this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
149 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

10227 readers
383 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
149
How Canada got stuck building low-speed rail | CBC Creator Network (youtu.be)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Canada is great at high-speed rail studies — but not at actually building high-speed rail. So why is it the only country in the developed world considering a new conventional-speed passenger network?

Created by Paige Saunders with special guest Reece Martin

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

"Speed costs, how fast can you afford to go?" Doesn't matter if it's cars, motorcycles, trains or sailboats. It's not a linear increase either.

Having said that, what I'd love to see is all fixed rail infrastructure turned over to a non-profit corporation. Private or public rail companies with the rolling stock would pay fees to run trains on given schedules controlled by the infrastructure company, with priority given to passenger trains. The fees would be enough to cover the costs of rail maintenance and expansion.

With railways open to anyone with rolling stock, competition is increased. Exclusive routes would be eliminated, which would help reduce freight rates.

Over time, separate passenger rail lines would be developed, at least partially subsidized by fees on the freight companies, as passenger rail typically has very thin margins.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

separate passenger rail lines would be developed,

This is key. I used to work for one of the major railroad companies, and passenger trains are an afterthought. There are so many freight trains traveling that there isn't time for anything else. There was barely time for us to get on the track to do maintenance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are you a regular Paige Saunders viewer? That's exactly what he proposed in another one of his videos!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Nope, haven't seen it. I will now though.
I have a soft spot for trains in general. Dad (marketing director) and my grandfather (sales agent) worked for railways. Some of my ideas come from them.

They talked me out of following suit. It's a pretty tough business these days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

By law passenger rail does get priority.

It's just that the fee is so small that it's worth giving priority to freight.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

There's a US law that passenger trains get priority, but that's rarely enforced. In Canada, there's no such law.