Some non peer reviewed paper with a tiny sample size is hardly enough to go "The Science has spoken". On the other hand, one can make an appeal to the intuitive idea that lack of practice implies lack of skill.
This immediately points to the pernicious effects of touting LLMs as a machine to do all the thinking for you. Heck, the enthusiasts are even using LLMs to do their social interactions for them.
This is a warning to people as much as workplaces: is this task you're offloading to LLMs really a skill you want to see atrophied?
Archive link is broken