ziggurter

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm pretty sure it's just called "NASA", actually.

I mean, communism would be even better, of course. But doing better than SpaceX is nothing particularly revolutionary in itself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

This isn't true at all. Leftism is inherently anti-war. Hence, "no war but class war".

The problem is where the anti-war stance is misrepresented. Unless it is coming from someone inside of Russia (and possibly countries positioning themselves as allied to Russia), who has a chance of possibly affecting Russia's ability to carry out the war through direct action and other political involvement, the stance that the solution is for Russia to back down is not an anti-war position; it is the exact opposite; it is the pushing of the "de-escalation through escalation" bullshit. It is a chauvinistic "our side will never back down" death pact.

The stance of people in Ukraine, the U.S., any NATO country—anywhere that potentially has influence over the Empire, really—must be to push Ukraine to back down in order to be authentically anti-war.

There's also the more controversial leftist argument over whether states can be authentically anti-imperialist. But that's really going to be a matter of whether you support the position I alluded to above for people who have potential political influence over nations which some people would consider "anti-imperialist nations" (due to the intermeshing of imperialism and class conflict, and also the fact that the Empire inherently has more power over, and responsibility toward, the prosecution and ending of wars than its targets). Like, that more controversial position comes up in the rarely seem question of whether Russian leftists should be cheering on and supporting the Russian military in nationalistic zeal, or trying to get Russia to negotiate and back down with as much fervor as Western leftists try to do so with U.S./NATO/Ukraine. We should all be able to agree, at the very least, that those who have the slightest chance at influencing the Empire to back down should do so. And that 100% includes Hasan Piker, who lives, acts, and practices social punditry within the U.S.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sorry: fixed to original video (xcancel -> Twitter) in my original comment, rather than someone reacting to it (YoutTube).

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

This just in: Matthew Miller is still an absolute, whiny, slimy, shit-faced little weasel (apologies to weasels).

That's right: even as he's admitting "Israel has committed war crimes" (oops: make that "almost certain"), he's telling us how he wasn't lying about it, because he was only communicating the "government's official position", and that the war crimes aren't Israel's state policy, and that it's basically like in any other "war/conflict", and telling us that "it's not a genocide" and "it's an open question" whether Israel will hold its goons accountable.

When will this shitbag just die in a fucking fire already?

https://xcancel.com/DropSiteNews/status/1929553189893779573

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait. Why the FUCK would you want to pretend it's an algorithm generating an answer rather than a person (Indian or otherwise)‽ The whole point of LLMs is to try to trick people in the other direction: make them think it is (could be) a human talking to them. It was even the original formulation of the fucking Turing test.

Anyway, the "intelligence" part of "artificial intelligence" is already a lie, so it's not like it's a real thing these Indian workers are attempting to masquerade as.

We've seriously gotten to the point where these algorithms are so over-hyped that we think they actually do a better job at shit than humans do. Holy fucking hell.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was about the one act, not the overall situation. They were prisoners. They wouldn't have been released without a quid pro quo. Whatever you think of the overall situation, you characterizing it as simply a "release" is what is disingenuous.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

SDF releasing ISIS prisoners....I guess joining forces with ISIS is the most punk thing imaginable

Do you say this about Hamas, too? It was a prisoner exchange, not simply a "release".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

With the outer walls and general context of Gaza, each death camp don't really need to be a camp.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Sounds like there were some weasel words that allowed for the imperial interpretation of "temporary and hopefully leading to permanent" but the hopeful interpretation of "permanent". Dealing with fucking amerikkka from the receiving end, as usual....

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

You don't even have to tip your hat to the Thought Police™; they KNOW!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. LOL. It was a pretty sardonic use of the word "good".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Apparently Hasan Piker got temp-banned from Twitch for even discussing the manifesto. And doing it in very critical fashion. Wew.

And Ken Klippenstein posted it (https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/the-israel-embassy-shooter-manifesto) and was apparently visited by the FBI and questioned about how he got it and whether he was conspiring with the shooter or whatever.

The Israel Embassy Shooter Manifesto
900-word document cites Gaza as motive

Ken Klippenstein
May 22, 2025

article text

I’ve obtained the alleged manifesto written by Elias Rodriguez, suspect in the killing of two Israeli Embassy staffers in Washington, DC on Wednesday.

I believe the document to be authentic for several reasons, including the fact that it is signed by Rodriguez and timestamped well before he was named by law enforcement or any media. I am publishing it here not to glorify the violence — which I find abhorrent and condemn — but so the public can better understand the truth of what happened.

Refusing to confront the content of these texts often creates an information vacuum that is quickly filled by hoax documents, conspiracy theories, or selective leaks from authorities that can distort the facts. I believe that sunlight is the best disinfectant, especially when politics is involved, as the document makes clear is the case here.

