joojmachine

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)

KDE Eco is (AFAIK) a project by the KDE folks to try and push for better optimizations for energy efficiency for software projects in general and to try and push for free software adoption by governments with the main push being the limits of software support by companies and the landfill that limited support creates.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My main hope for this is that their feedback helps the development of benchmarking and profiling tools on Linux. They do have quite a bunch of experience with them that could be really useful.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

more people than you would imagine, unfortunately

the main takeaway from this is that when this becomes the default, eventually electron apps will also have this by default

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it's a project with a cohesive idea of what it wants to build, to a certain extent they are perfectly right to stand with "their way or the highway"

this isn't an apple thing, it's just that in the operating system market there isn't any other example of someone having a defined idea of what they want to build

KDE tries to be all of those things, but trying to cast too wide of a net just gets you a mess of settings and unfortunately buggy experience overall

small edit: I have a ton of respect for the KDE devs, I just realized I've been sounding too negative about them, I just don't like the end product

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

it's something I've been pointing out for almost half a decade now, the main problem with KDE isn't any of the bugs, it's the lack of vision of what the project wants to be

it ends up being a mix of windows with now GNOME's design due to it never being able to say no when people want "more features and more preferences"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, forgot the Korean term for it, but it's basically potato potato

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

mfw the zaibatsu does zaibatsu things

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

it totally does, it's pretty easy to install and run on regular distros and just a bit more work to do in immutable ones, but with davincibox it's bound to get better

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is, but when it comes to more complex needs, it falls short. It is really good for simpler editing needs and it is getting better fast.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (19 children)

DaVinci Resolve is THE video editor on Linux. Unfortunately the libre apps for it don't get even close, to the point that even with all the limitations in the free and paid versions, it still is the best option.

Also shout out to Bitwig Studio, although I don't use it.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

extremely common Ubuntu L

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

make sure the hardware really works

Also make sure the software really works, one of the main issues with Linux adoption by hardware manufacturers is their lack of dedication to it. In Brazil, for example, most brands that ship with a Linux distro (except for DELL, which ships with Ubuntu) ship with basically digital waste (unmantained, poorly developed distros) just to make the hardware cheaper, because they know people will get it to just install a pirated copy of Windows in it.

 

The tl;dr is: pretty much Silverblue for RHEL

7
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

A great deep dive on the recent post about the financial situation of the GNOME Foundation by Niccolo Vé, a KDE developer, and an ever better debunk of a particular Linux "Journalist" and their misinformation campaign against the project.

 

Just sharing this really well produced video on Linux's public perception (since this channel has suprisingly not a lot of subscribers)

 

Just a heads-up for the newer Fedora Atomic users out there, and a focus on this part for the longer-term users:

This only impacts new installations and not updated systems thus systems installed from artifacts before those releases are not impacted (Fedora 38 or earlier).

view more: ‹ prev next ›