proton_lynx

what are the legal implications?

It would be so fucking nice if we could use AI to bypass copyright claims.

My girlfriend complains when I turn on the fan when we go to sleep. Can't sleep without it

He's the soup nazi of Atari parts?

I hate Java, but wtf are you blabbing about?

Well, well, well, how the turntables...

I didn't know about that. This is neat, I'm gonna try it later. Thanks!

Am I the only one that finds it weird that Louis Rossman is not even mentioned in those articles about right to repair?

I mean, he said that he didn't care at all if his name was mentioned or not and that he would be happy if the movement got traction "by itself", without him being involved.

But I still think it's weird that he is not even mentioned when they are giving examples of pro-repair groups/shops etc. Idk...

I wish Kodi had a better interface for playing YouTube videos. Searching and finding a video to watch with that UI is terrible.

handses

Username checks out?

Yeah, I agree with you that, realistically speaking, Rust people would probably complain when C code brakes their code, but I still think that this was not what Hellwig was talking about.

In my opinion, he was just being unreasonable when he told people that he would be doing everything he can to prevent anything else that's not C code from being merged into the kernel.

I mean, I understand his concerns of not wanting to deal with Rust code, but what he said is not contributing AT ALL to the discussion.

btw, I'm not the one downvoting your comments. I disagree with you but I think you are making some valid points.

I disagree. Hellwig was not contributing with the discussion. The point is that Rust is being integrated into the kernel, whether Hellwig likes it or not. It passed the point of discussing if it should happen or not. Besides that, R4L is responsible for maintaining the Rust code even if something is broken from the C side of things.