Faire reculer le racisme sous toutes ses formes en France appelle une mobilisation sans faille de tout l’appareil d’État.
Oui, alors à ce sujet...
Faire reculer le racisme sous toutes ses formes en France appelle une mobilisation sans faille de tout l’appareil d’État.
Oui, alors à ce sujet...
Le problème semble moins les touristes que le management toxique dans cette histoire!
I see you shiver with antici… pation
Quel regret de ne jamais tomber sur quelqu'un qui la connait celle là...
The amount of psychopaths in higher management equal the amount in prisons: https://psychology.org.au/news/media_releases/13september2016/brooks
And according to someone I know who went into the highest echelon of a big international company, at some level, it is much more prevalent than that.
C'est la rançon de la reconnaissance scientifique: la médiation a, effectivement, des effets mesurables et parfois importants. Corollaire: c'est pas toujours positif et ça aurait été surprenant qu'il n'existe aucune condition où ça cause des problèmes.
Un autre numérique est possible. Le problème, c’est que nos politiques et nos journalistes sont incapables de l’imaginer.
L'imaginer c'est sans doute difficile, mais ils pourraient au moins faire l'effort de s'intéresser à ce qui existe et qui est possible aujourd'hui.
I am too deeply disturbed by the malleability of psychological definitions. Especially as they describe an important phenomenon that we can observe. We need to have clearer definitions, and I don't really have an answer here, but this is one of the many important subjects to discuss in that domain!
One thing I am pretty sure of is that the "narcissistic personality disorder" does not capture the whole extent of the problem.
high management and middle management have different profile. I feel the Gervais principle captures their dynamics well.
Thing is that there are tons of intuitions and experiences about that phenomenon, and an existing but scarce scientific literature, and very little serious debate. It touches politics, work place, personal relationships, parenting (I mean, the support subreddit /r/raisedbynarcissists has 1M subscribers)
Adam Smith described an already existing system he observed and whom emergent properties he appreciated.
Believing a third or even half of the population has narcissist tendencies seems odd to me
It is actually just a matter of putting your threshold somewhere. Like every dimension of psychometrics, tests exists and will measure a spectrum. They will put people left or right of the average level of narcissism, so like in any other metrics, you can call half of the population "more narcissist than average". You can also split the spectrum in 3 equal part: selfless, normal, narcissist and you have a third of the population, or you can use the DSM definition of pathological narcissism disorder which only considers cases acute enough that they cause distress in the subject and prevent them to hold any job durably, which are the typical criteria for disorders, and with that they consider 6% of the US population has it.
It makes sense however to note that narcissists cause damage before reaching the pathology threshold and calling it a disorder. Toxic politicians, CEOs, conspiracy theorists pushers, have (approximately) functional lives and do not report suffering from their traits, it causes pain to others before it does to them. The matter of where the threshold is, is a worthy matter of debate and one could argue that this specific disorder makes the "subjective feeling of distress" criterion invalid.
Yes, these people exist and often thrive in capitalist societies, but they are not the main cause
In most toxic management, in most companies with terrible ethics, you will find a narcissist at the root of the problem.
I am less sure than OP that capitalism is purely a narcissist system, but at the very least, it seems clear that a lof of the negative aspects of capitalism are caused by that psychological profile and it seems like it rewards them.
Comment ça? On ne peut pas gérer les politiques éducatives à coups de mentons et d'a priori moisis? On doit écouter les experts? mais où va-t-on?