lps2

I take it you're responding from the lens of using this software in a corporate setting? Otherwise there is functionally no difference in the license vs OSI-compatible open-source licenses unless I'm missing something big which very well could be the case

The company has far outgrown Linus's ability to run it. Half the shit he says on the WAN show I cringe at as someone who's done corporate management / systems consulting for the last decade+. I get the feeling he really is unable to separate his ego from his corporate responsibilities and this inability seeps through in all their content. Just take the Billet Labs fiasco as an example, he was so convinced he knew better that he felt insulted on the WAN show that his conclusion was brought into question when it was shown his methodology was abhorrently flawed; or look to his and the entire team's proclivity to misappropriate inventory to their homes or the projects that personally benefit him and his family - I would hate to be his personal attorney as any litigation hitting LMG is sure to hit him personally as there is ample evidence of the corporate veil being pierced, and JFC why is the entire consumer tech market perpetually in the mindset of a horny 14 year old? Talk about a hostile work environment.

I found it hilarious when he was discussing Blizzard and their actions to be egregious when the vibe at LTT honestly doesn't seem all that different - he seems to be barrelling toward following in their footsteps

Got a Brother color laser all-in-one and am never looking back. I just hope Brother's shareholders don't put pressure on them to take up these shitty practices. They already have some limited / overrideable DRM on toner and that's already a step too far IMO

What's this community's take?

Personally, I find non-commercial, source-available licenses consistent with the community-driven aspect of open-source and less restrictive than more aggressive copy-left licenses like GPL. I find that it allows persons, groups, and corporations to pursue additional business models other than support/services to monetize their work while still ensuring that individuals in the community are able to benefit from the work the sponsor and others are doing.

I understand the concerns this raises especially for the use of open-source tools in the commercial space and hope these source-available licenses are used sparingly and strategically (like in situations like Elastic where Amazon was profiting off Elastic while competing with them and ultimately not contributing back to the project which put the project's funding at risk)

Lawnchair2

You give these people far too much credit - most were slow to uptake social media and they still barely understand it. Drama surrounding ownership of the platform and changes to internal policies around moderation goes far over their heads and they post to Twitter/X because they've been told to for years and it's now a part of their process. No hosting needed on their side, no webmaster, etc just an employee who can tweet or post using some CRM system that defaults to the normal big social media players

Bobwehadababyitsaboy

I wouldn't want to invite bedbugs into my car even if the temp should crest the ~125°F needed to kill the eggs. I'd go to a laundromat and throw it in the dryer and run it several times

Now my soft skills are 99% of my job but for the first ~8 years it was probably 60% programming and 40% sales, networking, and project management.

It's a lot of work centered around managing customer expectations, ensuring the effort is remaining in scope as defined in the SOW, status reporting, and requirements gathering

I would say it doesn't require a business degree only because while I have one, I never went to class so I certainly didn't learn what was needed for the job in school - that just helped with networking and getting my foot in the door. I would study agile methodology and see what certifications you can find for it / scrum. Once you land the first job in this area it's all about keeping up to date on technical skills and honing ones soft skills. For my career progression it played out like this:
Years 1-3 : diving deep into the technical side of things and showing off my prowess by tackling increasingly more difficult use cases
Year 4 : learning how to manage a project and what the true concerns of my customers were.
Years 5-7 : learning how to manage a team and how to connect with my team members as everyone is different. During this time I also dove headfirst into code versioning and devops and deployed a self-hosted Gitlab instance, created a devops pipeline, and created a slew of internal tools that helped other work streams besides my own.
Years 8-9: tackling sales efforts and learning how to position all the processes and service offerings I had crafted in the years prior.
Years 9-11(current) : learning how to manage a team of solutions architects in a large tech company that is highly political.

Sure thing, it's the intersection of those two worlds - often times the degree associated with this type of work is 'Managent Information Systems' and falls under the business school but also involves programming though typically at a more practical level and less theoretical and in the weeds compared to computer science.

I see these jobs in two places:

• within tech companies developing products with titles like "project manager"
• at consulting firms typically with titles like "systems integration consultant" and they are helping develop applications and integrations around implementing software

It is a very lucrative market but can be quite competitive especially when talking about positions at the Big 4

This is the industry I am in so feel free to ask more

Front-end web dev can be very competitive in large part due to the abundance of boot camps like the one you attended. I say differentiate yourself with project management knowledge (even going as far as getting a PMP once you land a job and get experience). This will help you stand out and will open more doors down the road. This isn't going to be as hands-on with coding but that techno-functional role is sorely needed and job prospects look much better

Three new countries joining NATO apparently means US hegemony is collapsing all while dozens of countries sign new agreements to donate old weapons and buy shiny new ones from the US so I guess our hard power is collapsing too using the logic of OP...

The Ukraine war has been one of the biggest boons to western nation's influence in Europe