this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
320 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24190 readers
2949 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Trump needs war to stay in power

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago

Trump needs war to use power at home.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Even Bush looks competent compared to the orange clown. This sucks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

To be fair, Bush had Cheney, who was a pure evil zombie bastard....still wasn't Steven Miller

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 day ago (3 children)

get ready for the "oppose bombing iran = you hate freedom and are literally a traitor" narrative from the GOP

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah I’m beginning to smell Iraq level bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If this happens, it is going to be plain as day compared to Iraq. Bush 43 had some benefit of the doubt thanks to 9/11 and getting respected leaders who were seen as nonpartisan (Powell) to sell it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Of course. I just don’t think the administration cares about optics.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My stepmother on father's day: "I absolutely love what Israel is doing because the US didn't have the balls to.

They're going to be fully behind going to war...

🤮 🤮 🤮

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yep. hoodwinked by a conman into thinking it's a great idea to send troops off to die in rich peoples war

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But just think of all the oil we'll get. We'll have ... like ... free gas forever!

— some Bro-caster in the near future

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

People are going to be Freedom Jogging or whatever freedom fries esque bullshit they cook up like last time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

International relations noob here. I get why we want to do this, and sure, do it, but it feels like the real plan is to just keep funding Israel while they do a little ethnic cleansing both countries' leadership wants.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

There's no "ethnic cleansing" happening in Iran, there are targeted strikes on military, economic, and government sites. No invasion, no boots on the ground, and a relatively low amount of casualties in comparison to the number of strikes carried out so far.

The ethnic cleansing is happening in Gaza and West Bank,, also known as "land Israel feels it should control". Israel has no interest in controlling Iran, they just want a government there that isn't an existential threat to Israel. No reason to commit genocide and depopulate land you have no interest in controlling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Israel is a US interest because they are an easier target than the US in a region that tends to prefer terrorist actions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I mean maybe partially but that's not the intent.

We've basically used places like Israel to avoid legal shit we don't wanna do ourselves. Go spy on the middle east and act as a police force so we don't have to. Now Mossad is one of the most effective information controllers in the world because that's what the West wanted of them.

They're basically a guard dog for the oil fields and have started really pulling the lead now that the US is so weak(Trump)

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago

Good. I really hope this passes, but if it doesn't, some people will be on record supporting yet another pointless war in the middle-east.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh NO! This is Atrocious and AGAINST our Strategy of doing LITERALLY EVERYTHING TRUMP WANTS!

-Chuck Schummer and the DNC!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Hey, he's also pushing for Trump to hit Iran

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 hours ago

My car comes with a break pedal and a prevent pedal. Right after a long prevent I like to take a little break.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Mangolini asked Netanyahu not to do this, but he went ahead and did it anyway, banking on it putting the US in a position to be forced to get involved in this war. Mangolini is conflicted because he wants to get the approval of all the dictators, especially when they treat him badly (just like his daddy). But plenty of GOP/MAGA are against getting into wars so Mangolini doesn't want to anger them. It's a divisive issue for the GOP and maga base because it's support Israel vs wait but not go to war for them.

My guess is it should have enough GOP support to pass in the Senate (I know Rand Paul and at least a couple other repubs would support it, but other than Paul who is willing to defy trump, do the others have the guts to vote for it if Boss says no?). As for the House magats I assume they'll just vote however Daddy tells them to. I'd think he would like to have an excuse like this for not joining netanyahu's war.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think you might be underestimating the number of democrats that are also war hawks who want to bomb Iran.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bought Raytheon and Lockheed stock this morning

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You m#*"$#red how many did you say? Wow!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You don't have to censor yourself. Call him a bloody handed loser.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a loser for dropping $20 on a gag for a little light in the dark?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

For directly and unapologetically funding the death and destruction of human lives?

Yes. Yes you are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well, that's just like, your opinion man. If you think my $20 is going to make a difference you aren't a mathematician.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's objectively not an opinion, where the fuck do you think that money goes?

And sure, $20 here doesn't matter. When a million other people also invest $20 "as a gag" or more trying to make a profit, whoops, that's $20 million plus worth of death. They don't make anything else. Only death.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're a little too wrapped up in this and concerned about what a stranger on the internet finds funny.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So please explain then? I'd love to know why a stranger on the internet thinks that financially contributing to industrialized murder is funny. Please do elaborate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think the fucking nuance of it has already gone over your head bud

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

So you have no answer then, cool, thought so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

I could be. I was mostly thinking about what the GOP would do, but I expect most Dems will support it, since they passed pretty much the same bill in 2020.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Too late?

Watch twenty Democrats just straight up vote to declare a war instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Too late. They already started a war.

[–] limer 3 points 1 day ago

I’ve seen these come up every few years, and not just about Iran. Don’t seem to do much

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

It's all just symbolic, from a symbolic play-pretend opposition party. War will happen. Republicans will force it on us, maybe even a declared war for the first time since World War II.