this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

art

22752 readers
49 users here now

A community for sharing and discussing art, aesthetics, and music relating to '80s, '90s, and '00s retro microgenres and also art in general now!

Some cool genres and aesthetics include:

If you are unsure if a piece of media is on theme for this community, you can make a post asking if it fits. Discussion posts are encouraged, and particularly interesting topics will get pinned periodically.

No links to a store page or advertising. Links to bandcamps, soundclouds, playlists, etc are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/eUCGy

---

Edit

The artist couldn't have used any form of a computer or cell phone in the courtroom. To be sure - I googled NYC courtrooms.

No use of laptop computers or personal stereos [...] All beepers and cell phones must be turned off.

I assume the artist must have done quickie pencil (or whatever) sketch in the courtroom, left court, and used an app.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They should open it up to different artists. Ben Garrison, Scott Adams, Kelly, etc

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

+1000

Trump shirt off looking like a 50 something man with perfect hair and a perfect tan who lifts four hours everyday [muscles gleaming and oiled]. Prosecutor [puny and stupid], Defense attorney (man) [Strong and powerful], defense attorney (woman) [sexy and glamorous] - Created and labelled by Ben Garrison

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Meh, this is just one mediocre artist. The art form isn't dying, there are plenty of skilled artists putting out good courtroom sketches.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

but are these good sketches because they look nice? Or because they accurately convey the moment, the emotions, the plot

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh come on they didn't even try

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It could be sneaky product placement - https://hexbear.net/comment/4911132

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

what the fuck is the logic of no photos again?

Any fucking reason whatsoever? At all????

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Lindbergh baby getting kidnapped ruined things for all of us angery

About 700 members of the media, including 120 cameramen, attended the trial, in which Bruno Hauptmann was convicted. Messenger boys ran about, and unruly photographers climbed on witness tables to get shots, blinding witnesses with their flash bulbs. After Bruno Hauptmann was convicted, he appealed to the New Jersey Court of Appeals claiming that the presence of courtroom cameras and media activity in the courtroom, among other claims, denied him a fair trial.

The appeals court rejected Hauptmann’s claim in State v. Hauptmann. However, concern about the media behavior during the trial caused the American Bar Association in 1937 to amend Canon 35 of its Canons of Judicial Ethics to forbid photographic, television and other broadcast coverage of trials.

https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/cameras-in-the-courtroom/

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Instead of making a basic ass rule like "no climbing on top of tables to do flash photography", we HAVE to ban ALL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR ETERNITY!??

CAN'T EVEN MANDATE A FUCKING COURT APPOINTED PHOTOGRAPHER FOR FUCKS SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE?????????????????????

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, in 1937 safety film was still fairly new (like 30 years old) and the only alternative was nitrocellulose whereas courtroom sketches were being done in the US as far back as John Brown's era and were definitively not 'distracting to a fair trial', so it isn't unreasonable to say "don't fix what's not broken" and just ban cameras outright at the time lol. Especially given even with safety film, flash photography was blinding and obnoxious (loud shutters, etc) even just assuming a single photographer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thats fair and all

I'm Just really fuckin mad because its been 90 (300) years of no one changing any of the dumb shit stuff in this damn country

Even small obvious things, fucks sake

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You gave me a posting idea - https://hexbear.net/post/2530013

I'll probably google what the fuck is the logic of no photos again? and put the results in a comment but don't quote me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I very helpfully did not contribute!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it looks like it was drawn with a computer mouse.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The artist couldn't have used any form of a computer or cell phone in the courtroom. To be sure - I googled NYC courtrooms.

No use of laptop computers or personal stereos [...] All beepers and cell phones must be turned off.

I assume the artist must have done quickie pencil (or whatever) sketch in the courtroom, left court, and used an app.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You also can't bring in vapes. You need to hide one vape in your bag or shoe, somewhere that they'll find so find it but the think you tried. Then you hide one in a really hidden place and use that one.

ypg-brace

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Vapin' in the Restroom

I remembered it as bad but I forgot how awful the actual song is.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

new yorkerification

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This looks like that one Radiohead music video with the guy who drowns and gets his nuts chopped off and the mermaids make him a baby.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

whatever the fuck this artist did makes everyone look like sweat stained political cartoons

or maybe it's blood idk

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The hand in the lower right frame looks like an opossum reaching out for something.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

John Carpenter - the master of horror - is back with The Thing 2: Trump's NYC trial (2025)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It looks like they're incorporating the lazy corporate Memphis style that every corporate website has been using for the past 10 years

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

This sucks so much

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not Michael Cohen, that's obviously Beto O'Rourke

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

WRONG. If he were Beto O'Rourke he would be standing on the table.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm looking at the hands and yeah I'm thinking AI

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

shit artist != AI

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

ONE seems to have a side-gig.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is so bad I didn't even recognise the top right one as being Trump

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I can't stop seeing this in squigglevision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This art sucks.