this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
128 points (98.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21574 readers
298 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Batley_and_Spen_by-election

It lets people know violence cannot change the balance of power.

all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Everywhere should do this. If you're able to kill a politician and it triggers an election for anyone, then you're just sort of implying that political terrorism works. At least to an extent. The violence was able to indeed effect change because some loner or a group of lunatics is able to kill someone and stop the line of work of the party they disagree with. Now, that may not affect votes themselves in a byelection but still. It's not a message you want to send.

Edit: Oop sorry OP. Only just saw the text you had on the post. I'm just whole ass repeating you.

Edit 2: From the wikipedia.... Conservativism as a political moviement is a blight on humanity.

On 18 June 2016, Liberty GB announced that Jack Buckby, a former BNP politician, would be its candidate in the by-election.[14] Liberty GB registered the description "No to terrorism, yes to Britain", which appeared on the ballot paper instead of the party name.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The BNP were not what we would call Conservatives. They were thugs and nationalistic bigots. Conservatives are a bit less thuggy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Honestly? That feels like semantics

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't think that's true in the US. Jus sayin'