Sorry I don’t speak Chat GPT.
Try again.
It’s intellectually negligent to hide behind semantics when faced with the vivid realities of history. Your approach is not a defence of reason but an abdication of it.
The article’s simplification is a disservice to historical accuracy and to those who deserve to have the full story of their past acknowledged.
My criticism stands: the article’s content is not merely ‘egregious’ in its oversimplification—it’s irresponsible.
Imagine being a fully formed adult and saying to anyone, in any context, on the internet ‘I’d slap the shit outta you’ with a straight face.
Time for a nap little one.
Boy this thread is a laugh a minute.