This isn't really exciting to read. I really appreciate the article handling this as strict information, it doesn't seem to have any loafed terms or forecasting in it. As you say, it is very accessible and probably the best way to digest this!
Thanks for sharing it. I am curious to see how this manifests.
I wonder how they feel about high fives?
NE Nevada, 14.40 down, 3.30 up. Pretty amazing how much faster 5g is! Wow.
Oh this is nice to hear, I had to switch to Arcpro at work and I don't like it. I have been putting off checking the qgis I have on my personal computer so I'll have to see what's up.
It's there, but they only show the state of Oaxaska for some reason.
Worth noting that cicadas are not locusts, but you are probably correct anyways 😑
They look a little like cockroaches
Not at all! And given that they are still emerging in heavily developed areas, I think this should be a celebration. We've wiped out so much else.
Nothing can be done to him without making him a martyr, so don't treat him as a low level first time offender.
What a neat time to be there! That would be an interesting Yelp review...
You're right, I just mentioned them as an example of splits about exactly what has gone on with the differing beliefs about trinity interpretation. I don't recall that they believed in an evil god. I do recall that some interpretations have other feelings and operate as such.
The Arians and the Church of God are probably not really connected to what op is getting at. I'm definitely not a theologist haha! Maybe I should stay oiy of this...
My limited experience with going to Church of God places indicated to me that they hold this belief, but I do jot know the term for it. They didn't pray to god, they prayed to Jesus, specifically. And cried for him. And thanked him. And apologized to him. And so on. All to Jesus, not god, who are apparently different.
The idea of the Trinity is not the same across all "Christian" religions, see Arianism for example of an early split.
So this is the Cass Report I've seen mentioned over the last few days. Disappointing. I accept that there will be a lot of back and forth discussion amongst those in the relavent fields, but to disregard large bodies of evidence and to use outdated judgment models seems disingenuous at best. Sure, there can be disagreement about certain aspects, but the folks who this affects the most don't have time to dump what seems best now in exchange for only waiting. I can't imagine they will regret trying something now that, in ten years, may no longer be viewed as solid policy. We have so many examples of this that may not be directly related, but still saved and changed lives.