this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
36 points (80.0% liked)

[moved to piefed] movies

4249 readers
4 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I wasn’t aware that it flopped, though this seems to have been the press narrative for many outlets from its release.

$53 million global opening weekend sounds like pretty good business to me.

https://deadline.com/2025/03/mickey-17-ne-zha-2-china-global-international-box-office-1236320079/

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

$53 million global opening weekend sounds like pretty good business to me.

Unfortunately, the movie's budget is $118 million, not including the $80 million Warner Bros. spent to market the movie. And they have to split the revenue 50-50 with the theaters.

Factoring all of those, Mickey 17 would need to make at least $300 million just to break even.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s crazy that the studio would spend more than half the amount of the movie’s budget on marketing. Of course this is Hollywood accounting so who knows where that money actually went.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's pretty standard though. To spend 50% of budget on marketing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I bought the audiobook after seeing articles here instead of seeing the movie in theaters lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Especially since outside of all the "it bombed articles" there was practically fuck all advertising it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I agree - seems a pretty reasonable take for a movie released this time of year. I can't help but wonder if the press covering Hollywood just wants it to fail because of WB's current leadership's unpopularity. I'm no fan either, but something just smells fishy here...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sucks that the author of the article’s takeaway is basically “don’t do original non-franchise films.” I thought

Tap for spoilerMickey 17 captured the unique narration tone of Mickey7 but left something on the table when it came to 7s relationship with 8–they were supposed to have essentially the same personality. Also was annoyed with Pattinson’s voice. Whole thing suffered from lack of focus, adding the preacher angle in was unnecessary and not comical, and the plots were not well woven.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Especially since it's not original, but adapted from a book.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

As a sci-fi nerd, film buff and leftist, this movie was pretty much made for me, but I only found out about it about 2 days before it was released. Seems to me that they didn't push it at all. I only saw it because a friend of mine had a spare ticket.

Unfortunately, we found the movie boring, incoherent and, for the most part, unfunny. I really loved parasite so was very disappointed that this missed the mark so badly.