Crow Your Enthusiasm
supersquirrel
Well, you should seek /s
Why don't they have any APCs? What was causing them to lose them at such a high rate? Surely if they produce more of them, they won't lose them again to the exact same battlefield tactics.
Because they have resorted to throwing large numbers of armored vehicles at a foe that has innovated with new technology far better and has large amounts of foreign military help especially along intelligence and target acquisition tactics.
The reality is that in Ukraine, the drone and artillery concentration is such that armored vehicles aren't effective. What is effective is having small agile units that can advance before the enemy can direct fire at them.
This could not be further from the truth, I can link plenty of sources to this but no armored vehicles are just as important as they ever have been and you are falling prey to shallow popular mechanics style future war hype pieces if you think that drones and artillery make armor obsolete.
To point out something basic, the reason Ukraine hasn't been able to make decisive use of the 30 or so abrams and 30 or so leopards main battle tanks they were given (which is actually quite an intimidating number of tanks given that these tanks eat Russian tanks for breakfast, well actually usually for a midnight snack...) is that Ukraine hasn't until recently had the necessary artillery to support an armored assault outside the context of decisive air power (which Ukraine also doesn't have).
The thing people often don't realize about main battle tanks is they are much more vulnerable to infantry than one would assume, even when the infantry opposing the tank don't have the means to directly destroy the tank. Tanks must either
- be heavily screened with infantry and other assets to help them not miss a hidden enemy with anti-tank capability or some kind of physical tank trap/hole designed to strand the tank crew in open ground vulnerable to artillery
Or...
- this is the most critical thing! Main battle tanks are best used to create a breach through heavily entrenched enemy lines, but a crucial element of this push must be a very closely coordinated, absolutely oppressive rolling artillery barrage that advances along the front and corridors of an armored heavy assault. This rolling barrage of artillery changes the calculus as not being in a trench or an armored vehicle as infantry becomes a stochastic risk from shrapnel flying out of the air and ending your life.
Tanks can move through this kind of intense breach opened at the absolute most high intensity conflict areas in a land war and survive the hellish conditions which might include very close by artillery support to repel counterattacks.
I speculate that one day we may engineer digital nuts so that this barrier can be breached.
Look that is definitely not what is going on ok? I am a human being, and if I am not a human being the next most likely thing is I am three dogs in a trenchcoat. Those are the only two possibilities.
Hi that is a great question I would love to explore that with you.
Dads are many things to many people and to sum up Dads with a short quip would do a disservice to the diverse lives Dads have all over the world. One thing that typifies all Dads is a tendency to escalate in puns as they age, this can become very acute and is known to have toppled some ancient cultures from the societal uproar that resulted.
Are you a dad?
damn I should have posted this there my bad facepalm
Very good point, well done on solving the puzzle!
Which is exactly the intended conditions ventcure capital investment in WhatsApp was intended to do, now they can just keep cashing in over and over again banking on pure inertia from people already knowing how to use WhatsApp badly to do something they could do far better with another tool.
What that says to me is you are trying to bullshit using a basic tool when you actually need to do the work of onboarding people onto some kind of platform where you can actually coordinate complex things or have conversations between huge groups of people that are still salient to individuals.
No judgement, addiction is a serious thing but...
This doesn't strike me as a healthy perspective on yourself
Check out these videos by Dr. Rachel Kowert
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LpCuWV_BD38
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6wjfoIbydLU
My point isn't to refute your concern for your addictive tendencies with regards to video games but rather to gravely warn you that your fear and self doubt (which are valid) will be preyed on by a whole cottage industry of shitty people selling you fake solutions until you learn the actual science with regards to humans and games (digital or not) from people like Dr. Rachel Kowert.