CarbonScored

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Anti-Russian sentiment still has good stock prices at the moment, break out a few more front pages and 'balanced BBC coverage' calling him out as a Russian spy.. again.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even this is a bit too unkind - When he was being called a racist and anti-semite, he DID call them out on their BS, repeatedly, to anyone who'd listen. Thing is, the media never actually broadcast those responses - you had to dig deep to find them. He spoke to loads of people and did his best to confront the dumb shit, but it's pointless if it's not reported on. e.g. the EHCR report clearing Corbyn of any antisemitism, but no matter how 'confrontational' Corbyn was in pointing this out, the headlines just lied anyway.

You can't meaningfully call out BS accusations without a meaningful platform that will listen to you and effectively share your message.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Urban riots are a special form of violence. They are not insurrections. The rioters are not seeking to seize territory or to attain control of institutions. They are mainly intended to shock the white community. ... The looting which is their principal feature serves many functions. It enables the most enraged and deprived Negro to take hold of consumer goods with the ease the white man does by using his purse.

Let us say boldly that if the violations of law by the white man in the slums over the years were calculated and compared with the law-breaking of a few days of riots, the hardened criminal would be the white man.

I won't argue that Dr King was big on it. But he absolutely supported and understood violent protests. The very violent protests that preceded actual, if minor, concessions.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Two closely related points on this -

  • When your messaging is limited, I think there's a lot to be said for emphasising a position over a label. "SUPPORT COMMUNISM (plus let's make life better)" has a very different vibe to "LET'S MAKE LIFE BETTER (Communism can help)".

  • Secondly, relatedly, there's a compromise between 'hiding it' and 'blaring it without context'. If you just say "I'm a communist" and then leave, people will ascribe whatever they want to you and you've probably done your credibility a disservice in the public's eye. If you contextualise that with some relevant position or two, then it becomes a lot more obvious and helps normalise the term.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Lies, Long Corbyn obviously originates from Corbyn being really long. He's full of socialism, but the long legs are where he keeps his electoralism treats.

Cool to see though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I do think AI is good for what I'd term 'ideation', ask it for suggestions and it can bring up a lot of disparate and or related concepts in one space for you to think through and consider as options. Names would be an obvious example, so I dig it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Is he trying to argue in support of de facto Ukraine or the Eastern regions + DPR/LPR? This argument could so easily be used to justify supporting either side. Because they're both sides with long-standing languages, hatred of the other side's president, and mass foreign military support.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I think "100% assembled" is probably the more accurate term they mean. Not to downplay the importance of that, though - assembling components means you have colossally more control over where you import from, the tariffs you're subject to, and the countries you want to deal with. Aside from the obvious value increase in assembly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Oh so just because it's proven to significantly cause cancer at basically any amount it's somehow bad?! WOKE porky-scared-flipped

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Absolutely not a problem and no need to apologise, though I appreciate it.

Even as someone who posted and got over-invested in both struggle sessions, I think it's 100% funny you asked. Care-Comrade

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Well, maybe one of us is misremembering/misinterpreted, but I posted in both struggle sessions and I completely disagree with your representation of the sides.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is the most succinct definition and dismissal of the concept.

 
 

I don't know how meaningful the question really is, and fuck YouGov, but still thought the data were interesting and vaguely positive.

 

inshallah

Or

Frogshallah lives on as my headcanon

 

An absolute many are neo-fascist libs, but some, I assume, are good people. a-little-trolling

https://lemmy.world/post/18545268

I thought it was nice to see a couple good takes out in the wild for a change (an anti-dunk tank?). Not all of the comments are perfect, but many are fighting the libs on the posting lines. posting

@Rookwood

The reason capitalism leads to fascism is that inevitably capitalism will lead to untenable inequality. Injustice will be too great to ignore between the rich and the rest. This will lead to populism.

There are two forms of populism. One will seek to rectify the imbalances caused by capitalism. The other will seek to divert blame to minorities. If there were less . then our society would not be in decay. One is much more useful to the Capitalist and so it will ultimately prevail. The capitalist will devote all resources to crushing the leftist populism up to and including directly funding fascism.

160 upvotes • 12 downvotes

Dharma Curious

Some of the comments in this thread really tell you why it takes a novel laureate to say this. Some of y’all do not have a basic understanding of history, economic systems, or what the term reactionary actually means.

