this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
176 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47555 readers
3199 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel's right to defend itself.

"Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon," declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to "remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

“We will do anything to maintain the status quo, up to and including genocidal ethnosupremacy”!

I am honestly so revolted.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Well, that's been the litemotiv of the last century on the area, support a slightly less evil genocidal asshole against another genocidal asshole.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What status quo? They are complicit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

The status quo is Western dominance and power projection.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago

Ukraine had nukes and gave them up. They were invaded.

Iraq gave up their WMD program after the first Gulf War. They were invaded again.

Iran definitely had a nuclear program, but doesn't appear to be pursuing it anymore. They're getting attacked and quite possibly will get invaded.

South Africa had a nuclear program and gave it up. Left alone.

The Great Powers, particularly the United States but also Russia, have shown that your country should just keep going once you start. Chances are, you'll get invaded, anyway.

This is not the way towards anti-proliferation.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 hours ago

But genocide against Palestinians is a-OK.

What does the "G" in G7 stand for? Gaslighting? Genocide? Grift? Maybe there are 7 Gs.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 hours ago

"Iran is two weeks away from nuclear capability" - Netanyahu: 2012, 2015, 2018, 2023, 2025

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

Decided bunch of criminals who brainwashed everyone with existence of the nukes. Legalize recreational nukes. Lol

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

China, India, and Pakistan once again proving that having nukes does actually matter because you can't be arbitrarily shoved around around by the only other nuclear powers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

it also helps if your air defense network doesn't collapse immediately because it turns out that in order to guard these nukes you need also regular capable conventional military

[–] [email protected] 69 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (6 children)

I believe ALL of the following;

  • Iran should not have nuclear weapons
  • Israel should not have nuclear weapons
  • Iran should not weaponize Palestinian suffering or coax them into attacking Israel while Iran itself sees little repercussions
  • Israel should not genocide
  • Israel has committed genocide and should pay a hefty price
  • Neither Iran nor Israel will really answer for their fuckery
  • Palestinians will remain fucked...if they survive.

My heart breaks for the Palestinian people who suffer and die for others' greed, ambition, and political squabbles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I agree with all of your past tense takes. The future remains to be determined. We might all be flattened at this rate.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago

My exact thoughts

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

Exactly. This is not a competition, we don’t have to cheer for either side. Horrible things are happening

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 115 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

Israel is the principal source of regional instability and terror and everyone and his dog knows this.

The kowtowing to Trump and his Zionist sponsors by the client states of the US Empire is an insult to objective reality.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Please don't make Iran out to be some sort of victim in all this. What Israel is doing is wrong, but Iran has funded a lot of terrorists throughout the years, and execute people in medival ways for holding hands with the "wrong" person.

The iranian government is pure fucking evil and deserves to die horrible deaths for what they instigate and fund around the world and in their local area.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's a deep sarcasm that Western oil companies destabilized the Iranian monarchy, that * shockingly* wanted a piece of the pie in such a way it paved the way for islamist extremists to gain power.

Ian used to be pretty liberal and western minded, however westen meddling caused this extreme government.

But God forbid they get the means to (to use the Israeli turn off phrase) 'defend' itself, that would be horrendous.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, yes, we all know Iran used to be liberal a very long time ago.

That ship has sailed, and the current regime isn't great, to say the very least.

Nuclear bombs would not be used to defend Iran. They would be used to defend Khamenei. In the same way that nukes are for defending that shit stain in Israel and not Israel.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Ik no fan of the current regime, I think both Israel and Iran would benefit from a regime change. There's nothing more moral on the Israeli side to explain them deserving nukes over anyone in that region.

But the hypocrisy is that the Western world directly caused this shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Resistance groups that commit some terrorism and no terrorist groups

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And not only that, Israel has nuclear weapons.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

...and it's supposed to be a secret because God forbid having to comply with international treaties on nukes. Well it's not like they respect international law anyway right? But the ones on nukes they just bypass and no one bats an eye

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 12 hours ago (16 children)

nobody should have nuclear weapons.

Sometimes I wonder what the world would be like if the scientists working on the Manhattan project had all agreed it's too much and intentionally sabotage every test.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well then we wouldn’t have nuclear power either

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The first nuclear reactor was in 1942.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Well sure but if you can make a nuclear reactor you can make a nuclear bomb

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 12 hours ago

Jesus fucking Christ. Fuck all of these assholes.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (8 children)

Why? If the West will allow Israel to live stream a genocide and both political parties in the US stick their fingers in their ears and make sounds like children, Iran has no choice but to pursue a nuke to defend itself.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago

I would have worded this differently, but you're right in that it's probably a good idea not to give anyone an extra excuse.

"Oh but we had to" isn't a great excuse, but it is one, and if you take away the threat, it takes it away that argument.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Iran will have nukes. They don't have a choice. Not anymore. It's existentialism at this point. Israel has been trying to engineer a war against Iran for more than 30 years. All the while Iran has played along. IAEA inspectors and all that good shit. And it was all for nothing. Iran knows that now. So does everyone else.

If you're an adversary to the US and its Imperial interests then its a matter of when, not if. Doesn't matter if or how closely you follow their rules. They will come for you in time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They're out of time. US B52s and B2s will obliterate what's left of their nuclear facilities. F35s and drones will do the rest. For all the Zionist propaganda, there's absolutely no evidence Iran wanted to weaponise Uranium and every evidence that they wanted to cooperate with the West in return for sanctions relief, as they did in 2015 with the JCPOA.

The question is can Iran make it painful enough for the US by causing chaos in the straits of Hormuz and damaging oil and gas infrastructure that Trump loses interest and declares victory before he imposes regime change, which is what Netanyahu really wants.

load more comments
view more: next ›