Dogyote

What government hasn't committed an atrocity?

Again, the article does not support your assertion. It seems you have been led on by the suggestion presented in the article. If you consider the statistics the author presented without that suggestion, you'll realize they're fairly unrelated data points that add up to... several interesting, but unrelated data points.

Furthermore, it's a nation wide data set, right? So how does that break down along state lines? For example, did enough people stay home in Michigan to affect the outcome of Michigan? We don't know based on the data presented in the article.

Now, would you like to discuss my critical thinking skills? If you have more data I'd be happy to consider it.

I don't see how your link supports your assertion.

Four parties would be quite interesting. I think we'd need to do away with the first past the post voting system and have ranked choice instead.

I want to push back on your second paragraph because I don't think it's quite right. Humans are literally the only species where individuals will cooperate with complete strangers. Pick 5 random people from across the planet, put them in a space together, and they'll cooperate.

I believe Santa Claus has already done this

Yeah, it might be too soon to tell. On one hand it's good to tell the corporate Dems they can't offer something slightly better than awful, but then empowering the people behind Trump seems so dangerous. People are being harmed, including new people who weren't being harmed before. Will it be worth it? Will it work out at all? Nobody is guiding this, we're just reacting. The right is supposed to be reacting, but they have the power.

If that's true then yes, I think you should stop

Right, not the best. Would you change your strategy?

Remember, no matter how beautiful, morally righteous, or gratifying your strategy is, you should really look at the results

How'd that work out?

This is contrary to everything else I've heard about drones, this can't be right.