in yes/no type questions, 50% success rate is the absolute worst one can do. Any worse and you're just giving an inverted correct answer more than half the time
vrighter
joined 2 years ago
they are improving at an exponential rate. It's just that the exponent is less than one.
got a pc with a good deal. First thing I did was electrically cut off all unnecessary leds
if you're concerned about how much you need to move your hand, then you'll probably love (neo)vim
MOAR TAA!!!!!!
because it's supposed to be usb. Which it's not, intentionally
that's why you get a little robot friend to clean it for you
theoretically, they wouldn't, and yes, that is how it works. The math says so.
opposite or not, they are both tasks that the fixed-matrix-multiplications can utterly fail at. It's not a regulation thing. It's a math thing: this cannot possibly work.
If you could get the checker to be correct all of the time, then you could just do that on the model it's "checking" because it is literally the same thing, with the same failure modes, and the same lack of any real authority in anything it spits
so? It was never advertised as intelligent and capable of solving any task other than that one.
Meanwhile slop generators are capable of doing a lot of things and reasoning.
One claims to be good at chess. The other claims to be good at everything.
the driver itself is kilobytes in size. Megabytes is huge for such a simple thing
ai chip demand explodes amongst manufacturers of crap who hope that demand for ai chips amongst consumers somehow explodes too