cringe af, but no need to link a transphobic patsoc wrecker (sun emoji = patsoc, highlighting irrelevant youtuber drama, intentionally using they / them pronouns for a binary trans woman to misgender her).
do better next time.
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15988 readers
1 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
This comment is very wrong. They are neither a patsoc nor do they misgender anyone.
What are you referring to? This twitter user has had the sun emoji for longer than the patsoc horseshit
Meh, maybe i'm overly suspicious here. It just always rubs me the wrong way when out of all the breadtube libs, people always end up picking on the trans ones specifically.
Also nice how everybody suddenly starts dogpiling me here. Feels great.
I wasn't really intending to "dogpile" you I just don't really know how else to say what I said, which needed to be put clearly for the sake of anyone else here that might not check the details, without it being quite blunt.
There's no ill-intent towards you. People make mistakes around here all the time myself very much included in that. Please don't take it personally.
Its three people responding to you, just disengage.
Is this the full interview or the clip from the episode? I haven't watched it but the Chapos say in their episode about the Hillary show that it was obvious they cut Contra off right before she started explaining how the status quo wasn't fixing the problem they were talking about, which seems like exactly what they would do.
Which is why going and performing (because that is all it is in the end) on their platform will never allow you to speak any truths.
All she accomplished was tying herself to one of the most radioactive political figures of the decade.
rich "leftist" e-celeb is actually a liberal
:surprised-pika:
we have this thread every day comrade.
yes she's a liberal. she never pretended to not be a liberal. people assumed she was an epic based leftist because something something the bread book something something antifascism
everyone does this with almost everyone. Its like when people figure out AOC, a socdem who ran on socdem ideas and talks a socdem game is actually.... a socdem. People just assume if they like a person they must be a based ultra leftist comrade and they have to hide their power level but sometimes a shoe is just a shoe.
The only person who has ever pulled off hiding their power level was Fidel Castro. The number of people who sold out, betrayed the cause, or otherwise watered down their politics is orders of magnitudes more.