Metropolitan Police Chief Pamela A. Smith identified Rodriguez as a 30-year-old man from Chicago who she said shouted “Free, free Palestine!” at the scene. The manifesto echoes this message, citing the war in Gaza as its central grievance and framing the killings as an act of political protest.

Below is the document in full.

Explication

May 20, 2025

Halilintar is a word that means something like thunder or lightning. In the wake of an act people look for a text to fix its meaning, so here's an attempt. The atrocities committed by Israelis against Palestine defy description and defy quantification. Instead of reading descriptions mostly we watch them unfold on video, sometimes live. After a few months of rapidly mounting death tolls Israel had obliterated the capacity to even continue counting the dead, which has served its genocide well. At time of writing the Gaza health ministry records 53,000 killed by traumatic force, at least ten thousand lie under rubble, and who knows how many thousands more dead of preventable disease, hunger, with tens of thousands now at risk of imminent famine due to Israeli blockade, all enabled by Western and Arab government complicity. The Gaza information office includes the ten thousand under the rubble with the dead in their own count. In news reports there have been those "ten thousand" under the rubble for months now, despite the continual making of more rubble and repeated bombing of rubble again and again and the bombing of tents amid the rubble. Like the Yemen death toll which had been frozen at some few thousand for years under Saudi-UK-US bombardment before being belatedly revealed to stand at 500k dead, all of these figures are almost surely a criminal undercount. I have no trouble believing the estimates that put the toll at 100,000 or more. More have been murdered since March of this year than in "Protective Edge" and "Cast Lead" put together. What more at this point can one say about the proportion of mangled and burned and exploded human beings whom were children. We who let this happen will never deserve the Palestinians' forgiveness. They've let us know as much.

An armed action is not necessarily a military action. It usually is not. Usually it is theater and spectacle, a quality it shares with many unarmed actions. Nonviolent protest in the opening weeks of the genocide seemed to signal some sort of turning point. Never before had so many tens of thousands joined the Palestinians in the streets across the West. Never before had so many American politicians been forced to concede that, rhetorically at least, the Palestinians were human beings, too. But thus far the rhetoric has not amounted to much. The Israelis themselves boast about their own shock at the free hand the Americans have given them to exterminate the Palestinians. Public opinion has shifted against the genocidal apartheid state, and the American government has simply shrugged, they'll do without public opinion then, criminalize it where they can, suffocate it with bland reassurances that they're doing all they can to restrain Israel where it cannot criminalize protest outright. Aaron Bushnell and others sacrificed themselves in the hopes of stopping the massacre and the state works to make us feel their sacrifice was made in vain, that there is no hope in escalating for Gaza and no point in bringing the war home. We can't let them succeed. Their sacrifices were not made in vain.

The impunity that representatives of our government feel at abetting this slaughter should be revealed as an illusion, then. The impunity we see is the worst for those of us in immediate proximity to the genocidaires. A surgeon who treated victims of the Mayan genocide by the Guatemalan state recounts an instance in which he was operating on a patient who'd been critically injured during a massacre when, suddenly, armed gunmen entered the room and shot the patient to death on his operating table, laughing as they killed him. The physician said the worst part was seeing the killers, well known to him, openly swagger down local streets in the years after.

Elsewhere a man of conscience once attempted to throw Robert McNamara off a Martha's Vineyard-bound ferry into the sea, incensed at the same impunity and arrogance he saw in that butcher of Vietnam as he sat in the ferry's lounge laughing with friends. The man took issue with McNamara's "very posture, telling you, 'My history is fine, and I can be slumped over a bar like this with my good friend Ralph here and you'll have to lump it.'" The man did not succeed in heaving McNamara off a catwalk into the water, the former secretary of state managed to cling to the railing and clamber back to his feet, but the assailant explicated the value of the attempt by saying "Well, I got him outside, just the two of us, and suddenly his history wasn't so fine, was it?"

A word about the morality of armed demonstration. Those of us against the genocide take satisfaction in arguing that the perpetrators and abettors have forfeited their humanity. I sympathize with this viewpoint and understand its value in soothing the psyche which cannot bear to accept the atrocities it witnesses, even mediated through the screen. But inhumanity has long since shown itself to be shockingly common, mundane, prosaically human. A perpetrator may then be a loving parent, a filial child, a generous and charitable friend, an amiable stranger, capable of moral strength at times when it suits him and sometimes even when it does not, and yet be a monster all the same. Humanity doesn't exempt one from accountability. The action would have been morally justified taken 11 years ago during Protective Edge, around the time I personally became acutely aware of our brutal conduct in Palestine. But I think to most Americans such an action would have been illegible, would seem insane. I am glad that today at least there are many Americans for which the action will be highly legible and, in some funny way, the only sane thing to do.

I love you Mom, Dad, baby sis, the rest of my familia, including you, O*****

Free Palestine

-Elias Rodriguez

view more: ‹ prev next ›