freddydunningkruger

Actually, all AIs have guards in place to prevent that kind of abuse.. anyone who has tried to make ChatGPT say lewd things has figured that out a long time ago. It's more than likely one of Elon's tweaks lifted some of those restrictions.

The actual number is 0.000021, or 0.0021%. If you make $50,000 a year, 0.000021 is just $1.05. Bezos spending $5 million on a ring has the same effect on his net wealth as our 50k per year guy spending $1.05 on a wedding ring.

Cheap fucker didn't even come close to spending two months salary on his big love.

lol, this is the kind of political thinking that results from an evening in a parent's basement zooted on edibles.

The Republicans thank you for your commitment.

OK, so a dude calling himself buttnugget claims he knows how society actually works, and then follows that up with the statement that "LIBERALISM LEADS TO FASCISM"

Man, when the Republicans went to work attacking and weakening the public education system, they really had their eye on the prize.

Technocrit is all over every political thread, doing his best to spread apathy with the progressive voters, helping to keep the fascists in power.

He's been slinging this same tired BS since the election, back when the Russian ops trying to get Trump elected would give him upvotes and keep him out of the red.

It's literally what you are doing, and the best you can counter with is with pre-school sandbox logic?

No, you are a propagandist, trying to spread apathy amongst voters who could make a difference. You aren't trying to get fewer people to vote for the Republican fascists, your goal is to spread apathy between the people who might vote against them.

Poor technocrit. Your attempt to keep Republicans in power by infecting progressive-leaning voters with apathy, it just keeps getting weaker and weaker, doesn't it?

You forgot someone on your list. You. How would you describe yourself, I wonder? I know how I would.

In Christianity, the bible forbids women from exercising authority over men in the church - they are forbidden from any leadership role within the church. This begs the question: what makes you think Christians will vote to elect a woman to the highest level of leadership this country has, into a position where she can make decisions affecting not just one church, but every single church across the US?

Ask yourself a question: why can't a woman become a preacher, priest or pastor? All major US religions indoctrinate their followers from birth with the teachings that god does NOT permit women to exercise authority over men.

So if Christian and Catholic men and women believe in a core set of values and reasons for why women are not allowed to take leadership roles over men in the church, what makes anyone think they don't or won't apply that same logic to leadership at the political level, or ANY level?

Christians won't let a woman lead their church, but they somehow will be OK with electing a woman into a much higher role, one that can make decisions that affect all churches/the entire world? I don't see it.