this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
481 points (94.6% liked)

People Twitter

7692 readers
941 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a good joke

But half because the logic is so terrible. That's not passive income. It's retail

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Uses other people's money for both the product and service = "passive".

You're not thinking enough like a grifter to grasp the "big-picture" thinking at work here.

quotation marks = sacastic/fake in my usage, to be clear.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You’re not thinking enough like a grifter

I mean, its obviously a shit post. But I imagine spending a whole day doing fake interviews - 50 a day, five days a week, for a month - to make around $6k gross, and then tell yourself you can scale this up passively.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's why you never stop at just one hustle!

Enough scale, and why would you keep your day-job? ... but you don't have to be smart-enough for that to buy-into and sell this lifestyle!

Congrats on pin-pointing why I leave my own true potential for grift and hustle on the table, save for moments of desperation where inaction would otherwise cost my family. That is to say, I sometimes borrow money from my mom, and that's plenty evil enough for me.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 days ago (3 children)

50-60 a day? Assuming a 7.5 h workday, or 450 minutes, that's ~8 minutes per interview, pretty hard to keep up even for fake ones

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its also not passive if you're working for it lmao

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

Doing 50 conversations in a day is a lot of work.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Also on the high end, 30 people buy a drink, meeting 300$ profit? What are the sodas $20 each?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

$300 divided by 30 would be $10, but still, there's no fucking way anyone is going for that. The post is probably meant as satire, but they should have at least made it believable

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was building in for cost of renting the machine, stocking sodas what have you. lol. Even this empty headed catgirl can divide 300 by 10!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

empty headed catgirl can divide 300 by 10

You mean divide 300 by 30? 🫠

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Mmm yeah. That one. I can do some simple math, but unable to read :3

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

😁👍 We all have our days sometimes, eh.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah this math ain't mathin'.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

It's one soda, Michael. What could it cost? 20 dollars?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Gotta be group interviews. Had a few of them in my time. They're shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Even with group interviews... Let's take the supposed profit, 300$, and assume it's 100 pops at 3$ each, and for the sake of it let's say revenue = profit in this case. That's 100 purchases per day.

The post claims 50 interviewees per day, so 2 purchases per interviewees.

By groups of 10, that's 5 cohorts spending 1h each with the interviewer, during which every. Single. Person. Buys 2 drinks?

Humm!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's one drink, what could it cost? Ten dollars?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This feels like another one of those funny jokes that someone will come along and ruin by telling me he's serious.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This does not seem feasible and isn't passive income at all because he's actively doing stuff to make it happen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I could believe someone might call it "passive" in their head (they're not actively selling the thing, I suppose). Because having "passive income" seems to be a kind of status symbol for some people.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Only almost, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

The entire world is

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

That's some expensive drinks too.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean how is that even remotely passive?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's "passive" because it uses his employers' time and money to generate additional off-the-books income for himself.

Same way many land-lords mortgage their rental properties close-to insolvency. Damn straigh, "passive"=using other people's money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I doubt he's using company time if he does 50-60 interviews daily and doesn't hire anyone. No company would pay you to do that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Your faith in corporate HR departments astounds me.

OTOH, don't count out reviews, promotions, discipline and other "interviews". Also meetings, so many meetings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No faith in corporate HR, but concrete knowlege of how payroll works. No company is your friend, they are there to make as much money off of you as possible. Internal meetings are not external interviews, if you were hired to do a job interviewing for a positons and you went through 50-60 people a day with no results, they would replace you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Don't forget Ghost jobs and all the temp/recruitment agencies out there, but I did forget the "I never hire anyone" bit until your comment prompted me to check the pic again. Also, listings that only exist certain nepotism or racial/class hires, but they stild have to interview x number of excluded candidates for appearances' sake.

Personally, there were a few times I was head-hunted by what turned out to be middlemen trying to fill a quota. No in-person interviews, but to say the jobs they were recruiting for were a bad fit for my public credentials would be an understatement.

I assure you, corporate non-sense knows no bounds, and I'm happy for you, that you've had the luck to avoid encountering some of the worst and most demoralizing of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yep, also why the hell would they let him keep the vending machine money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Simple. Because they don't know its there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, he is restocking the machine himself?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Seems like it, but admitting to anything like the work of loading it or the expense of purchasing the drinks would tarnish his grifter persona.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s a Japanese vending machine design, and it’s half embedded into the jutting corner of that wall.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Frankly, I wouldn't want to work in an office whose floorplan is only measured in 3 dimensions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Photoshopping to avoid tipping-off his employer is the closest thing to a smart decision on display here. Worthless if he's not using a pseudonym.

Nice catch!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

9000$ a month won't do shit

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Branch out and rent one of those rooms for $100/day, hire an interviewer for $100/day. Rinse and repeat ad nauseam until Trillionaire.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

And how do you hire the interviewers? (see step 1)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

50-60 job interviews for a measly $300.

Sounds miserable. I’d rather flip burgers for McDonald’s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine making yourself miserable just to make $300

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean starting wages in fast food still like 15 an hour and it's a pretty miserable gig.

I'd rather do the interviews.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Hell, me from Slovakia makes 4.70 EUR per hour.

Though I don't know about the difference in local purchasing power.