lily33

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

OK. They have a brain to feel them with. If you're objecting to imprecise terminology here, I'll give you the point, but I don't think that affects my basic point any (I'm not a biologist, I meant insects and the like - though don't take that as definitive either; maybe someone knows an insect with a brain, too).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not three same person, but the demarcation between what should be OK to eat, and what - not - they baked most sense to me, is the capacity to experience pain or emotions.

So I see no substantial moral difference between eating plants or invertebrates, for example - neither can feel harm.

That said, fish and chicken can experience pain or emotions the same as cows and pigs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

OSHA and other safety stuff...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The biggest issue is that there isn't a universal agreement on what causes harm. There is agreement on the basics - murder, violence, etc - but they're already illegal anyways, no need to ban them by license.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

upcoming EU AI Act that regulates open source systems differently, creating an urgent need for practical openness assessment

So when they say "openness" they do put it in the context of open source rather accessibility.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because FOSS shouldn't add burdens. You publish your work and let everyone else use it. That shouldn't add extra obligations on you. Usually, you'd also write some docs - after all, without them nobody will know how to use your program, so why bother publishing - but it shouldn't be an obligation. Make it easy for people to open up their code without this attaching strings.

Documentation is nice, but it's kind of different thing that open source: a program can be open and undocumented, or closed but well documented - and I don't see why we'd want it different for models.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

A bunch of these columns are outright absurd TBH, to the extend I'm not sure the author really knows what FOSS is about. What's open API access even supposed to be - API access is closed by definition.

Also there has never been a requirement that open source software needs to be documented - and for good reason - so I'm not a fan of the documentation column as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How do you block them automatically?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

However, it also uses halium and libhybris. That means you can't just install your favourite distro and upstream tools. Everything that needs GPU acceleration needs to be patched for libhybris. For example, that means no upstream wlroots - and the latest patched version I think is 0.12 or so.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Actually, no, this seems to work on a very different principle.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Not really. It seems to use a very different technology from termux.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm confused... Aren't HOA reps elected by the people living in the HOA? And generally, democracy should work better on a local level where people know each other, not worse... So why do they fail so bad?

view more: ‹ prev next ›