican to retract his vote, because the amendment "guts the pro-life purpose of the bill".
The hell does "elbows up" mean? The article doesn't say.