SanctimoniousApe

joined 10 months ago

After that response, I was expecting "so why don't you do that now?"

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Would this be the first "pocket calculator?"

[failed verification]

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What a... ahem ...crappy shower thought!

Yeah, that's the problem with our system - politicians can make all the bad rules they want because the cost of doing so doesn't come out of their pockets, but instead the victims of their shenanigans wind up paying for it no matter what.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

So then why weren't you wearing them in the first panel? You have contacts, don't you? Off with 'is ears, I say!!

"Why are you talking to yourself?"

"I get better answers that way."

Overly biased post, OP. The decision to include only the first two paragraphs - which were obviously written by The Guardian to make Paramount look bad for "capitulating" - deliberately fails to mention the fact Paramount refused to pay him directly (instead either to his presumed presidential library, or to charities at his discretion), or admit any wrongdoing. Considering how long this has dragged on, preventing the merger they've been working on since well before he was in office again, it's mildly impressive they managed do even just this little in order to move on. Business is business, and they held their ground pretty well while also doing what they had to in order to get past this roadblock.

IMHO, such selective inclusion of information makes your post no better than the Trump legal team spin (for which I hope they get sued once Paramount finishes their merger):

A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team told the Wall Street Journal that the settlement was “another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit”.

🦛🐦🐑🐑!!!

(Hippo birdy two ewe!!!)

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't mean you, specifically. I meant what I said in an abstract sense.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

So, you agree with everything he says... until he changes course yet again. Are you now an enemy of the state (of Elon)?

Same asshole - just spouting different bullshit. There's an infinite variety of bullshit spins, but only ONE real, factual truth. So of course it's the one thing he avoids at any and all costs.

 

Sorry these guys have to put off their retirement, but thank goodness they're willing to.

 

IMHO, the only "hypocrisy" is with the conservative-owned press holding Biden to standards LONG since tossed aside for Trump. The people have made it clear they only respect a government who fights dirty, and WAY effing past time they get what they asked for. In the scheme of things, this is positively mundane - but they'll try to attack anything that Dems do that they'd gleefully make excuses for Trump doing since that pisses off Dems. I congratulate Biden for finally saying "fuck it," and doing the same thing they would do.

 

It blows my mind that there are no legal blocks in place to prevent this (yeah, I know it's because this shit was so unthinkable that nobody prepared for it). This yahoo is on a mission to destroy EVERYTHING America was supposed to stand for. SOMETHING has to be done to stop this shit!

 

Republicans: the party of freedom, my farking ass.

 

Frankly, I hope Elon wins this one. His handling of Twitter demonstrates his incompetence, and his inability to keep his mouth shut will be helpful in preparing to fight whatever BS they're up to next. The other guy might be too smart and sneaky considering his involvement in the fake elector scheme.

 

Google's "Voice Access" is decent for controlling the device through verbal commands, but you have to be looking at the screen to get results - it won't read anything back to you.

Google's "TalkBack" will read things on screen to you, but you have to interact with the screen physically (never mind the significant change in how interactions work - which I understand the need for - but it's still a serious mental PITA to switch between the two interaction methodologies frequently).

Is there no way to just interact with it entirely verbally? A (very) simple example of what I'm looking for:

  1. "What are the current Google News headlines?"
  2. Starts reading each one aloud, along with the names of the sources.
  3. "Read the article about Trump caught making out with Elon from AP News."
  4. Proceeds to load the article & read it aloud.

(Yeah, I know there are podcasts for this - it's meant to illustrate the basic idea of completely verbal interaction with the device, not be an actual problem I'm looking for someone to provide a solution to.)

It just seems to me that we should be able to do this by now - especially with all the AI blow-up over the past couple of years. Can anybody point me to a usable solution to accomplish this?

TIA.

EDIT: I thought of a better example (I think), because it occurred to me that the above one could (sort of) be done with a Google Home speaker. I'm looking to be able to interact with Android apps verbally wherever possible, so my better example is "What are the latest posts made to the 'No Stupid Questions' community on Lemmy?" So far as I know, Google Home is not able to do such a thing. I'd like to tell Android to open my Lemmy client and start reading post headlines until it hit one I wanted to have it open & read to me.

I'm basically looking to use apps verbally to fill in gaps that Google Home/Assistant don't cover.

EDIT 2: Here's an even better, more universally applicable description of what I'm after - copied from a response I gave to another comment:

Imagine someone doing some relatively mindless menial job such as working an assembly line, janitorial work, chauffer - something where your mind is relatively unoccupied, but you're not free to look at and/or touch your device (whether it be due to practicality, or job rules). While doing that job, I want to be able to have the device read and interact with something of interest to me at that moment (ADHD is a fickle mistress), rather than just relying on podcasts with predefined content. Kind of like having someone next to me doing all the interfacing between me and the device.

EDIT 3: I added a comment with some news on options that may come close enough to doing the job which I've come across since posting.

 

I've often assumed Harris didn't want to insult her boss by going against him, because I got the impression she was planning to give Netanyahu what for once she took over - especially with him escalating things further and further. Did anyone else get that vibe, or was it just wishful thinking on my part?

 

People are calling for violence against FEMA on TikTok and X, new reports say.

I seriously don't understand why these people aren't immediately tracked down and arrested for terroristic threats. This BS is way beyond any reasonable "free speech" limit.

view more: next ›