this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
956 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

8444 readers
2636 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The actual number is 0.000021, or 0.0021%. If you make $50,000 a year, 0.000021 is just $1.05. Bezos spending $5 million on a ring has the same effect on his net wealth as our 50k per year guy spending $1.05 on a wedding ring.

Cheap fucker didn't even come close to spending two months salary on his big love.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

Quickest, simplest fix would be to treat borrowing against unrealized capital gains as income for tax purposes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

The system as it is cannot continue this way. Something must break.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Can I suggest the necks of all billionaires?

[–] outhouseperilous 1 points 5 hours ago

Fingers crossed, but im not optimistic that will be the first thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing will change until the rich and rightwingers are all killed

[–] outhouseperilous 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Hey. They dont all need to be killed.

Lots of them are old as fuck or prone to doing stupid shit. They could just die passively. Heart attacks from too much old. Contaminated blood boy. Unforseeable accident while sunning his balls in the bed of his cybertruck while it's in full self driving.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

It will. But it will disproportionately affect the poor.

[–] outhouseperilous 1 points 5 hours ago

Hoping it will be the necks of the wealthy, confident it will be sonething bigger and more precious.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand how more people aren't upset by this. I guess that's why they installed Trump, to keep us mad about everything else...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Some people live under the delusion that they'll become billionaires someday. They project themselves that far ahead. Oblivious.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought that the rule was supposed to be two months income.

I guess Jeff doesn't really love his new wife.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Jesus Christ. Two months' income is so insane. I'd be pissed if my boyfriend bought me a ring that expensive.

[–] CosmicTurtle0 58 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Two months is what DeBeirs, the assholes who hold a monopoly on diamonds, arbitrarily told people to spend on a diamond.

Ultimately it should be what makes both parties happy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Originally in the they said it was one months' salary. They then upped it two months. And they then upped it Three months

You can also see in the article that they hoard about 60% of the world's diamonds. De Beers is a corrupt company sitting on top of a corrupt system built on blood and death.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

My partner and i bought our own rings. Someone else might have gotten it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

When I still loved her, I got my ex an engagement that was about two days salary tbh. She had many faults, but that's about the only thing she never gave me shit for.

[–] deo 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

you might not mind too much if you lived in a time when women didn't have their own bank accounts or source of income not controlled by their husbands. it was actually a decent rule when it was the only thing of real value you truly owned and could sell if you needed to gtfo of an abusive relationship or give you a bit of breathing room if you were widowed suddenly (and your husband's family decided not to take care of you once he was gone).

but yes, now a days is definitely overkill.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

Like abused wives can easily escape and do their life without repercussions. It isn't a rule to favor abused wives.

[–] altkey 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

My ass was confused there's a different category for wedding rings that has this generally insane pricing. There are a lot of other ways to show a partner they are special. Like a memorable trip for two somewhere nice can go well under that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Like a memorable trip for two somewhere nice

This 1,000,000x time more than some expensive piece of metal and rock

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago

jeffery is not capable of human emotions like love and empathy

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Earned on the backs of working class.

Did Amazon ever acknowledge or deign to negotiate with the unions formed by their workers?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You must pee in a bottle and process a package in 25 seconds...... For the prosperity of Bezos.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago

For the prosperity of Bezos.

That sounded like a legit chant.

[–] miss_demeanour 10 points 1 day ago

Sorry, warehouse is closed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

The rich are thieves that steal from us, our kids, our future!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Current net worth you mean?

[–] miss_demeanour 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Raisin network on average.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

I want to learn how to increase my net raisin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

What does Bernie mean by real tax rate? How is he calculating that 1.1%

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Luigi... Luigi what? Does anybody remember that name?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

TCP/IP? IPX? Arcnet? Token ring?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Damn, her ring is a hundred times less than their ride?

If I do the math with my five hundred dollar ranger that’s about a ring pop.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago

Dam that's an expensive doorbell

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Only 0.000021%. It seems you accidentally threw in an extra zero.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

The fact an order of magnitude made functionally no difference is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's actually three zeros off.

It's 0.0021%

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Damn, you're right. I forgot to account for the conversion to %.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Dang thanks! Spell correct bitting me hard

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

Oh, I get it. Your network is your net worth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›