The correct response to “neo liberal capitalism has contributed to the rise of fascism” should be “no shit, Sherlock”

It’s truly sad that that isn’t 100% of the comments here.

Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleed, y’all. That doesn’t mean all liberals are fascist, that means that fascism is an outgrowth of liberalism.

And just in case y’all also don’t know what that means, “liberalism” in that context isn’t “Obama liberal, Bush conservative,” it means the political ideology of liberalism, of which both Bush and Obama were proponents of.

ETA: I’m not engaging anymore… it’s not my job to teach y’all the difference between an economic system and authoritarian states. Also, your magic has no power here, I am an anarchist, not a stalinist. Please educate yourselves. If for no other reason, do it to make it easier to pwn the tankies or whatever the fuck

101 upvotes • 19 downvotes

@[email protected]

i hate it when I hear people making the claim that it is capitalism that has helped so many people in the world with better quality of life and more opportunities and better outcomes, etc.

Capitalism is a fucking disease that we need to rid ourselves of, it is worse than Ebola the way it infects our minds with the dumbest shit.

You know what has made lives better for billions of people? The washing machine and the cotton gin and fucking electricity.

Capitalism has fought against progress every step of the way.

74 upvotes • 9 downvotes

@njm1314

Well of course it has, fascism is the end result of capitalism. Some would say it’s natural conclusion.

63 upvotes • 13 downvotes

BlackLaZoR

fascism is the end result of capitalism

I wonder what sort of echo chamber you must live in, in order to believe this

20 upvotes • 67 downvotes

 

This is just a short, easy-to-read paper I keep in my bookmarks and go back to occasionally. It explores, qualitatively, the various outcomes that contact with alien intelligence might have. I think it's a really cool 25-page exploration of possibilities that are fun to think about. Some choice quotes:

ETI (extraterrestrial intelligence) might attack us not out of selfishness but instead out of a universalist desire to make the galaxy a better place.

perhaps ETI make contact with Earth to welcome us into the Galactic Club but only after we complete a set of required bureaucratic tasks

hexbear-posadist

They may be interested in incorporating us into their civilization so they can sell us their products, keep us as pets, or have us mine raw materials for them.

if ETI place intrinsic value on lives, then perhaps they could bring about more lives by destroying us and using our resources more efficiently for other lives

My favourite section is the "unintentional harm" outcomes, which suggests the possibility that they just might squish us by accident.

One non-biological physical hazard that we could face from direct contact with ETI is unintentional mechanical harm. For example, ETI might accidentally crush us while attempting an unrelated maneuver.

i-spil-my-jice

Can't for the life of me find where I first heard of this, but I just wanted to share it for being fun and fairly silly yet still officially worked on by NASA.

 

Because it's bad. It's a bad place with honestly bad posts.

madeline-deadpan

That's all.

 

owl-pissed

Nah I obviously don't care, r/greenandpleasant are alright. I just thought it was funny to see my own words out there.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/feb/05/queue-new-nhs-dental-practice-bristol-st-pauls

"99% of dentists across the south-west aren’t accepting any new adult patients."

Getting anything but emergency healthcare in the UK is nigh impossible for much of the country now, I've been on the waiting lists of all my local dentists for over 18 months.

This'll get spread around as heavily as that misleading bread line photo from the USSR, right?

 

You mean mass, indiscriminate air strikes aren't a good way to save hostages and actually just result in dead people???

 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/52. Lemme kick it off with the still top rated post on hexbear.net, probably worth restating for our federation friends too.

edit: this post has gained a lot of traction over the course of the last three months so I believe some clarification is needed

this title is indeed a land of contrast, and i think the following statement should do a better job at voicing what I really meant with this post:

people who think they can own one or several human beings and treat them as their property or capital do indeed deserve to die, preferably sooner than later, and not of natural causes; helping accelerate this process by loading a rifle with ammunition, pointing it at a slave owner and pulling the trigger is a good idea and should be done when possible. hopefully this clarified the stuff

The post that announces the death of Henry Alfred Kissinger better overtake this one as the most upvoted post.

edit:edit:The killing slavers fandom is dying! Upbear to murder a plantation owner right now!

view more: next ›