this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
34 points (97.2% liked)

Canada

10122 readers
570 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Gee sure would be nice if that DST went thru for some extra revenue without cuts... 🤦‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Saving the economy will need more spending, even if some efficiencies in government is fine. Don't hear about anything about economic boosting other than dead ender energy pipelines.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Canada total spending is $450B

But $120B of that is discretionary excluding transfer payments.

So we're looking at a whole of government reduction of $18B for 15%. Transport Canada spends $25B on roads.

Stop subsidizing inefficient personal vehicles by making people absorb the real costs of them and we can make that cut in seconds.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree, but unfortunately that's basically never going to happen. At least not in our lifetimes.

One of Canada's greatest flaws is that we followed the US into car-dependent, suburban-sprawl at the catastrophic expense of everything else. We have spent decade upon decade investing unfathomable amounts of money into building the most dysfunctional cities imaginable and ensuring there is no practical way of getting in or out of them except a car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 53 minutes ago

We built car dependancy starting in 60, though about 80 in ernest.

We fucked our cities over 40-60 years, and we're seeing the turning point happen in real time right now. Most cities have the policies in place now, or coming in the next 5 years.

On the roads side there's a 45 year lag for recapitalization. On the construction side, harder to tell.

It won't happen in my lifetime, but it will happen in my kid's.

Stay the course and we can do it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I’m going to sound like a moron asking this, but if the country makes over 2 trillion per year, and we are only spending 4 some-odd billion per year, shouldn’t we be able to get out of debt while staying afloat over time?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Because we tax ~0.44T on our 2.2T GDP. Or about 20%.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have a really hard time believing these cuts aren't going to hurt services. They're saying they aren't going to lay off public servants, which suggests to me that it'll be the actual service delivery that'll take the hit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago

They're absolutely saying it will hurt services.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Cutting off your leg is tough but doable.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

What’s this guy’s deal, man. I thought he was supposed to be an economist?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

What’s this guy’s deal, man. I thought he was supposed to be an economist?

Do Economists never cut spending?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Dont worry, he wont be cutting the Bank of Canada's funding, nor the billions in mortgage bonds the Bank of Canada is buying to inflate home values for his stock portfolio. It will be the less important things like health transfers and child benefits.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Doable is a real word now?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

@Mongostein @slykethephoxenix earliest recorded use is from the 15th century, but it's likely from the 12th.

https://www.oed.com/dictionary/doable/_adj#6341248

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Now that’s interesting

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Language evolves constantly. If people use a word and can understand its meaning and context then it’s a perfectly cromulent option.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I don’t disagree. I’ve been saying it since like… 2005. Seeing the CBC use it feels weird though. 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

As an allophone: it isn't?