this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
1247 points (99.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

13060 readers
403 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 1 year ago (6 children)

God this fucking masculinity bullshit. It's not masculine to drive big trucks that are impossible to park and maneuver. It's masculine to provide for your community, and to care about people without fear of how you'll be perceived.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but how's many miles per gallon do you get on this "community care?"

/s

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

You mistyped "Gallons per mile"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What else are local governments going to buy with the opiate settlement money? Rehabilitative support options?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Don't forget all the money they get from the civil asset forfeiture auctions.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They bought it? I thought they are surplus from the army?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Cross posting my post the last time this was posted elsewhere, asking "Why Do They Need This?" The Police Problem sublemmy post

Police don't but they often want a vehicle for SWAT related reasons, but SWAT trucks costs hundreds of thousands. Meanwhile MRAPs are "free".

Prosper, Texas is home to 40,000 people. In 2010 their population was under 10k. They have quadrupled in size and are near the DFW area, so it's not really a surprise they took the 1033 offer for an MRAP. That said most of these decom'd heaps of shit are loathesomely expensive. "High Cost of Free MRAPs" by Strongtowns. Most MRAPs being given out are first and second gen versions. And for those first gens, they got sent to the front lines of the GWOT and got beat to shit while newer ones were tested and approved. These old models they're "giving out for free" have tire drum parts never used on later versions, transmissions like that of an F650 with half the reliability, and are ticking time bombs of use. Most cities often estimate maintenance costs at $5k per year, until something actually breaks and they have to get a second MRAP to cannibalize to fix the first. (Hint - that's why you often see them picked up in pairs or more)

That's before the optics. Petaluma, California has one and the police chief has even said "yeah it kinda has some bad optics sending police around in a former war machine".

If your city is wanting to pick one up, it's because someone who has zero experience with them really likes the idea of a big scary diesel monster rolling up on drug houses, and hasn't actually considered that if they can't pony up thousands of tax dollars every 6 months to keep the moneymonster fed, the only place it's gonna drive is into a storage shed.

Edit: I should add that these vehicles are incredibly versatile and aren't necessarily a bad thing for municipalities. With their ride height, sheer bulk, and high torque engines, Fire and rescue could probably make great use them in several cities. They make fantastic road clearing vehicles in the event of large accidents needing to move to the side of the road, or pushing debris out of the way. Additionally in flood prone areas they make very good rescue vehicles due to their ride height and "crew space" inside. They DO have value outside of terrorizing civilian populations, just that that's all PDs will use them for.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

So it's a subscription service...

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You gotta take the officers' perspective into account. They need this as a hiding place for when there are active shooter situations at schools.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The on-board generator powers the coffee maker and popcorn machine and keeps the drinks cold. Where else will they safely get snacks and refreshments while waiting out the school shooting?

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The police union is one of the strongest in America, most Presidential candidates make promises to them during their election campaign.

...probably because of their roll in riot supression. Rulers don't want that service faltering on them at an inopportune moment.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

...probably because of their roll in riot supression. Rulers don't want that service faultering on them at an inopportune moment.

Like on January 6?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thing is Texas cops now know they need this kind of vehicle before they'll feel safe approaching a single school sport shooter in an unlocked classroom, and you wouldn't want them to feel unsafe, now would you?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don’t mess with Texas. Seriously, they’re delicate and can’t handle being messed with.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How dare you! I'm going to fall apart now!!1!!ONE!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Do you know that phrase is from an anti-littering campaign?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_Mess_with_Texas

And you'd think those big, tough Texans wouldn't care for being told not to litter.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Multi-purpose? Name one (that isn't better served by another vehicle).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

This vehicle is ludicrous and Prosper shouldn't have it.

But a "multipurpose" device is almost never the best thing for any given purpose.

My Leatherman is an amazing tool, but I have much better standalone knives, screwdrivers, pliers, and scissors.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Running over protestors? Yeah, maybe a tank would be even better, but I don't think that counts, also less comfortable to drive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (16 children)

What is a vehicle like that even for?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago

Running over protesters.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Spreading managed Democracy!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Its a good job they're pointing at it otherwise I wouldn't have known it was there.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (13 children)

"The MRAP that was reutilized through the 1033 program was declared excess by the Defense Department, it was not purchased using taxpayer funds. It was transferred to Prosper Police Department as a conditional loan, and it will be returned to the DOD when Prosper PD no longer requires it," according to the Defense Logistics Agency.

So the taxpayers did pay for it, just not only local taxpayers. It was taxpayers nationwide through the DoD budget, proving they don't actually need everything we're paying for. So the rest of the country is paying for some bumblefuck police department to get an MRAP.

What is the supposed justification for this department "requiring" this MRAP be "loaned" to them? DOD equipment and functionality should NEVER be utilized by police. The two are different groups for a reason. If the police need assistance at that level, they can call in the National Guard for that help. That's why they exist. There is no reason a local police department ever needs an MRAP.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

To be fair, the military never wanted these. They were a political requirement because Congress wanted a war with zero casualties. But they failed at stopping casualties and they failed at being useful military vehicles because they couldn't drive off road reliably. So we spent hundreds of billions on these things and now we have to replace them with vehicles that actually work off road and protect soldiers.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

They can run over all the kids with that thing..

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What are the multiple purposes of this vehicle?

Just looks like a jacked up six seater truck.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Running over black people.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

And left-leaning protestors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

A small cost of “freedom” - starving children, dilapidated schools, no healthcare, and a $689,000 truck

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

They cropped out the no parking line.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I looked into it. Some interesting stuff

What is it for:

The police department posted a photo of the Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle on its Facebook page on June 1 and invited the public to come out and see it.

"It’s designed for high-water rescues (which saved many people this past week during the floods), active shooter situations, hostage rescues and other critical incidents, ensuring the safety of our officers and community,"

Cost:

The police department said the vehicle was purchased at no cost to taxpayers because the $689,000 armored vehicle was obtained through the Federal 1033 program which means it cost the town nothing.

"The MRAP that was reutilized through the 1033 program was declared excess by the Defense Department, it was not purchased using taxpayer funds. It was transferred to Prosper Police Department as a conditional loan, and it will be returned to the DOD when Prosper PD no longer requires it," according to the Defense Logistics Agency.

https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/prosper-police-departments-emergency-vehicle/3560134/

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Weird to say it wasn't taxpayer funds, I mean I get what they mean, It wasn't local town money. But getting it in loan from the DoD just means it was all americans taxpayer money.

I also wonder who is responsible for vehicle upkeep while they have it and what that entails, specialty vehicles sometimes need specially mechanics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

She does know that this is Texas and not funding schools is the point, right?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It's a shield so they can safely hide behind while a nut job with a gun goes through the next school

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

ACAB is a shit hole state.

ACAB.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They must have so many criminals just popping off RPGs everywhere, sounds dangerous. Remind me never to visit wherever this 'prosper' is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It’s part of the Dallas/Ft Worth metro, but that cost is something like $18 per person in the town.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are they spending $18 per person on schools? Another $18 per person on libraries? What about hospitals?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Socialism! REEEEEEE!!! Why do you hate America???

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

$18 utterly wasted.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›