Well, it would help a bit if the full markings were correct.
jadero
Did you miss the part where they've found a birth certificate showing that she was not born on any reservation.
She also made official reference to her birthplace as part of getting married in 1982, just to seal the deal.
We used to get at least some of them before the advertisers conned themselves (with the help of Google et al) into thinking that they had to know who we are instead of what our active interests are.
... it'll likely only exist as an incredibly niche thing because not many people will hear about it...
Sounds like they need some ads! :)
There are actually such things as relevant ads. One of the paper magazines I used to subscribe to was "Small Craft Advisor". In addition to the articles and editorial content, there were articles written by vendors about their products and traditional ads. Literally everything in that magazine was aimed at small boat owners and builders. No BMWs, no Rolexes, no shaving products, just very specific content and ads for those passionate about small boats.
When they switched to online only, enough subscribers reached out to them regarding the loss of vendor articles and ads that they now occasionally put out something to address that loss.
I don't know where else I could learn about a new epoxy product or a new boat design so easily.
Within the context of the subject matter, that was a quick excerpt. And, in fact, the transcript from which that excerpt was extracted can probably be considered a relatively quick excerpt from the entire system.
Sometimes it is just not possible to simplify further or be more concise without just saying "trust me, it's better than what we had up to now." That is especially true when we have all learned, I hope, that "trust me, I saw it on the internet" is a really lousy way to make decisions.
Thanks to you, too. It's really nice to have respectful discussions of complex topics.
If I've made sense, it's only because this kind of discussion helps me understand a little more each day.
Well, that's just stupid. I was in Scouting for a little over a decade and we participated in many secular events. Secular doesn't mean atheist, it means not specifically religious. This is like saying they can't volunteer at the food bank because it's a secular organization.
Not being a theocracy or even having an official religion, our country itself is secular.
Meta for the bot.
According to the name of the poster, this was posted by a bot. Four versions of the same story into the same community.
I can imagine several reasons to link several versions of the same story, but can't think of any reason why they should be several different posts.
I'd be a lot happier if the 4 stories were 4 links within a single post.
Bonus points if you can use something like the summerizer bot to generate a merged version, highlighting the differences between the stories. And if there are no substantive differences, call that out, too, so that we know that it's just 4 different publications of the same press release.
I don't think we need to bring insults in. They have their views. I don't know how they came to those views, but they are clearly as strongly held as mine. I didn't read anything to convince me that they were arguing in bad faith and I can only hope that they are as willing as I am to accept that there might be some hard edges that need softening.
I thought the whole point of the parliamentary system with the Prime Minister selected by the governing parties rather than through general election was about limiting the power held by one person. Shame on those who voted against this.